• Link to X
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to TikTok
  • Link to Youtube
  • About
    • About Us
      • President
      • Board of Directors
      • Board of Advisors
      • Financials
      • Our Methodology
      • Success Tracker
      • Contact
  • Act Now
    • 30 Ways to Help
      • Email Congress
      • Call Congress
      • Volunteer
      • Courses & Certificates
      • Be a Donor
    • Internships
      • In-Office Internships
      • Remote Internships
    • Legislation
      • Politics 101
  • The Blog
  • The Podcast
  • Magazine
  • Donate
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Archive for category: Development

Information and stories on development news.

Development, Economy, Global Poverty

Digital ID Reform Offers Update on SDG 10 in Nigeria

SDG 10 in NigeriaThis update on SDG 10 in Nigeria centers on a legislative reform reshaping who can participate in the country’s formal economy in an era where digitalization serves as a prerequisite for economic development. Across Nigeria’s markets and workshops, banks and insurers often deny small business owners credit extensions and insurance policies because the owners cannot provide recognized proof of identity. This gap kept millions of Nigerians out of the country’s formal financial system for decades, preventing them from opening bank accounts, securing loans or growing their businesses beyond cash transactions. 

Nigeria’s poverty rate illustrates the scale of what is at stake. The World Bank reported in 2026 that the share of Nigerians living below the national poverty line rose to an estimated 63%, up from 61% the previous year. Financial exclusion compounds that poverty. Without access to credit, savings or insurance, low income households have fewer tools to absorb shocks like illness or crop failure, and small businesses cannot grow beyond what cash on hand permits. Expanding financial access cannot eliminate poverty on its own, though it removes one of the structural barriers preventing people from building financial resilience – the exact goal SDG 10 sets.

In June 2026, Nigeria signed the National Identity Management Commission Act into law – a reform officials say is designed to expand financial inclusion in Nigeria by giving citizens a single, trusted form of identification. The law replaces its former 2007 framework that fragmented the country’s identity system across competing databases. The reform in Nigeria reflects a commitment to United Nations SDG 10, which calls on countries to reduce inequality by expanding the social and economic inclusion of marginalized populations by 2030.

A New Legal Foundation

President Bola Tinubu signed the NIMC Act 2026 into law at the State House in Abuja on Friday, June 26, 2026, according to a statement from the presidency. The Senate President, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Attorney General, the Interior Minister and a World Bank representative witnessed the signing. The law establishes the National Identification Number as what officials describe as the single source of truth for identity verification across government and financial services. Nigerians already use the number for passport issuance and renewal, and banks and insurance companies are integrating it into their systems, according to Leadership newspaper.

A Market Already Taking Shape

The digital economy’s contribution to Nigeria’s gross domestic product has risen from about 16% to roughly 19% in recent years, Bosun Tijani, the Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, said in November 2025. The government is targeting a $1 trillion economy overall, with the digital sector accounting for 21% of GDP by 2027, Tijani said.

Global companies have already found opportunity in Nigeria’s identity infrastructure. In 2013, the National Identity Management Commission partnered with Mastercard, the American payments company, on a pilot program to issue 13 million Mastercard-branded identity cards combining biometric verification with electronic payment functions.

Nigeria’s identity system has since moved toward a domestic card scheme called AfriGo, which the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System operate. Nonetheless, the Mastercard partnership was an early demonstration that Nigeria’s push toward digital identity holds visible commercial value for global payment providers.

The World Bank’s Wider Bet

Nigeria’s NIMC reform corresponds with a larger effort backed by the World Bank. Its Global Digital Public Infrastructure Program, launched in May 2026, funds digital identity, fast payments and secure data-sharing systems that banks, insurers and other private companies can build services around. This serves to extend, spanning financial inclusion in Nigeria and comparable markets to populations previously unreachable by formal lenders. The program estimates that 2.9 billion people worldwide currently lack a digital identity for online transactions, with only 8% of lower middle-income countries and 16% of upper middle-income countries having fast, inclusive payment systems in place.

In Nigeria specifically, that connection is already visible. According to the World Bank, the government’s rollout of targeted cash transfers for 15 million vulnerable households has moved more slowly than planned because it depends on integrating the national identity management system. In other words, the same infrastructure this reform strengthens is the mechanism the government relies on to identify and pay Nigeria’s poorest households directly, rather than through intermediaries who can introduce delay or leakage.

A World Bank representative attended the NIMC Act signing in Abuja, positioning Nigeria as an early participant in the program’s venture into Sub-Saharan Africa. A growing share of the population once locked out of the formal economy is approaching the threshold banks and insurers require before extending credit, savings products and coverage. As more Nigerians gain recognized identification, product lines that were commercially unviable for a fragmented, undocumented customer base start to fall under business logic.

Looking Ahead

With a $1 trillion economic target on the horizon and financial inclusion advancing alongside it, this update on SDG 10 in Nigeria points to a country using digital infrastructure to pursue the UN’s 2030 inclusion goals. For a country where more than 60% of the population lives in poverty, closing the identity gap is a foundational step toward opening a new consumer market and reaching the people that market has excluded.

