Inflammation and stories on global poverty

Posts

, ,

Poverty Reduction 2025: Top 10 Landmark Achievements

Poverty Reduction 2025: Top 10 Landmark Achievements The following is a “Good News” rundown of 2025, bringing important, positive stories to the top of the agenda. Here are 10 poverty-reduction 2025 landmark achievements that continue to spur the movement forward in the fight against global poverty.

Top 10 Landmark Achievements

  1. Safer Standing. Firstly, recognition for the 300,000th landmine removed from Sri Lankan land this year. The landmines were remnants left behind from the country’s civil war, which persisted for more than three decades and ended in 2009. A nonprofit organization conducted the operation, highlighting the role institutions outside government can play in improving society. The removal of these landmines has allowed 280,000 people to return to their homes. The nonprofit in question, HALO, has rendered 120 square kilometers of land safe again. People can now return home and travel safely and freely. This marks an important accomplishment that promises a safer life for communities across Sri Lanka.
  2. India. Traveling north to India, the second entry on this list of poverty reduction achievements, the country has seen a significant drop in the proportion of its population living in poverty. This includes the declaration of Kerala as India’s first state free of extreme poverty. This progress is linked to the Extreme Poverty Program, which established initiatives including providing families with homes, allocating land and assisting with home repairs. These efforts relied on cooperation among communities, government and local assemblies. This achievement stands as one of the most notable 2025 poverty-reduction milestones.
  3. Bangladesh. Moving east to Bangladesh, nearly the entire population has gained access to basic electricity for the first time. This development supports the United Nations goal of universal electricity access by 2030. Over the past 30 years, access to electricity in Bangladesh has increased by about 85%, compared with just 14% of the population having power in 1991. This improvement signals continued progress. Access to electricity affects daily life in critical ways, including the ability to read after sunset.
  4. Nigeria. Turning toward technological innovation, 2025 saw a young inventor spreading light across Nigeria using recycled plastic tiles to create clean-power charging stations. Named the Commonwealth’s Young Person of the Year in March, Anigbogu has delivered energy access to communities with little or no power across Nigeria, Rwanda, Zimbabwe and Tanzania. This supports education, communication, health, safety and poverty alleviation. Anigbogu’s focus on clean power also promotes a future less dependent on fossil fuels. Beyond the technology itself, LightEd prioritizes community welfare by creating safe spaces and providing energy access to displaced people. This includes lighting refugee camps, increasing safety and offering education on environmental sustainability.
  5. Democratic Republic of the Congo. Poverty reduction 2025 landmark achievements also included renewed peace efforts. In June, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared a peace agreement known as the Washington Accord, aiming to end conflict dating back to 1994. The agreement includes the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers from eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. In return, the Democratic Republic of the Congo government agreed to stop supporting anti-Rwandan insurgents. The deal also includes commitments to economic cooperation.
  6. Mozambique. In Mozambique, 2025 marked the introduction of the first fully inclusive emergency data collection tool designed to close the disability gap in emergency response. The tool aims to improve inclusion by involving people with disabilities in response planning. The Elrha project developed the tool to assess barriers faced by people with disabilities during emergencies. The approach integrates disabled people as data contributors through its SIRA survey. Field use in Mozambique identified the tool as vital for improving accessible humanitarian aid.
  7. Tibet. The seventh achievement on this list was announced in July, when Chinese officials demonstrated progress on what is forecast to become the world’s largest solar farm. Located in Tibet, the project is expected to cover an area comparable to the city of Chicago. China reported a decrease in carbon emissions within the first six months of the year. The solar farm stretches across desert land, reducing wind and soil erosion while allowing vegetation to take root. The project represents a milestone in demonstrating economic growth alongside emissions reduction.
  8. Indonesia. In Indonesia, the government launched a free meal program for children and pregnant women. Within four years, the initiative aims to reach 82.9 million people. The program addresses high rates of maternal and child malnutrition. The free meal program was a central policy of President Prabowo’s election campaign. Government officials and soldiers now serve meals including fried chicken, tofu, rice and oranges. Mothers across more than 20 provinces have reported positive outcomes, supporting efforts to address food insecurity, stunting and wasting.
  9. Switzerland. The first malaria treatment designed specifically for babies received approval in Switzerland in July. In 2023, malaria caused more than 597,000 deaths worldwide. Until now, available treatments were unsuitable for infants due to liver development concerns. The pharmaceutical company Novartis developed the treatment, commonly known as Riamet Baby. After nearly three decades of research, the treatment is scheduled for rollout in eight African countries this year.
  10. Ireland. Ireland announced that a basic income is now a legal right for artists. The policy aims to reduce financial instability and discourage people from leaving the arts sector. The scheme pays 2,000 artists and creative workers €325 per week. After a pilot program launched in 2022, the initiative expanded nationwide and will continue until February 2026. The policy supports artists affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and strengthens Ireland’s arts sector.