– Gayatri Lilly Sabharwal

Gayatri is based in London, UK and focuses on Business and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

September 6, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Jennifer Philipp https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Jennifer Philipp2026-09-06 03:00:012026-09-06 01:57:04Digital ID Reform Offers Update on SDG 10 in Nigeria
Development, Education, Global Poverty

Higher Education in Slovenia

Higher Education in SloveniaSlovenia has built one of Europe’s stronger higher education systems, and higher education in Slovenia plays a direct role in the country’s fight against poverty. Roughly half of all Slovenians between the ages of 19 and 24 are enrolled in tertiary education, and most never see a tuition bill. Undergraduate study at public universities is free for Slovenian and EU students who attend full-time, and about 74% of all students paid no tuition fees in the 2024/2025 academic year. That investment has paid off in rising attainment: 43.1% of Slovenians aged 25 to 34 now hold a tertiary degree, up from 31.3% in 2015 and just short of the European Union average of 44.2%. Last year, 16,629 students completed a tertiary degree in the country, 3.2% more than the year before, continuing a decade-long climb in the share of young adults with a university education.

The Costs of Higher Education in Slovenia

Free tuition, however, does not guarantee equal opportunity. Students from low-income families, rural areas and other underrepresented groups often struggle to cover the costs that surround the classroom rather than the classroom itself: housing, food, transportation and books. Monthly living costs for students in Slovenia typically run between €500 and €800, with dormitory rooms costing €120 to €200 a month and private shared apartments running €250 to €350 per person, expenses that weigh most heavily on students who cannot rely on family support and that can push young people from poorer or rural households to skip university altogether.

The gap shows up starkly in outcomes. Among Slovenians whose parents hold a tertiary degree, 74% go on to earn one themselves. Among those whose parents did not finish upper secondary school, only 16% do, one of the widest such gaps that the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) tracked. That 58-percentage-point divide illustrates how a family’s financial and educational background, not a student’s ability, can still decide who reaches a university classroom in Slovenia.

Scholarship Programs

To narrow that gap, the Slovenian government funds several scholarship programs aimed at the students who need help the most. Need-based state scholarships, reserved for students from financially disadvantaged families, reached 46.7% of full-time undergraduate students and 24.3% of master’s students in the 2021/2022 academic year, making them the most widely used form of student aid in the country. Merit-based Zois scholarships support high-achieving students regardless of income, and the Public Scholarship, Development, Disability and Maintenance Fund separately awards roughly 1,000 new scholarships each year to students training for occupations facing labor shortages, worth €118.48 a month, with total recipients numbering 2,890 as of the end of 2023. Together, these programs are designed so that a student’s financial background does not determine whether they can finish a degree.

The Erasmus+ Program

Slovenia is also working to modernize its higher education system through participation in the Erasmus+ program, which lets students study at universities across Europe, build professional skills and connect with international peers. Almost 5,000 Slovenian students took part in Erasmus+ exchanges in 2023 alone, a 50% increase over 2019, and more than 31,000 Slovenian students have studied abroad through the program over the past decade. These placements help prepare graduates for an increasingly international job market while bringing new teaching methods and fresh ideas back into Slovenian classrooms.

The Slovenian Human Resources Development and Scholarship Fund

Nonprofit organizations reinforce this work. The Slovenian Human Resources Development and Scholarship Fund, the country’s central scholarship body, runs multiple programs that fund undergraduate, graduate and doctoral study for both Slovenian citizens and international students, in some cases covering tuition and living costs for recipients who could not otherwise afford them. The fund also finances researcher mobility and support for lifelong learning, helping students and workers continue building skills well beyond a single degree.

Looking Ahead

A college degree remains one of the most reliable paths out of poverty and into long-term economic security. Slovenian tertiary graduates face an unemployment rate of just 3.5%, compared with 11.4% for those who did not complete upper secondary school, and graduates typically earn more and change jobs less often than their less-educated peers. By continuing to fund scholarships, expand exchange programs like Erasmus+ and invest in partners like the Slovenian Human Resources Development and Scholarship Fund, Slovenia is working to make sure that a student’s family income says less about their future than their own effort does.

– Rachel Ma

Rachel is based in Florham Park, NJ, USA and focuses on Technology and Solutions for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

September 5, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Jennifer Philipp https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Jennifer Philipp2026-09-05 01:30:422026-09-04 14:30:41Higher Education in Slovenia
Development, Economy, Global Poverty

Small Countries Reducing Poverty

small country reducing povertyWhen people discuss global poverty reduction, they often focus on large economies like China or India. However, several smaller nations have achieved remarkable progress through targeted social programs, strong public investment and people-centered development strategies. These examples show how small countries reducing poverty can create meaningful change despite limited resources.

Many of these nations prioritize health care, education, environmental sustainability and social protection. Their success demonstrates that governments do not need massive populations or global economic dominance to improve quality of life and reduce poverty.

Costa Rica: Prioritizing People Over Military Spending

Costa Rica stands out as one of the strongest examples of a small country reducing poverty through long-term social investment. In 1948, Costa Rica abolished its military and redirected funding toward education, health care and public welfare.

This decision helped create one of the most stable social systems in Latin America. According to the World Bank, Costa Rica built a health care system that covers nearly the entire population while also maintaining high literacy and life expectancy rates.

Costa Rica also invested heavily in rural electrification, clean water access and environmental protection. The country now generates most of its electricity from renewable energy sources, which supports sustainable economic growth.

These policies reduced poverty while improving public health and economic opportunity. Costa Rica proves that governments can strengthen human development when they prioritize social investment over military expansion.

Uruguay: Building Strong Social Protection Systems

Another example of a small country reducing poverty is Uruguay. Although Uruguay has a relatively small population, it developed one of the strongest welfare systems in Latin America. The government expanded pensions, unemployment support and health care coverage while increasing access to education. Uruguay also implemented labor protections that strengthened wages and worker rights.

According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Uruguay consistently ranks among the countries with the lowest poverty and inequality levels in the region.

Uruguay’s economic strategy also focused on inclusion. Rather than concentrating growth among elites, policymakers expanded benefits to lower-income households and rural communities. This approach increased economic stability and reduced vulnerability during financial downturns.

The country demonstrates how democratic institutions and social spending can help small nations achieve lasting poverty reduction.

Bhutan: Progress Beyond Economic Growth

Bhutan offers a unique insight into how small countries reduce poverty as it measures national success differently from most countries. Instead of focusing only on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Bhutan promotes the concept of Gross National Happiness (GNH). This concept emphasizes sustainable development, cultural preservation, environmental conservation and good governance. While Bhutan still faces economic challenges, the country has significantly reduced poverty over the last two decades.

According to the World Bank, Bhutan reduced poverty from 23.2% in 2007 to 8.2% in 2017 through investments in infrastructure, agriculture and social services.

Bhutan expanded road networks, improved rural health care access and increased school enrollment across remote communities. Hydropower exports also generated revenue that supported public programs.

This country’s development model shows that economic progress does not need to come at the expense of environmental sustainability or social well-being.

Mauritius: Diversifying Economy

Mauritius transformed itself from a low-income agricultural economy into an upper-middle-income country through diversification and investment in human capital. During the ’60s, many predicted economic difficulties because Mauritius relied heavily on sugar exports. However, the government expanded into tourism, manufacturing and financial services while investing in education and infrastructure.

The World Bank credits Mauritius with maintaining strong growth and reducing poverty through inclusive economic reform.

Mauritius also developed trade partnerships and encouraged foreign investment, which created jobs and increased income opportunities. Free education and health care strengthened social mobility and supported long-term development.

The country’s success demonstrates how smaller economies can adapt and compete globally through strategic planning and inclusive growth, moving itself away from the effects of poverty.

Important Lessons from Small Nations

The successes of these countries reveal several patterns behind small countries reducing poverty: Governments invested in health care and education. Leaders prioritized long-term human development. Social protection systems supported vulnerable populations. Economic growth reached rural and low-income communities. Policymakers emphasized sustainability and inclusion.

These nations also adapted policies to fit local conditions rather than copying outside models without modification. These examples are important to highlight because they demonstrate that poverty reduction remains available with the right policies and political commitment.

Global poverty still affects hundreds of millions of people, but the achievements of these smaller nations provide hope and practical guidance for others to follow. As governments continue to work toward the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), these examples of small countries reducing poverty remind the world that size does not determine impact. Strong social policies, inclusive economic growth and investment in people can help nations build a more equitable future.

– Leah Denning

Leah is based in Bristol, UK and focuses on Good News and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

July 9, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Lynsey Alexander https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Lynsey Alexander2026-07-09 01:30:582026-07-08 13:14:17Small Countries Reducing Poverty
Development, Global Poverty, Legislations and Policies, Poverty Reduction

3 Things To Know About Fragility and Rule of Law in the Maldives

Fragility and Rule of Law in the MaldivesThe Maldives — a modern honeymooning paradise. However, when it comes to fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives, recent years show mixed success, creating areas of vulnerability that have the potential to undermine the protection of its population. Yet, the country has made real progress, especially with the entrenchment of the separation of powers in the 2008 constitution, making the country increasingly democratically robust and building a more reliable legal framework for the Maldivian people.

The Rule of Law and Poverty in the Maldives

Fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives are deeply interconnected: where legal institutions are weak or politically compromised, the state struggles to protect its citizens, enforce rights equally or hold the powerful to account. The Maldives presents a compelling case study in this dynamic. As a small island nation heavily dependent on tourism revenue, it faces unique vulnerabilities — including economic inequality, geographic dispersal across atolls and limited institutional capacity — that can compound fragility in its legal system.