Looking Ahead

These poverty reduction 2025 achievements highlight steady progress toward improving living conditions worldwide. From expanded access to basic services to peace initiatives and innovation, these efforts demonstrate that targeted solutions can create lasting change. Together, they show continued momentum in the global fight against poverty.

– Maya Hollick

Maya is based in the United Kingdom and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pexels

, ,

How Foreign Aid Cuts Hurt Global Poverty Reduction

Global Poverty at Risk as Foreign Aid Cuts Accelerate WorldwideGlobal poverty eradication faces a growing threat as wealthy nations reduce foreign aid and international relief programs. After years of modest growth, official development assistance has dropped sharply, with reductions of 15–22% as governments redirect spending from humanitarian programs toward defense budgets. These cuts coincide with a worsening debt crisis across the developing world, raising fears that millions of people could be pushed back into extreme poverty. This trend illustrates how foreign aid cuts hurt global poverty reduction and threaten to undo decades of hard-won progress.

The Reversal of Aid Growth and Its Immediate Effects

Between 2018 and 2023, foreign aid from high-income countries grew by approximately 6% annually, signaling a fragile commitment to global poverty reduction. However, this momentum has now reversed. Across the United States and Europe, governments are rescinding foreign aid commitments and scaling back international relief programs in favor of increased defense spending. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, official development assistance has fallen by as much as 22% as countries reallocate resources from social investment to military priorities.

In the United States, this shift has been particularly stark. Cuts to traditional foreign assistance programs, proposals to eliminate long-standing aid mechanisms and the use of pocket vetoes on appropriated funds have weakened development institutions. These reductions have occurred alongside an estimated $1 trillion surge in U.S. defense spending, highlighting a broader policy realignment away from poverty-focused engagement abroad. While defense budgets have expanded, funding for health care, food security and humanitarian relief in low-income countries has contracted, placing vulnerable populations at heightened risk. This reallocation demonstrates how foreign aid cuts hurt global poverty reduction as essential resources for health and food security are withdrawn.

The Debt Crisis and Vulnerabilities in Developing Countries

The timing of these foreign aid cuts has raised concerns. A 2025 briefing paper by the Finnish Institute of International Affairs warned that more than 50 low-income countries faced a high risk of sovereign default due to post-pandemic borrowing, rising global interest rates and declining access to concessional financing. As debt servicing costs rise, governments often divert funds away from education, health care and social protection, investments essential for reducing poverty. This dynamic threatens to reverse decades of progress against extreme poverty and widen global inequality.

The U.S. retreat from foreign assistance has amplified these pressures. The FIIA briefing describes recent aid retrenchment as part of a broader global development crisis, noting that cuts to humanitarian and democracy assistance have destabilized international relief systems on which millions depend. European governments have mirrored this trend by redirecting aid budgets toward domestic priorities and defense, further shrinking the global pool of resources available to fight poverty. When combined with the debt crisis, the evidence shows that foreign aid cuts hurt global poverty reduction by leaving fragile economies without a vital safety net.

Foreign aid has become increasingly politicized. In the United States, development assistance is often portrayed as wasteful and disconnected from taxpayers’ needs. CFR argues that aid advocates have struggled to maintain public support by emphasizing moral obligation rather than strategic value (CFR, 2025). As a result, foreign aid is vulnerable to cuts during periods of political polarization, making sustained investment in poverty reduction more difficult to defend.

A Shift From Aid to Investment

Not all forms of international engagement have declined. Funding for the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation increased by approximately 280%, reflecting a shift toward investment-driven development approaches.

While such tools can stimulate economic growth, experts caution that they cannot replace poverty-focused aid and humanitarian relief programs designed to directly reach the world’s poorest populations. Financial and capital investments should be supported by targeted efforts that have historically been delivered via NGOs, nonprofits and collaborative philanthropic work. This distinction is important because many investment tools are return-driven, while humanitarian and nonprofit programs prioritize poverty reduction outcomes.

The Center for Global Development warns that reductions in U.S. funding threaten multilateral development banks and sector-specific programs that play a critical role in combating poverty. Concessional finance windows and institutions such as the World Food Programme and global health funds provide lifeline services that stabilize fragile economies and protect vulnerable communities. When these programs are disrupted, food insecurity, disease and economic instability rise, conditions that deepen poverty and increase long-term development costs.

Political Pressures and the Path to Recovery

Foreign aid also serves broader strategic goals. The CFR identifies three core objectives for effective assistance: preventing crises abroad that threaten the U.S. homeland, competing with geopolitical rivals through soft power and strengthening supply chains that support economic stability. Cuts to foreign aid weaken U.S. influence, create openings for rival powers and increase the likelihood of economic shocks that can affect American consumers.