These structural pressures have a direct bearing on poverty and access to justice. According to the World Bank, while the Maldives has achieved relatively low headline poverty rates, significant inequality persists between the capital Malé and the outer islands, where public services — including legal aid and court access — are far less available. For citizens living in poverty, particularly those outside the capital, navigating the justice system is a considerable challenge: legal representation is costly, travel to courts is expensive and awareness of legal rights remains uneven. This means that when fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives are under strain — whether through judicial interference, restricted press freedom, or concentrated executive power — it is those already marginalized by poverty who are most exposed to the consequences. Here are three key things to know about its recent state:

1. Reforms

The People’s Majlis (Maldivian Parliament) has driven recent legal reforms and amendments that promote human rights, more effective governance and environmental protection. For example, the legislature revised the Maldives Penal Code to move away from punitive measures and instead foster a rehabilitative approach by decriminalizing certain offences. A marked swell toward reforms that aim to enhance legal accountability has emerged, directly addressing fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives. These moves from the central government have had a tone-setting effect on the citizens of the Maldives, fostering an active rights-aware society that can continue to effectively pressure the government into reducing fragility and promoting democracy.

2. Threats to Judicial Independence

However, despite promising moves since 2008, this fledgling democracy certainly has some unavoidable cracks in the robustness of the rule of law, which have become particularly visible since President Muizzu took office. The tightening of media control and the restriction on protests and journalists reveals the fragility in the 2008 constitution. Most notably, threats have come from a subversion of judicial independence, where the executive allegedly suspended three Supreme Court justices in an alleged intimidation attempt to secure their support for the government during a constitutional review. This threat also drew attention in a joint submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review in April 2025, which highlighted elements of fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives as areas of serious concern.

3. Response to Fragility

Despite this threat, one cannot ignore that while the Maldivian people have experienced some threats to the rule of law — due to corruption and the concentration of power within the executive branch of government — significant moves exist to redress this overreach of power, ultimately aiming to retain power in the hands of public interest. This includes the drafting of an Asset Declaration Bill, as well as the Anti-Corruption Commission expanding its presence. Equally, the role of other power-limiting institutions like the Bar Council is being clearly exercised through their call for President Muizzu to return the bill — which had stripped the three Supreme Court judges of their positions — back to Parliament for revision.

Looking Ahead

It is clear that while threats have certainly tested fragility and the rule of law in the Maldives, overall the country demonstrates clear momentum in continually reducing fragility and ultimately improving and bolstering the protection of citizens in this evolving democracy.

– Amy Carpenter

Amy is based in London, UK and focuses on Good News and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pexels

July 7, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Jennifer Philipp https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Jennifer Philipp2026-07-07 03:00:572026-07-07 01:36:303 Things To Know About Fragility and Rule of Law in the Maldives
Development, Economy, Global Poverty

Bangladesh’s Trillion-Dollar Economy Plan

Bangladesh's Trillion-Dollar Economy PlanBangladesh has spent the past few years navigating political and economic challenges, with poverty still affecting many rural communities where access to adequate income and food remains limited. In response, the government has been actively pursuing strategies to stabilize and strengthen the economy. Most notably, the finance minister recently confirmed Bangladesh’s trillion-dollar economy plan, targeting economic growth to reach the milestone by 2034.

While this goal may seem distant, economic transformation is rarely immediate. Sustainable growth requires consistent policy implementation, structural reforms and time for these changes to yield stable, measurable results.

What Is the Plan for Achieving This Goal?

Bangladesh’s biggest source of financial support comes from the garment sector. However, the country might face a shock due to its standard approach to this sector. If an economy wants to thrive, it needs diversity to achieve its goals.

The government has prepared a plan and is considering investing more money, creating jobs across various sectors, democratizing the economy and opening new sectors in creative fields and sports. The main reason is to give the country a range of options and help it become part of Bangladesh’s trillion-dollar economy plan. However, looking at the figures for the last financial year, economic growth was 0.48% lower than expected, mainly because it relied heavily on the service and agriculture sectors to generate that profit. 

Therefore, the government has developed this diversity plan to achieve this goal. Bangladesh attracted significant foreign investment, with its strongest year recorded in 2019 when direct investment exceeded $1.8 billion. However, political upheaval and internal ambiguity led to a decline in investment levels in subsequent years.

Despite these challenges, 2025 marked a recovery year for Bangladesh, with direct investment rising to $1.77 billion. Although this figure remains below the 2019 peak, it shows that foreign investors are still interested in investing in the country despite the global financial situation.

Bangladesh and the International Monetary Fund

Earlier in April 2026, discussions during a meeting in Washington, D.C. raised concerns about Bangladesh’s financial situation. Although Bangladesh was approved for more than $5 billion in IMF loans between January 2023 and June 2025, the country has received only about $3.64 billion so far, with nearly $2 billion still pending for future disbursement.

The program was not designed to give the country the money for free; it came with conditions, such as increasing government revenue and strengthening oversight of the banking sector. Bangladesh agreed to these terms before signing the deal, as the measures were intended to support stronger long-term financial stability.