Perhaps the most concerning issue is the long-term impact of sustained aid retrenchment. The CFR cautions that the deeper and longer foreign assistance budgets are cut, the harder it becomes for future administrations, regardless of political affiliation, to justify restoring them. As institutions lose capacity and partnerships erode, rebuilding effective poverty reduction programs becomes increasingly difficult and costly. This institutional decay shows how sustained foreign aid cuts hurt global poverty reduction by dismantling the architecture needed to fight it.

Looking Ahead

The debate over foreign aid reflects broader questions about global responsibility and international engagement. Without renewed commitment and clearer accountability, continued reductions risk entrenching deeper global poverty and increasing the long-term costs of inaction.

– Christopher Pellant

Christopher is based in Evansville, IN, USA and focuses on Business and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Fighting Poverty by Preparing for the Next Pandemic

Preparing for the Next Pandemic After the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the international community are trying to prepare for the next outbreak. Epidemiologists label this future pandemic as “Disease X,” likely from one of the 25 known virus families; they estimate that it could be significantly deadlier than previous pandemics. Fighting global poverty has been central to how the international community fights against disease.

Preparing for the next pandemic supports people in low- and middle-income countries in two key ways. First, addressing systemic challenges such as pollution, deforestation and limited access to sustainable health care can reduce the likelihood and impact of future outbreaks. Second, the effects of disease tend to be more severe for populations living in poverty. The international community can help by funding existing health initiatives—particularly in tropical regions of the Americas, Africa and Asia—and by supporting efforts like the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations’ (CEPI) 100 Day Mission, which aims to accelerate vaccine development and save lives. 

Challenges in Pandemic Planning

Experts suggest that one of the most difficult parts of improving global public health is preparing for the next pandemic before it happens. The major challenge is getting governments to invest ahead of time, despite not knowing exactly when, where or how the next major disease will strike. Caroline Buckee, professor of epidemiology and associate director of the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics (CCDD), noted,  

“One of the confirmatory lessons for me—it’s not a new lesson—was that governments and people are reactive. And it’s very hard to get significant investment in preparedness. When it comes to pandemics, or epidemics in general, one of the hardest things about preparedness is that if you’re doing it really well, no outbreak—or only a small outbreak—occurs. Proving that you have averted an epidemic is difficult, so politically, how do you justify the investment required? It’s a really hard problem.”

One of the ways epidemiologists prepare for something that is both unpredictable and inevitable is by ranking the likeliest outbreaks to become a major issue, including “another possible Disease X, a term used to describe a currently unknown pathogen with pandemic potential.” 

Tracking Zoonotic Threats

One of the ways health experts accurately prepare is through pathogen rankings like the Priority Zoonotic Disease Lists and the Research and Development Blueprint. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, in partnership with the University of California, Davis, has developed a new analytical tool called SpillOver to help predict the most likely risks.

SpillOver evaluates the likelihood of animal-to-human spillover among viruses, like the zoonotic transfer that occurred with the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. So far, the project has isolated 12 separate zoonotic diseases that are most likely to infect, ranging from Simian foamy virus to Lassa virus. SpillOver 2.0 will incorporate more data in order to more holistically analyze which diseases we need to prepare for. 

The Impact on Global Poverty

This massive effort of analyzing and preparing for the next pandemic is critical to fighting global poverty for two major reasons. First, pandemics disproportionately harm the global poor. Analysis from The Lancet found that if a pandemic of similar proportions to the 1918 influenza epidemic were to occur in 2025, there would be 62 million fatalities, 96% of which would be in lower-income countries. By contrast, investing in poverty relief helps combat disease spread through improved health systems, increased health education and more effective sanitation. 

Secondly, the fight against poverty and the effort to control pandemics are linked. The wider systemic issues that cause global poverty also increase the risk of a disease outbreak and that same outbreak developing into a full-blown pandemic. The WHO has warned that this next pandemic, labeled Disease X, “could be 20 times more lethal than COVID-19, with very high costs, possibly no vaccines and enormous social and economic impacts.” 

The most likely risk is a zoonotic disease from a tropical region, all places suffering from high poverty rates, climate change and deforestation. These three main factors increase the likelihood of a tropical animal-to-human outbreak turning into the next COVID-19. While deforestation increases the possibility of spillover, combating deforestation not only helps prevent outbreak but also can reduce poverty as well. 

Rapid Response and Vaccine Development

As daunting as this may be for the global poor, the international community and health experts are learning from the last pandemic. CEPI is leading efforts to ensure that life-saving vaccines can be made available across the developing world in as little as 100 days, compared to the traditional five-year timeline. 

Started in 2014 to help combat Ebola, CEPI also played a critical role in reducing the COVID-19 vaccine development timeline to 12 to 18 months. By focusing on increased research, development and mass production, “…CEPI has simultaneously advanced the development of 11 rapid response platforms to deploy against unknown threats, or Disease X.” Being able to predict which diseases may emerge from and affect the developing world is critical to fast-tracking vaccines, which have historically saved an estimated 154 million lives worldwide. 

Looking Ahead: A Shared Global Strategy

While preparing for the next pandemic is difficult and full of uncertainties, expert opinions suggest that focusing efforts will be critical to combating global poverty. By identifying the most likely pathogens as potential future “Disease X” threats, the international scientific community has helped concentrate resources that can be used effectively in the developing world. Hence, fighting global poverty and protecting global health appear to be essential parts of the same strategy.

– Joseph Laughon

Joseph is based in Sacramento, CA, USA and focuses on Technology and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

,

CDB and the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty

Global Alliance Against Hunger and PovertyThe Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) is a banking organization that is under the Board of Governors with a mission of reducing poverty and transforming lives through sustainable, resilient and inclusive development. Thus, providing a system for member Caribbean nations to borrow from and lend the necessary funding for developing their economies through the production and trade of resources. CDB was formed on Oct. 18, 1969, in Kingston, Jamaica and commenced operations the following year.

After electing its newest president in 2025, Daniel Best, the CDB is working to address geopolitical tensions and shifting financial conditions, while approving a historic $460 million from the Special Development Fund — an amount intended to sustain the organization for three years. Best is intending to start in his newly appointed position, hitting the ground running by looking to introduce three new financial products to support a just green transition and reduce investment risk for the private sector. Furthermore, he’s made it an utmost priority to address the United Nations (U.N.)  Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2 by joining the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty.

Integration with the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty

The Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty is a governance structure that focuses on accelerating the achievement of specifically SDG 1 and 2—No Poverty (1) and Zero Hunger (2). Many board members of the CDB have reached out to the press, explaining that the organization sought to join the Global Alliance Against Hunger to address globalized poverty and food insecurity through sustainable agricultural practices. In addition, this decision could enhance domestic lives in the Caribbean by working with international programs and partners incorporated with the Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty.

Before publicly joining this fight alongside such an established organization, the CDB pledged to support the Alliance’s objectives through knowledge sharing, ethical engagement and the development of solutions tailored to the needs of vulnerable communities, including Indigenous populations and tribal groups. Both governance bodies have been made aware of the disproportionate poverty indigenous populations experience in not just the Caribbean, but all of Latin America. Of the 42 million Indigenous people living in the region, 43% live in poverty — more than twice the rate of non-Indigenous populations in Latin America — deepening their underrepresentation in areas such as the humanities and politics, according to Elizabeth Wong’s article Indigenous Erasure and Resistance in the Caribbean. Fortunately, the CDB and Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty are exploring strategies on how to address this long-established systematic oppression.

Furthering Progress

While addressing domestic issues with support from international partners is a strength of the Caribbean Development Bank, the organization also maintains a mutual aid agreement to advance the SDGs abroad. However, this task could be a lot more challenging, as in the last year, the World Bank has found a divergence in SDG 1 and SDG 2—which primarily have a close correlation with one another—in the past one to two decades. This could mean several things, ranging from poor or outdated data and analysis tools or genuine economic gaps in certain countries.

Moving Forward

The CDB appears to be in a position to be a key contributor in providing aid to address the issue and resolve weaker data systems among affected nations. As a region that many consider data poor, the integration of new data systems—if the U.N. can successfully achieve this—could improve the region’s capacity to properly track poor and malnourished environments. This could legitimize the organization’s influence, effectively resulting in its global expansion to provide improved analysis measures for more data-poor nations and regions.

– Sam Barbagallo

Sam is based in Tewksbury, MA USA and focuses on Business and Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty Reduction

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty ReductionGlobal leaders often play a critical role in driving poverty reduction by casting decisive votes and implementing impactful policies. Indeed, around the world, several leaders have introduced programs that contribute to measurable poverty alleviation. Here are five global leaders who have focused on poverty reduction in their countries.