If Bangladesh is serious about becoming a trillion-dollar economy by 2034, it must take economic diversification more seriously, as the country still relies heavily on the garment sector and foreign direct investment. The government also needs to reform trade policies, strengthen sustainability measures and address key industry challenges to protect long-term growth.

Final Thoughts

Bangladesh aims to expand investment into higher-value sectors such as banking, insurance, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals to strengthen long-term financial stability and maintain steady investment inflows. Diversifying the economy is considered essential to the country’s goal of becoming a trillion-dollar economy by 2034, as it would create multiple sources of revenue and improve resilience during financial issues.

These are challenges Bangladesh can overcome. Over the past 30 years, the country has shown remarkable economic resilience through a hardworking labor force, a dynamic private sector and strong financial flows.

– Sibel Yasharoglu

Sibel is based in Leicester, UK and focuses on Business and Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

May 27, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Lynsey 2 https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Lynsey 22026-05-27 01:30:472026-05-26 12:24:16Bangladesh’s Trillion-Dollar Economy Plan
Development, Global Poverty

The Monsoon’s Aftermath: Structural Reforms in Bangladesh

Structural Reforms in BangladeshThe year 2024 was a monumental time for Bangladesh as protests rocked the nation for three months, culminating in the previous government being forced to resign. Immediately, the interim government was tasked with implementing various structural reforms in order to address the numerous systemic problems facing the average citizen in Bangladesh, including continued vulnerabilities within the financial sector, rising inflation and decreased GDP growth.

Transitional Power

Even before the Monsoon Revolution, Bangladesh was experiencing momentum in economic growth. Implementing trade reforms and export diversification helped to sustain growth as inflationary pressure eased and external conditions improved.

However, that was off the back of 15 years of consolidated power, weakening civilian institutions and using force to suppress critics and opposition members of the government.

Now that the regime had been ousted and the new interim government put in its place, it was immediately faced with the structural pressures a less-than-peaceful transition of power brings about.

The new prime minister laid out a roadmap centered on reform of the financial sector and economic stabilization. Policies such as restoring the independence of the Bangladesh Bank, deregulating the financial market and accelerating reforms to improve revenue mobilization were implemented. These reforms are intended to ensure a gradual ease in doing business in the country and macroeconomic stabilization.

The new ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party has also made other reforms part of its platform, including combating corruption with a stated zero-tolerance policy. The party has addressed the disparity between the rich and poor, looking to create an Economic Reform Commission to address the gap through the “equitable distribution of growth benefits, upholding equality, human dignity, and social justice.” The party also plans to bring fair wages for the working class and reform labor laws to create better working environments.

Looking Ahead

Since the July Uprising, Bangladesh has been in a state of transition across its economy, politics and standard of living. With structural reforms being passed and plans laid out to address the systemic issues in Bangladesh, the effectiveness of the new government’s approach will become clearer over time.

– Alexander Petrov

Alexander is based in Boston, MA, USA and focuses on Business and Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

May 23, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Precious Sheidu https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Precious Sheidu2026-05-23 01:30:232026-05-23 11:46:35The Monsoon’s Aftermath: Structural Reforms in Bangladesh
Development, Global Poverty

Rural Poverty in Kazakhstan and Efforts to Bridge the Gap

Rural Poverty in KazakhstanAlthough Kazakhstan is the largest economy in Central Asia, economic inequality between the city and the village remains a significant problem. The country has experienced substantial economic growth, largely driven by oil and natural resources exports. However, this progress has not benefited all regions equally, highlighting rural poverty in Kazakhstan. Rural communities continue to face wider unemployment, lower wages, and limited access to education, health care and infrastructure compared to urban communities.

Background

According to Kazakhstan’s Bureau of National Statistics, the poverty rate in urban areas is 3.9%, while in rural areas it reaches 7.2%, nearly twice as high. This gap is pronounced more in highly industrialized regions. In Ulytau, the country’s main coal and metal-producing region, poverty in urban areas is 2.2% compared to 12.1% in rural areas. Several western and central regions with a dominating extractive industry show similar trends. This suggests that economic growth driven by major industries did not benefit rural areas of the country equally. While industrial centers attract investments, nearby rural populations continue to experience limited access to jobs and higher incomes.

Low Productivity of the Agricultural Sector

Rural poverty in Kazakhstan is often linked to the low productivity of the agricultural sector. Agriculture generates only 4% of the country’s GDP, yet it employs 15% of the working-age population, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Additionally, agriculture remains one of the lowest-paid sectors in Kazakhstan. The Bureau of National Statistics reported that the average monthly salary in agriculture, fishing and forestry reached 263,517 tenge in 2024, which is significantly below the national average of 405,416 tenge.

The contrast becomes even more striking when compared to the extractive industries. Mining and quarrying workers earned an average of 866,486 tenge per month, more than three times higher than agricultural workers. These differences demonstrate that Kazakhstan’s natural resource-driven economic growth has benefited industrial sectors far more than rural agricultural communities, contributing to economic inequality and strengthening rural poverty.