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty Reduction

  1. Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping serves as the president of China, one of the world’s largest economies. Since he assumed office, the Chinese government reports that it has lifted 98.99 million people out of extreme poverty, defined as living on less than $1.69 per day. Poverty reduction has remained a central focus of national policy during Xi’s leadership.
    The nearly 100 million people affected by this effort live in diverse regions. The government supported more than 128,000 villages in improving community development.
  2. Katrín Jakobsdóttir. Katrín Jakobsdóttir is the Prime Minister of Iceland, one of the northernmost countries in the world. Jakobsdóttir is a well-respected feminist, known for her achievements in addressing poverty among women. In 2018, her administration enacted a law that prohibits unequal pay between men and women for the same work. In 2017, 13.6% of women in Iceland lived in poverty. Following the new law, that number dropped to 11.3% in 2018. By 2023, the poverty rate had fallen further to 8.9% for women and 9% for men.
  3. Narendra Modi. Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister of India, the most populous country in the world, located in South Asia. Since he took office in 2014, the Indian government reports that it has lifted 250 million people out of poverty. Over the last decade, India’s GDP per capita rose by $2,000, while 17% of the population moved above the poverty line. Modi’s administration continues to focus on sustainable development as part of its broader economic strategy.
  4. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the President of Brazil, the largest country in Latin America. His success in reducing poverty is largely attributed to a social program he implemented called “Bolsa Família.” This program has reached more than 50 million people in Brazil, offering families in poverty financial benefits on the condition that they attend regular medical check-ups and ensure their children receive an education. This compromise has shown to be effective.
  5. Paul Kagame. Paul Kagame is the President of Rwanda, a country in central Africa near Lake Victoria. Upon taking office in 2000, Kagame launched a program called Rwanda Vision 2020, which has exceeded its initial expectations. In 2000, Rwanda’s poverty rate was 75.2%. However, by 2024, this figure had fallen to 38.2%. Rwanda has invested in agriculture, health care and education to improve livelihoods across the country. However, ongoing regional conflict involving the M23 militia poses challenges to further development.

Leadership and Poverty Reduction

These political figures demonstrate a range of approaches to poverty reduction, from equal pay laws to social protection programs. While each country faces unique challenges, the common thread among these leaders is their early and sustained commitment to addressing poverty through policy and investment. Their efforts offer useful models for other nations and underscore the importance of leadership in global poverty reduction.

– Nicholas East

Nicholas is based in Ashby, MA, USA and focuses on Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Tackling Data Bias in Poverty Metrics: From MDGs to SDGs

Poverty MetricsPoverty alleviation remains a core focus of global development efforts under the 2030 United Nations (U.N.) Agenda. However, questions continue to arise about the accuracy and inclusivity of the metrics that define and measure poverty—especially in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) legacy. Critics point to a persistent data bias in poverty metrics, which has become even more pronounced with the rise of predictive artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven development planning.

Overly Ambitious MDGs

The MDGs, followed by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), initially aimed to achieve basic development milestones but failed to demonstrate significant progress toward sustainable development in practice. The U.N. introduced the MDGs in 2000 to address extreme global poverty.

During the early rollout of the MDGs, many observers predicted near-certain failure due to “overly ambitious goals” and “unrealistic expectations placed on aid.” Vague and sweeping targets relied on 1990 baseline levels for indicators such as child mortality and access to clean water—despite limited data availability. This reliance created a data void where estimates depended largely on guesswork. Many viewed the underlying assumption—that aid transfers alone could resolve poverty—as flawed, particularly given the global context shaped by capitalist globalization and historical exploitation.

The U.N. Independent Expert Advisory Group later criticized the MDGs for lacking sufficient data, noting that fewer than 70% of required indicators had consistent reporting in any five years. In response, the U.N. introduced the SDGs in 2015 with 231 indicators to address data gaps and improve goal tracking across development efforts.

The SDGs Data Revolution

The SDGs replaced the MDGs and marked a shift toward a more data-driven, metric-heavy development model. This approach emphasizes “big data” and quantifiable benchmarks to define and monitor progress. However, relying heavily on quantitative data presents challenges. In poverty metrics, numerical targets often distort or oversimplify the real issues. Numbers can obscure the theoretical debates that drive progress, obstructing efforts to address structural inequalities and the underlying causes of poverty.

The SDGs’ poverty eradication target continues to draw from a Eurocentric definition of poverty that emphasizes meeting basic needs. This narrow approach overlooks broader and more critical frameworks, such as feminist, racial, or decolonial theories. For instance, the focus on primary school enrollment as a proxy for educational progress ignores the need for vocational skills training and access to secondary or higher education. It also assumes that children who enroll in primary school will continue their education—an assumption that fails in contexts where girls often leave school early to become houseworkers or wives.

The data rarely reflects racial disparities in access to education—such as the disproportionate number of minority children unable to attend school. As a result, the metrics often look impressive on paper but lack practical value. These biases reinforce dominant ideologies and redefine development only in terms of poverty alleviation while failing to address its root causes.

Existing Gaps in Quantitative Data Use

Another growing concern is the increasing use of big data and AI to generate development metrics. AI models, trained on datasets mostly derived from Western countries, often replicate and amplify existing biases. These systems apply Eurocentric assumptions to global poverty issues and generate outputs that fail to capture the diverse realities of communities outside of the United States (U.S.) and Europe.

Critics argue for the need to complement big data with data ethnography and qualitative research. Semi-structured interviews and participatory research help uncover the social contexts behind data points. Without such methods, AI systems risk embedding and reproducing the same structural biases that shape current development models.

Looking Ahead

The shift from MDGs to SDGs introduced measurable targets, but the overemphasis on quantitative indicators could undermine the understanding of poverty as a complex, context-specific issue. While the MDGs struggled due to data gaps, the SDGs may now rely too heavily on numbers that fail to reflect lived experience. To build a more accurate and inclusive global development agenda, future efforts can potentially embrace a multidimensional approach—one that incorporates local knowledge, cultural context and qualitative insights.

– Autumn Joseph

Autumn is based in London, UK and focuses on Business and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

UK Foreign Aid Shift Risks Global Poverty Efforts

UK Foreign Aid Shift Risks Global Poverty EffortsThe United Kingdom’s (U.K.) foreign aid budget and international policies continue to shift, sparking concerns about their impact on global poverty alleviation. The government has committed to maintaining aid at 0.5% of Gross National Income (GNI) until at least 2029. However, critics argue that reallocating aid resources limits the reach of poverty-focused initiatives worldwide.

Aid Budget Cuts and Spending Priorities

Since 2020, the U.K. has reduced its foreign aid budget from 0.7% to 0.5% of GNI. This cut remains in place despite earlier promises to restore the higher level when economic conditions improve. A significant portion of the current aid budget now covers in-donor refugee costs. In 2022, 29% of total Official Development Assistance (ODA) supported domestic refugee programs. That percentage increased further in 2023 due to rising migration and asylum pressures. These changes have fueled debates about whether the U.K. has diverted funds meant for international aid toward internal expenditures.

Cutting Global Health Funding

The U.K. also plans to reduce its contributions to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi), an organization that has vaccinated more than a billion children in developing countries and prevented nearly 18 million deaths over the past 25 years. As U.K. funding declines, Gavi’s capacity to distribute vaccines in vulnerable regions weakens. Aid organizations warn that these cuts could reverse progress in child mortality reduction and burden already fragile health care systems.

Tougher Refugee Citizenship Policies

The U.K. government has tightened refugee policies, making it harder for those arriving through unauthorized routes to gain British citizenship. Refugees who entered the country irregularly now face disqualification from citizenship applications. Critics argue that this policy contradicts the 1951 Refugee Convention and leaves many asylum seekers in legal limbo without a clear path to permanent residency.

Military Aid vs. Development Aid

While the U.K. reduces funding for health and humanitarian programs, it has significantly increased military assistance. Since February 2022, the U.K. has committed £12.8 billion in support to Ukraine, including £7.8 billion for military aid. In 2024/25 alone, the U.K. pledged £4.5 billion in military support. This shift reflects a growing focus on security rather than direct development initiatives, raising questions about the balance between defense spending and poverty reduction efforts.

The Future of UK Aid

The U.K.’s evolving aid priorities highlight an ongoing debate about the nation’s role in global development. The government defends its spending decisions, citing economic constraints and domestic pressures. However, critics argue that cutting aid to health, education and humanitarian projects undermines the U.K.’s leadership in poverty reduction and global health initiatives.

Looking Ahead

The Labour government, elected in July 2024, has emphasized poverty reduction, climate finance and gender equality as key aid priorities. Officials plan to release spending strategies for 2025/26 in the summer of 2025, with expectations of further refinements to aid allocation. The U.K.’s climate, humanitarian and health-related aid programs will likely face continued scrutiny amid shifting budget priorities. As international needs grow due to climate change, global health crises and conflict, the direction of U.K. aid could play a crucial role in shaping the future of vulnerable communities worldwide. Ensuring aid allocation aligns with poverty reduction goals remains essential to sustaining progress in global development.

– Arianna Distefano

Arianna is based in London, UK and focuses on Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Bridge International Academies: Education and the Poverty Cycle

Bridge International AcademiesAccess to quality education can transform lives, offering children in low-income communities a way out of poverty. Studies reveal that individuals with higher levels of education earn more, live healthier lives and contribute to their communities. However, educational inequality still hinders millions of children from accessing quality schooling, making it challenging to break the poverty cycle. The following explores the success stories of organizations like Bridge International Academies, where education has changed communities and highlights the obstacles that still prevent it from reaching all who need it. 

Transforming Lives in Low-Income Communities

The link between education and poverty alleviation is well-documented. Children who receive quality education acquire skills to secure better jobs, earn higher incomes and lift themselves out of poverty. In countries such as Bangladesh and Kenya, organizations have invested in educating children from impoverished backgrounds to create generational change.