Poor Infrastructure

Poor infrastructure remains one of the main problems in rural communities in Kazakhstan, particularly in the education sector. According to government data, 57% of three-shift schools and 76% of schools under state of emergency are located in rural areas. Many rural schools continue to experience a shortage of essential equipment, qualified teachers and reliable internet access, which limits educational opportunities for rural students. The World Bank data confirms this, according to which students from cities perform much better than their peers from villages. Such disparities in education and infrastructure create serious long-term obstacles for rural populations in overcoming poverty in Kazakhstan and gaining essential qualifications for high-income jobs.

Government Initiatives

The government of Kazakhstan has introduced several initiatives to reduce inequality between urban and rural communities. As part of the Rural Development Concept, authorities plan to build around 180 new rural schools by 2027 and continue modernizing existing educational institutions. Since 2022, the “Development of the Potential of Reference Schools in Rural Areas” program has upgraded thousands of classrooms with modern equipment and educational technologies.

The government has also implemented measures to attract qualified teachers to villages by offering salary bonuses, relocation assistance and housing loans through the “With a Diploma to Rural Areas” program.

International organizations have also supported long-term rural development efforts in Kazakhstan through infrastructure and agricultural modernization projects. The World Bank supported the Second Irrigation and Drainage Improvement Project with a $102.9 million loan to modernize irrigation systems in southern Kazakhstan. The program helped improve water access for approximately 40,000 farming households and modernized irrigation infrastructure across more than 100,000 hectares of land, improving agricultural productivity and water efficiency.

The World Bank has also invested in large-scale transportation projects designed to reduce regional inequality and improve connectivity in remote areas. Since 2009, the South-West and East-West Road Projects have connected approximately 5.5 million people in regions including Kyzylorda Region, Zhambyl Region and Turkistan Region. According to the organization, these projects improved access to essential services, created 50,000 new jobs in construction and more than 1,200 permanent roles in road maintenance for residents.

– Dias Assan

Dias is based in Rome, Italy and focuses on Technology and Solutions for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

May 16, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Naida Jahic https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Naida Jahic2026-05-16 07:30:312026-05-16 10:15:31Rural Poverty in Kazakhstan and Efforts to Bridge the Gap
Development, Education, Global Poverty

School Readiness: Early Childhood Education in Ghana

Education in GhanaInvesting in early childhood education is one of the most effective ways to support long-term development. Research shows that experiences during the early years play a critical role in shaping how children learn, communicate and interact with others, influencing their future health, behavior and economic opportunities. In early learning settings, young children begin to develop basic literacy and numeracy skills while also learning how to engage with peers and participate in structured environments. 

These foundational experiences help children transition more successfully into elementary school. However, access remains unequal, particularly in low-income contexts, where many children miss out on early learning opportunities. Expanding early childhood education in Ghana reflects a broader effort to ensure that more children benefit from a strong start.

Expanding Access Through Free Kindergarten

A central feature of early childhood education in Ghana is the integration of two years of free and compulsory kindergarten into the national basic education system. This policy ensures that children ages 4 to 5 have access to structured early learning before entering primary school, helping them develop foundational skills in literacy, numeracy and social interaction. By making kindergarten part of compulsory education, Ghana recognizes early learning as an essential stage rather than an optional step, strengthening school readiness nationwide.

Recent national efforts continue to build on this foundation by improving coordination across sectors and expanding inclusive services that support young children’s development and well-being.

Ongoing Challenges in Early Childhood Education

Despite strong national policies, early childhood education in Ghana continues to face several challenges that affect both access and quality. Shortages of trained kindergarten teachers remain a concern, along with limited teaching and learning materials in many classrooms. In some areas, infrastructure is inadequate to support young learners and classrooms can be overcrowded. 

There are also gaps in coordination between institutions and limited data at local levels, making it harder to plan effectively. In addition, family and community engagement is not always consistent and children in rural or underserved areas are less likely to benefit fully from early learning opportunities.

Strengthening Quality Through Teacher Support

Improving the quality of early childhood education in Ghana has become a key priority alongside expanding access. National and international partners support teacher training initiatives to improve classroom practices and learning outcomes. For example, Sabre Education works with kindergarten teachers in Ghana to provide training and ongoing support in delivering the national curriculum through structured, play-based learning.

This approach helps teachers use guided activities and classroom materials to support early literacy and numeracy development. These efforts show how targeted teacher support can strengthen daily learning experiences and improve school readiness.

Building a Strong Foundation for the Future

The progress of early childhood development in Ghana shows how sustained policy commitment and targeted support can improve school readiness and long-term outcomes. By making kindergarten free and compulsory and investing in teacher training and system coordination, Ghana is strengthening the foundation of its education system. While challenges remain, continued efforts to expand access and improve quality can help ensure that more children enter elementary school prepared to learn and succeed.

– Isil Ertas Senturk

Isil is based in Oakville, Ontario, Canada and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

May 15, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Lynsey 2 https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Lynsey 22026-05-15 01:30:142026-05-15 13:12:21School Readiness: Early Childhood Education in Ghana
Agriculture, Development, Global Poverty

The Strengths and Limitations of Coconut Farming in Indonesia

Coconut Farming in IndonesiaWhile Indonesia is the world’s top exporter of coconuts, generating more than $1 billion annually, according to upper-middle-income definitions, roughly 68% of Indonesians live in poverty. Although Indonesia and the Philippines accounted for about 67% of crude coconut oil export, coconut farming in Indonesia highlights both the strengths and limits of agriculture in reducing poverty.

The Strengths of the Indonesian Coconut Industry

Roughly 6.6 million Indonesian farmers rely on the coconut industry as their main source of income. In a country where infrastructure development is severely constrained by its island chain geography, coconut farming in Indonesia is a lifeline for the eastern region in particular. In this region, communities are spread across thousands of scattered islands.

Due to geographic isolation and limited infrastructure, 80% of livelihoods in certain areas of Eastern Indonesia rely on subsistence farming. Coconut farming in Indonesia remains accessible to rural communities, as the country’s climate supports year-round growth. Additionally, coconut crops require less fertilizer than many other crops, allowing lower-income households to cultivate small plots and harvest multiple times throughout the year.

This sector not only supports farming households but also entire rural communities. Beyond smallholder farmers, the industry sustains a wide network of livelihoods, including transport workers, market sellers and processing workers, all of whom rely on coconut production for income. As global demand for healthy alternatives and plant-based options surges, the Indonesian coconut industry is projected to grow at a faster rate in the coming years. 

This growth could create new opportunities for exports, value-added production and increased income potential for smallholder farmers in Indonesia.

The Limits of the Coconut Industry

Despite its scale, coconut farming in Indonesia faces limitations that prevent many farmers from earning higher incomes. One of the most significant issues is low productivity. Coconut yields in Indonesia average around 1.1 tons per hectare, although higher-performing varieties can yield more than 2.8 tons per hectare. This is due to the use of older trees, less efficient farming methods and the continued use of lower-yield crops. 

Additionally, pests, disease and land conversion make it difficult for farmers to maintain strong production, ultimately reducing their potential income. Replanting efforts also remain limited, as new coconut trees can take six to 10 years to reach full productivity. This makes it difficult for smallholder farmers to replace aging crops without facing short-term income losses. 

As a result, many farmers continue relying on older trees with declining yields, reinforcing cycles of low productivity and low income. When coconut farming in Indonesia is stable, farmers often remain at the lowest level of the value chain. Most smallholders sell raw coconuts or copra rather than value-added products such as coconut oil or packaged goods. 

Low Returns

A significant portion of profits is captured later in the supply chain by processors and exporters. This leaves farmers with relatively low returns. In Indonesia’s eastern archipelago, communities are spread across remote, dispersed islands. This geography limits infrastructure development, making it difficult to transport goods. Farmers in these areas often face higher transportation costs and reduced access to larger markets, forcing them to sell locally at lower prices.

Coconut farming in Indonesia is also vulnerable to price fluctuations in global markets. Coconut prices are influenced by broader vegetable oil markets, including competition with palm oil, which is often cheaper and more widely used. As the world’s largest producer of palm oil, Indonesia has historically directed more investment and policy support toward that sector, leaving coconut farming comparatively underdeveloped.

Strengthening Indonesia’s Coconut Sector

While coconut farming continues to support millions of livelihoods, these structural challenges highlight its limits. For many rural communities, the industry provides stability and income, but often at a level that sustains households rather than significantly improving long-term economic mobility. However, efforts to strengthen Indonesia’s coconut sector are already underway.

Government programs and international organizations are focusing on replanting aging trees, improving farming techniques and expanding access to value-added production. These initiatives aim to help farmers move beyond raw coconut sales and capture a larger share of the industry’s profits. At the same time, investments in rural infrastructure and market access could make it easier for farmers in eastern regions to connect with larger supply chains.

While coconut farming in Indonesia alone may not be enough to lift communities out of poverty, targeted support and modernization efforts show that the industry still holds significant potential to improve livelihoods across the country.

– Kale Overton

Kale is based in Ames, Iowa, USA and focuses on Good News and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

May 6, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Lynsey 2 https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Lynsey 22026-05-06 10:45:282026-05-06 10:45:28The Strengths and Limitations of Coconut Farming in Indonesia
Development, Economy, Global Poverty

Africa’s Investment in 2026: The Continent’s Economic Rise

Africa's Investment in 2026Amid declining foreign aid and shifting global alliances, Africa’s investment in 2026 is telling a new story. Recent reporting by The Economist highlights a shift in Africa’s economic trajectory, as the continent demonstrates resilience despite declining foreign aid and changing global financial conditions.

For decades, global narratives have often framed Africa as a recipient of aid, a perception shaped by economic crises, humanitarian emergencies and international development campaigns. However, in recent years, a shift has begun. According to projections from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sub-Saharan Africa is expected to outpace Asia in economic growth in 2026 for the first time. Six out of the 10 fastest-growing economies of 2026 are African countries. This growth signals a broader transition from aid dependency to investment-driven development.