For example, the nonprofit organization Bridge International Academies in Kenya provides affordable, high-quality education in underserved communities. With more than 500 schools across Kenya, Uganda and Nigeria, Bridge International has helped students achieve scores significantly above national averages, creating a pathway out of poverty for thousands of students. Through affordable tuition, comprehensive teacher training and tech-integrated classrooms, Bridge International exemplifies how education can change the trajectory of low-income communities.

In Bangladesh, BRAC operates one of the largest education programs in the world. BRAC’s education model empowers young girls in rural villages to attend primary and secondary school. BRAC has proven that education dramatically reduces poverty and gender inequality: its alumni reveal a 30% increase in household income compared to nonparticipants, effectively breaking the poverty cycle within these communities. By prioritizing girls’ education, BRAC addresses poverty and promotes gender equity. 

Challenges

Despite these successes, significant obstacles remain in delivering quality education to all children in poverty. In many developing countries, children face barriers, including inadequate school infrastructure, a shortage of qualified teachers and insufficient government funding.

  • Inadequate Funding for Education Programs. Underfunded schools lack necessary resources like textbooks, desks and classroom materials, limiting students’ learning experiences. In Sub-Saharan Africa, about 20% of primary school-age children are out of school, largely due to underfunded education systems. Low-income communities often depend on external aid, which can be inconsistent or insufficient to meet UNICEF’s demand.
  • Teacher Shortages and Training Gaps. In many impoverished regions, schools face severe teacher shortages and available teachers may lack proper training. A well-trained teacher improves student outcomes, but in places like rural India and Sub-Saharan Africa, underqualified teachers remain a common challenge. In response, organizations such as Teach For All recruit and train local educators to improve teaching quality in low-income communities.
  • Gender Inequality in Education Access. Girls in low-income regions face additional hurdles, such as early marriage, household responsibilities and cultural biases that prioritize boys’ education over girls’. According to UNESCO, girls make up 48% of the global out-of-school population. Programs like BRAC’s girls’ education initiatives work to reverse these ongoing trends by ensuring girls receive equal access to education, empowering them to contribute economically and socially to their communities.
  • Impact of Conflict on Education. Conflict-affected regions suffer severe setbacks in education access, as schools may be destroyed, occupied or unsafe for children. For instance, in countries like Syria and Yemen, millions of children cannot attend school due to ongoing violence. Organizations like UNICEF provide emergency education resources in these areas, but the instability makes it challenging to establish consistent educational progress.

Moving Forward

Ending poverty through education requires global cooperation and sustained investment in educational access and quality. Governments, NGOs and private organizations must work together to fund schools, train teachers and ensure equitable access to education. Programs that prioritize marginalized groups, improve teaching quality and address barriers like gender inequality and conflict could create the most substantial impact.

Countries that prioritize education see the rewards in their workforce, economy and social development. Bridge International Academies, BRAC and Teach For All demonstrate that breaking the poverty cycle through education is possible. While significant challenges remain, these success stories underscore the transformative power of education in reducing poverty globally.

– Olivia Barker

Olivia is based in the UK and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, , , ,

How Supporting Poverty Eradication Benefits Global Business

How Supporting Poverty Eradication Benefits Global BusinessWith more than 700 million people worldwide living in extreme poverty—defined as surviving on less than $1.90 per day—poverty remains a pressing issue that impacts both individuals and economies on a global scale. Businesses have a unique opportunity to contribute to poverty eradication while simultaneously achieving significant benefits, including brand loyalty, sustainable growth and stronger, more resilient supply chains. Supporting poverty eradication is not only a moral imperative but also a sound business strategy that aligns with long-term corporate sustainability goals.

The Business Case for Supporting Poverty Eradication

Poverty reduction creates economic opportunities that benefit businesses in various ways. As incomes rise, more people can potentially afford goods and services, directly expanding the consumer base for companies. For instance, when businesses invest in fair wages and decent working conditions, they build a more reliable, engaged and productive workforce. Supporting poverty eradication also cultivates a positive brand reputation.

Companies actively working to reduce poverty attract consumers who value corporate responsibility, as studies reveal, consumers increasingly favor businesses aligned with social impact initiatives. Moreover, poverty eradication promotes social stability, which is essential for a thriving global economy. Poverty often correlates with social unrest, political instability and migration issues, all of which can disrupt business operations and supply chains. 