Africa’s Investment in 2026

Africa is now receiving less in aid than it is in remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI). More countries are participating in African investment in 2026 than at any previous point. FDI in Africa rose sharply in 2024, increasing by 75% to $97 billion and raising the continent’s share of global FDI from 4% to 6%.

Europe, the United States and China remain the lead investors in Africa. However, in 2025, a broader range of countries began to increase their presence on the continent. Japan and India are committed to a partnership focused on investing in African mineral resources. An Emirati conglomerate, International Resources Holding, acquired a controlling stake in a tin mine in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, following a similar investment in a Zambian copper mine in 2024. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) purchased a majority stake in Olam Agri, a Singaporean agribusiness firm with a significant presence in Africa.

Gulf-based companies such as DP World are also expanding port infrastructure across the continent, while firms like France’s TotalEnergies continue to invest in large-scale energy projects in Mozambique. Global technology companies, including Microsoft and Google, are increasing investments in digital infrastructure, reflecting growing interest in Africa’s emerging tech markets. Venture capital is also expanding, with initiatives such as Norrsken22, a $200 million tech investment fund focused on African startups, supporting innovation and entrepreneurship.

An Opportunity to Become a Global Player

Although recent global challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing conflicts, have exposed Africa’s reliance on imports and structural weaknesses, they have also created opportunities for the continent. More countries, particularly in Europe, are turning toward Africa for resources such as critical minerals and oil, as well as for opportunities to invest in infrastructure projects. This growing external interest is one of the key drivers behind the surge in Africa investment in 2026.

Africans are also increasingly investing in Africa. Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote has focused on finding opportunities across the continent. Dangote Cement is Africa’s largest cement producer, with operations from Ethiopia to Senegal to South Africa. Dangote Refinery and Petrochemicals operates an oil processing facility with a capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, designed to supply fuel to West, Central and East Africa. The Dangote Group recently announced a minimum $1 billion investment in a pipeline, power generation and cement plant in Zimbabwe. Ranked by Forbes as Africa’s wealthiest individual, Dangote has demonstrated the value of investing in the home continent.

African Governance and Sovereignty

African countries are building more robust economic systems. In 2025, South Africa, Ghana, Uganda and Rwanda, among others, made changes diverting more funds toward private equity and venture capital.

With encouragement from the African Union (AU), countries have also begun increasing exchanges with one another, whether through trade, cash flows or movement of people. African governments are becoming more integrated rather than relying solely on partnerships with Europe, the U.S. and China.

This assertion of agency extends beyond economics. Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have removed French as their official language, reflecting broader efforts to assert political and economic sovereignty and redefine relationships with former colonial powers.

Looking Ahead

The continent continues to face significant challenges, including extreme poverty, ongoing conflicts and a historical dependence on foreign powers. However, the trajectory of Africa’s investment in 2026 points in a new direction. Africa’s tech sector continues to expand, with startups attracting increasing investment and driving innovation in finance, logistics and digital services. African countries are also diversifying their global partnerships, attracting investment from the Middle East, Asia and private sector actors beyond traditional Western donors. These developments signal a broader transition toward investment, self-sufficiency and long-term economic growth.

As stated by South African business executive, Euvin Naidoo: “You can make money, you can lose money in Africa. But opportunities, boy oh boy, they exist.” Africa investments in 2026 reflect that growing confidence.

– Chloe Bonnefil

Chloe is based in Miami, FL, USA and focuses on Business and New Markets for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

May 5, 2026
https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg 0 0 Precious Sheidu https://borgenproject.org/wp-content/uploads/borgen-project-logo.svg Precious Sheidu2026-05-05 10:51:292026-05-05 10:51:29Africa’s Investment in 2026: The Continent’s Economic Rise
Page 1 of 163123›»

Get Smarter

  • Global Poverty 101
  • Global Poverty… The Good News
  • Global Poverty & U.S. Jobs
  • Global Poverty and National Security
  • Innovative Solutions to Poverty
  • Global Poverty & Aid FAQ’s
Search Search

Take Action

  • Call Congress
  • Email Congress
  • Donate
  • 30 Ways to Help
  • Volunteer Ops
  • Internships
  • Courses & Certificates
  • The Podcast
Borgen Project

“The Borgen Project is an incredible nonprofit organization that is addressing poverty and hunger and working towards ending them.”

-The Huffington Post

Inside The Borgen Project

  • Contact
  • About
  • Financials
  • President
  • Board of Directors
  • Board of Advisors

International Links

  • UK Email Parliament
  • UK Donate
  • Canada Email Parliament

Get Smarter

  • Global Poverty 101
  • Global Poverty… The Good News
  • Global Poverty & U.S. Jobs
  • Global Poverty and National Security
  • Innovative Solutions to Poverty
  • Global Poverty & Aid FAQ’s

Ways to Help

  • Call Congress
  • Email Congress
  • Donate
  • 30 Ways to Help
  • Volunteer Ops
  • Internships
  • Courses & Certificates
  • The Podcast
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top