Strategies for Businesses to Support Poverty Eradication

Businesses could support poverty eradication through strategic actions focused on fair labor practices, community development and sustainable supply chains. Here are three effective strategies:

  1. Ensure Decent Work Conditions. An effective way for companies to support poverty eradication is to ensure decent work conditions within their organizations and supply chains. Decent work, as defined by the International Labour Organization (ILO), includes fair wages, safe work environments and equal opportunities for all. A business that provides fair wages and adequate social protections enables its employees to achieve a higher standard of living, which lifts entire communities out of poverty.
  2. Adopt Sustainable Procurement Practices. Businesses have considerable influence as buyers, particularly in sectors that rely on extensive supply chains. By adopting sustainable procurement practices, companies can prevent poverty-related issues within their supply chains. For instance, businesses can conduct human rights due diligence to identify potential poverty risks, such as child labor or exploitative wages and address them directly. Sustainable procurement also includes sourcing materials from ethical suppliers and prioritizing fair trade partners, which strengthens global supply chains and reduces poverty.
  3. Invest in Community Development and Education. Investing in community development programs and education can create lasting social and economic benefits. Companies that contribute to local infrastructure, health or educational initiatives improve the overall well-being of the communities where they operate. Programs that provide skills training and resources for entrepreneurship empower individuals to generate income and establish local businesses, creating a multiplier effect that stimulates the economy and alleviates poverty.

The Global Impact

The global impact of business support for poverty eradication extends far beyond individual companies or communities. When businesses commit to poverty eradication, they contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 1: No Poverty. Such commitments promote economic inclusivity, gender equality and environmental sustainability, which are essential for a balanced global economy. As businesses align with the SDGs, they drive sustainable development and support the vision of a world where no one is left behind.

Supporting poverty eradication is also critical in addressing urgent global challenges such as climate change and migration. Poverty often forces people to rely on environmentally harmful practices like deforestation and overfishing, which exacerbate climate change. Additionally, poverty-driven migration can strain resources in neighboring regions, creating humanitarian crises. By helping eradicate poverty, businesses play a role in mitigating these interconnected issues, making a significant contribution to global stability and resilience.

A Sustainable Future Built on Poverty Eradication

Supporting poverty eradication is good for business and it fosters a sustainable future where companies, communities and economies can potentially thrive. Businesses that prioritize fair labor practices, ethical sourcing and community development enhance their reputation and build a loyal consumer base while contributing to global stability. By embracing these strategies, companies play a crucial role in creating an equitable world, ensuring a positive legacy that supports economic and social progress for generations to come.

– Olivia Barker

Olivia is based in Guildford, Surrey, UK and focuses on Business and New Markets for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

TECHO: Harnessing Drone Technology to Combat Global Poverty

TECHOAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 2 billion people live beyond the reach of essential medicines and quality health care. However, drone technology is helping resolve this “last mile” problem. In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), more than 200 million people face poverty, struggling without access to basic needs such as clean water, housing and electricity. The World Bank estimates that as of 2023, one in four people in these regions lives on less than $6.85 per day, a clear reflection of widespread poverty. While there was a slight 1% decrease in poverty rates between 2022 and 2023, projections indicate that without further intervention, progress may stagnate.

TECHO: Housing and Social Programs

Founded in 1997, TECHO is a nonprofit organization that mobilizes youth volunteers to combat extreme poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean. The organization’s mission includes providing housing, clean water and access to social inclusion programs. In the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, TECHO was among the first groups to initiate reconstruction. Indeed, the organization was able to rebuild 10,000 homes. Currently, with the help of more than 500,000 volunteers, the organization has constructed homes for more than 86,000 families across 19 countries.

Advancements Through Drone Technology

In 2019, TECHO and DroneDeploy collaborated to enhance TECHO’s home rebuilding efforts in Brazil through drone technology. This partnership helped 634 communities by employing drone mapping—a technique involving aerial photography that produces comprehensive 3D visual maps. These maps improve visibility in urban settings, helping identify critical areas needing attention and the optimal approaches for intervention. The use of drones enabled TECHO to accurately assess the number of families living in poverty and in substandard conditions, pinpointing risk areas to prioritize for high-quality housing reconstruction.

Enhancing Urban Planning and Infrastructure in São Paulo

In São Paulo, TECHO aimed to introduce various social inclusion programs targeting poverty eradication and community integration. It expanded its partnership with DroneDeploy to use drones for assessing housing needs, a task complicated by often outdated data. Drones provided a precise count of families requiring improved living conditions and basic services like clean water, sewage and electricity. For instance, initial estimates suggested that a community housed 250 families; however, drone surveys revealed the actual number to be at least 520. This accurate data is crucial for TECHO to allocate sufficient resources to these communities effectively.

Looking Ahead

TECHO’s initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean aim to address the widespread poverty affecting millions in the region. Indeed, by leveraging drone technology, the organization has been able to precisely assess housing needs. Furthermore, drones have been able to identify the most vulnerable areas for targeted intervention. In São Paulo, drones revealed a significant undercount in the number of families living in poor conditions, allowing TECHO to more efficiently allocate resources. These ongoing efforts underscore the importance of innovative approaches to tackling poverty and improving living conditions across the region.

– Charlotte Johnston

Charlotte is based in London, UK and focuses on Good News and Technology for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr