Tag Archive for: Inequality

Posts

, ,

Commitment to SDG10: Reducing Inequality in South Africa

Reducing Inequality in South AfricaRace remains the largest driver of inequality in South Africa, shaped by a legacy that has remained largely unchanged. The effects of apartheid continue to undermine progress toward equality. For decades, the World Bank has ranked South Africa as the most unequal country in the world.

This inequality continues to limit social mobility, reinforcing a cycle of wealth and poverty. Many individuals are effectively assigned a future of either “rags or riches” at birth. While Sustainable Development Goal 10 aims to reduce inequality, high income and opportunity gaps persist due to long-standing structural injustices.

Inequality in South Africa can largely be traced to three key factors: pre-income distribution, unequal access to education and wage disparities.

Pre-Income Distribution

Pre-income distribution refers to factors that influence wealth and opportunity before income is earned. These include land ownership, inheritance and race, all of which are “born into” factors that cannot be changed, giving individuals a natural advantage or disadvantage from birth.

In South Africa, the Gini coefficient remains at 0.63, with the top 20% of the population accounting for nearly 70% of income. In comparison, the bottom 20% is left with less than 5%. Race remains the most dominant determining factor in pre-income distribution. Fifty years after apartheid, its impact is still evident, leaving lasting reminders of the grip it once had on the country.

Some progress has been made toward transparency in income inequality. Recent Companies Act amendments now require firms to disclose CEO-to-worker pay ratios. The Labor Research Service reports that the current average across the JSE Top 40 companies is approximately 1,270:1. This aspect of inequality has been addressed most effectively through social grants.

With one of the largest social grant systems in the world, South Africa has reached millions of vulnerable citizens. These grants have been widely commended. By 2011, the number of grant recipients had increased by 13.6 million since 1998. Although the Gini coefficient still indicates significant inequality, social grants have helped stabilize the incomes of some of the country’s most impoverished households, preventing inequality levels from rising even further.

Wage Inequality

Even after overcoming barriers to employment, many South Africans continue to face inequality. On average, women in South Africa earn 12% less than their male counterparts. Almost half of this gap (45%) is attributed to women’s disproportionate employment in lower-paying firms.

Structural unemployment is another significant contributor to wage inequality. With the economy in a state of stagnation, the job market is suffering. With jobs themselves hard to come by and few in number, this is a significant driver of inequality.

In recent years, youth unemployment has risen to more than 46%, contributing to poverty and reinforcing the country’s slow economic growth. This has created another major barrier to reducing inequality in South Africa.

Access to Education

Schools in South Africa face significant resource constraints, resulting in wide gaps in students’ fundamental skills. This was highlighted in 2021, when it was found that approximately 80% of Grade 4 learners could not read for meaning, unable to comprehend or extract information from text. This outcome stems from a broader lack of resources.

Infrastructure and qualified teachers remain in short supply, particularly in poorer, rural communities. Still grappling with the consequences of its past, spatial inequality continues to limit access to education. “The legacy of colonialism and apartheid, rooted in racial and spatial segregation, continues to reinforce inequality,” United Nations Human Rights Office.

Spatial inequality was influenced greatly by the Group Areas Act of 1950. The initiative removed black families from urban areas, relocating them to underdeveloped, rural towns. As families were forced to settle in these new designated areas, generations later, spatial segregation persisted.

Lacking infrastructure, these areas were burdened with numerous encumbrances, allowing families living there to fall behind their thriving suburban peers. This stark contrast remains, most notably in the suburbs and townships of Johannesburg.

Conclusion

Pervasive structural injustices left over from apartheid still linger, despite staggering progress in reducing inequality in South Africa. The nation has nonetheless made impressive strides toward achieving SDG 10. These include social grants and legislative amendments that demand transparency on wage disparities, thereby perpetuating pressure and accountability.

– Maya Hollick

Maya Hollick is based in the United Kingdom and focuses on Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

All About Higher Education in Chile

Higher Education in ChileAttaining higher education in Chile is associated with a myriad of positive outcomes, including employment opportunities, higher compensation and even improved health. Individuals with higher education have a lower risk of unemployment and generally earn higher wages. The unemployment rate for those with higher education is 5.5% compared to 8.1% for those with upper secondary education.

Workers with higher education earn 112% more than the average income in Chile. Education level is a widely recognized social determinant of health and the completion of higher education is associated with more positive health outcomes.

Inequality in Higher Educational Attainment

In Chile, disparities in tertiary education attainment are closely linked to social factors, including parental education, socioeconomic status and gender. Children of parents who have completed tertiary education are more likely to pursue higher education than those whose parents have not. In 2023, 68% of adults aged 25-34 with at least one parent who had completed tertiary education also attained tertiary education, compared to 25% for adults whose parents did not complete tertiary education.

However, the rate of young adults pursuing tertiary education whose parents did not complete tertiary education increased by 7% between 2012 and 2023. Higher family socioeconomic status is also associated with an increased likelihood of completing higher education. In 2006, 12.7% of adults aged 25-34 from the lowest income decile enrolled in tertiary education, compared to 53.3% of the top income decile.

Furthermore, women enrolled in tertiary education are less likely to pursue a degree in STEM and other high-earning fields of study. In 2023, only 19.8% of students pursuing degrees in a STEM field were female.

A Largely Privatized System

Chile’s higher education system consists of three main types: universities, professional institutes (Instituto Profesional – IP) and technical training centers (Centro de Formación Técnica – CFT). While overall enrollment in tertiary education has continued to rise, the majority of growth since 2010 has occurred in private institutions. As a result, Chile has one of the most privatized higher education systems in the world.

In 2023, fewer than 20% of students enrolled in a tertiary education institution attended a public institution. Hence, Chilean families pay more than 75% of costs for higher education, compared to 40% for U.S. families and 5% in Scandinavian countries.

Gratuidad

A notable wave of protests demanding more affordable, high-quality higher education in Chile occurred in 2011. In 2016, the Chilean congress passed a tuition-free policy known as gratuidad to provide free university education for families in the bottom 60% of the income range. A lack of studies on the impact and effectiveness of gratuidad makes its success in creating a more equitable tertiary education system unclear.

The reform’s implementation has initiated slow progress toward expanding access to financial aid for low-income students, as approximately 90% of students who qualify have already received financial aid before the reform. However, the idea of free education likely incentivizes people from low-income families to pursue higher education, as 15% of students in the gratuidad program claim they would not have pursued higher education otherwise.

Conclusion

Attaining a higher education in Chile reduces the likelihood of living in poverty. Creating a more equitable and inclusive education system is key to reducing the 6.5% of Chile’s population living below the national poverty line. Expanding access to tertiary education for individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and those whose parents lack tertiary education, as well as increasing the representation of women in STEM fields, are key focal points for reducing poverty.

– Sarah Merrill

Sarah is based in Matthews, NC, USA and focuses on Good News and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pixabay

, ,

Inequality in Isan: Building Economic and Social Equity

Inequality in IsanLocated in northeastern Thailand, Isan is the country’s largest and most populous region, home to roughly 22 million people. Despite national declines in poverty, research from The Asia Foundation in 2019, based on surveys and in-depth interviews with 1,400 residents, shows that Isan continues to face the highest poverty rate and the lowest average income in Thailand. In 2018, the average monthly income in the central region reached 12,818 baht (about $407), nearly double the 6,790 baht ($216) reported in the Isan region.

The study also found that although 87% of households in Isan own land, land ownership alone has not guaranteed stable or sufficient livelihoods.

Budget and Health Care Inequality and Intra-Regional Disparity

Inequality persists in Thailand, particularly in the Isan region, when compared to more affluent areas such as Bangkok. In 2024, the Thai government allocated only 5.54% of its 3.48-trillion-baht (roughly $111 billion) national budget to Isan. In contrast, it allocated almost 10 times that amount, 1.85 trillion baht ($59.2 billion), to Bangkok, despite the capital having less than half of Isan’s population (around 11 million people).

Health care distribution also reflects this inequality. In 2023, Thailand had 37,559 doctors nationwide, but only 8,447 worked in Isan. Inequalities also exist within the region itself. Khon Kaen, one of Isan’s major cities, has a significantly lower doctor-to-patient ratio, with one doctor serving approximately 1,080 people, compared to Bueng Kan, where one doctor serves 5,003 people.

Discrimination

According to Manushya, urban populations in wealthier regions have long perpetuated negative stereotypes about Isan people, mocking them as poor, backward or as “mia farang” (meaning a white foreigner’s wife). The Asia Foundation also notes that some believe “there is no future in Isan,” leading to the assumption that people must migrate to Bangkok for “good prospects.” However, the study shows major shifts in migration patterns.

Young people in Isan are increasingly choosing to enroll in local institutions, such as Khon Kaen University, rather than moving to Bangkok. As a result, students are becoming more interested in pursuing entrepreneurship in Isan rather than seeking work in the capital. These findings show that the negative stereotypes stem from outdated or poorly informed assumptions.

Universal Health Coverage

Thailand introduced the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Scheme, often referred to as the “30-baht Scheme,” in 2001 to provide health care access for residents not covered by other public health schemes. The Asia Foundation identifies UHC as the most widely used social safety net in Isan, with 97% of surveyed respondents expressing high satisfaction. Before the scheme began, around 80% of the population lacked adequate health care coverage or faced prohibitive medical costs.

UHC has reduced this burden significantly. By 2015, household health care expenditure in Thailand had decreased by 11.8%, easing financial pressure on low-income households and contributing to a reduction in poverty.

Manushya and Advocacy Efforts

Founded in 2017 by Emilie Palamy Paradichit, Manushya is an intersectional feminist organization dedicated to promoting equality and human rights. Manushya worked with several Thai civil society organizations to prepare the Isan UPR factsheet for Thailand’s third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2021. These partners included the Thai CSOs Coalition for the UPR, the Human Rights Violations in Isaan Monitoring Group, the Sai Thong Rak Pah Network, the Amnat Charoen Friend of Women Center and the Isaan Gender Diversity Network (IGDN).

The factsheet highlighted discrimination against Isan residents, such as unequal budget allocation, employment in low-paying jobs and negative stereotypes describing people as “poor,” “backward,” or “lower-class.” Manushya also included these concerns in its shadow civil society report for Thailand’s Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) review and participated in two sessions with CERD committee members to ensure that issues affecting Isan were addressed.

Progress and Opportunities in Isan

Efforts to reduce inequality in Isan demonstrate how targeted policies and strong community engagement can lead to meaningful change. Programs such as the UHC have expanded access to essential services, while organizations like Manushya continue to advocate for fair resource distribution and human rights protections. Growing interest in local education and entrepreneurship also reflects a generation investing in the region’s future.

With continued cooperation among government agencies, civil society groups and local communities, progress toward addressing inequality in Isan can accelerate, supporting more secure and sustainable livelihoods.

– Sammi Li

Sammi is based in London, UK and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pexels

,

ONE Campaign: Tackling Inequality in Africa

Tackling Inequality in AfricaAfrica is the most impoverished continent in the world, with economic insecurity, political instability and disease worsening the hardships and exacerbating the inequality faced by its population. However, while these economic and social challenges can paint a bleak picture, many organizations and campaigns are dedicated to tackling inequality in Africa. For example, the organization ONE is dedicated to improving the lives of those living in the region using a combination of resources to drive policies that create essential and lasting change.

ONE

ONE is a global, strictly nonpartisan organization that uses activism, expert data and analysis and public campaigning to pressure lawmakers to support essential policies for Africa. Bono, lead singer of U2, co-founded ONE and its sister organization RED in 2004. Since then, ONE has secured $1 trillion in investments and taken 25 million actions to create more economic opportunities and improve the lives and health of those living in Africa.

ONE’s recent work focused on the reauthorisation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act and the Development Finance Corporation.

Economic Insecurity

Africa is the second-fastest-growing region in the world in 2025, with the African Development Bank predicting a 4.3% growth rate in the economy. However, there are still 464 million people living in poverty on the continent. Furthermore, there has been a slight decrease in the number of people living in extreme poverty (less than $3 a day) in the last few years in some regions.

For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, 46% of the population faced extreme poverty last year, a slight decrease from 46.4% in 2022. However, these persistently high rates can be partly attributed to widespread economic insecurity. According to the U.N. Trade and Development, the “high debt, trade imbalances and inflation” experienced by some countries in Africa lead to more vulnerable economies and, therefore, higher poverty rates.

Economic insecurity is, of course, an extremely concerning and pressing issue and has been exacerbated by the recent reduction in foreign aid. A spokesperson from ONE states that “U.S. foreign aid cuts have been devastating to the African continent.” They explain that “when donor countries step back, domestic governments pay more to borrow, forcing painful trade-offs in national budgets.”

This ultimately results in reduced workforce capacity, slower economic growth and continued inequality. However, the ONE Campaign is tackling inequality in Africa by supporting “economic development policies that empower partnership, trade, power access and entrepreneurship between Africa and the global economy.” These efforts offer hope for a more economically stable future for the continent.

Health

Health care infrastructure across Africa often fails to meet population needs because of chronic underfunding. High disease rates place even greater strain on these systems, causing the most vulnerable to suffer disproportionately, deepening poverty and slowing economic growth as the workforce weakens. While many diseases remain pressing issues in Africa, the rising rates of HIV/AIDS are among the most alarming.

According to UNAIDS, 5.2 million people in Central and Western Africa and 240,000 people in the Middle East and North Africa were living with HIV in 2024. ONE’s spokesperson says the recent foreign aid cuts have placed additional strain on Africa’s health care systems, particularly amid the resurgence of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. According to them, the cuts have led to reduced disease testing and tracing, long delays in accessing medications and support and limited communication to rural and other vulnerable communities.

They also report a rise in babies born with HIV and an increase in HIV-related deaths. However, according to ONE, while Africa urgently needs stronger health care infrastructure, hope lies in the continent’s growing innovation. One major breakthrough, according to ONE’s spokesperson, is a game-changing HIV drug, lenacapavir, which has shown nearly 100% effectiveness in preventing transmission.

They add that with sustained global investment, this drug has the potential to help end the epidemic. To continue tackling inequality in Africa, it is clear that while the continent is not short on health innovations, it urgently needs consistent funding to sustain progress and improve lives.

The Future

Speaking regarding the future, ONE’s spokesperson states, “Africa is an incredibly diverse continent. Every country and every region within each country faces its own unique challenges, which must be addressed through political, cultural and socially relevant lenses,” rather than grouping all countries under a single “challenge set.” ONE is working to move perception away from a generalist view and challenge “prevailing negative stereotypes…that suggest Africa is ‘bad for investment,'” instead highlighting the promise and opportunities that investment in Africa can bring.

By supporting organizations like ONE in addressing inequality, there is hope for stronger public health systems, greater economic opportunities and reduced poverty across the continent.

– Victoria Adrados

Victoria is based in London, UK and focuses on Good News and Technology for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Gender Wage Gap in Montenegro

Gender Wage Gap in MontenegroMontenegro has made steady progress on gender equality, however, women continue to earn less than men across most sectors of the economy. Structural habits in employment, social expectations and inequalities within the labor market reflect the gender wage gap in Montenegro, resulting in higher poverty risks for women.

A 2021 report from the International Labor Organization (ILO) indicates a 21.6% difference between female and male average earnings. Prime-age workers, highly skilled workers and foreign employees experience the most significant gap. Differences in the wage gap are not due to lack of qualifications or experience, but structural inequalities that shape the outcomes of women’s earnings.

Sectoral Segregation Reinforces Inequality

One of the leading factors of the gender wage gap in Montenegro is occupational segregation, as most women work in lower-paying sectors. Men dominate higher-paid fields, including construction, technology and energy, while women are concentrated in fields including retail, education and health care. Many women are on fixed-term contracts, facing larger wage penalties and limiting long-term earning potential. These disparities increase women’s vulnerability to poverty.

Female workers in Montenegro often acquire higher levels of education compared to men. However, these improved qualifications are not yet reflected in their pay. According to the LIO, highly educated women continue to earn less than similarly educated men. This suggests that gendered stereotypes, limited access to leadership roles and hiring patterns continue to hold back guaranteed equal pay and reinforce the gender wage gap in Montenegro.

Women Face Higher Poverty Risk Amid Unequal Earnings 

Montenegro’s Gender Equality Index score for 2023 was 59.3, placing the nation below the European Union average by more than nine points. According to the Statistical Office of Montenegro (MONSTAT), monetary and economic resources remain the least equal category. Scarce access to economic opportunities alongside lower earnings positions Montenegrin women at a higher risk of poverty than men, especially single mothers and rural women.

Reforms Aim To Reduce the Wage Gap

The Montenegrin government has introduced several legal and policy reforms to strengthen equal-pay protections and expand economic opportunities for women. Reforms include improving labor-law enforcement, expanding digital-skills training and supporting female entrepreneurship. The European Union and international partners are supporting these programs. According to the UNDP, these initiatives increased women’s participation in training programs supporting more than 500 women-led businesses between 2020 and 2023. Strengthening these reforms is vital to closing the gender wage gap in Montenegro.

Ending the gender wage gap in Montenegro will require a sustained investment in childcare, stronger enforcement of equal-pay law and expanded opportunities for women in high-growth industries. With consistent support from national institutions, the European Union and local organizations, Montenegro can reduce poverty rates and build a more equitable and resilient economy for all. 

– Hana Abulkheir

Hana is based in London, UK and focuses on Global Health and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

, ,

Tackling Indigenous Poverty in Guatemala

Indigenous Poverty in GuatemalaGuatemala, a small country in Central America with a population of 18.4 million, continues to face widespread poverty, especially among Indigenous communities. 

Brief History of Indigenous People in Guatemala

The Maya people, Guatemala’s largest Indigenous group, have endured centuries worth of colonization, conquest and neocolonial forms of violence and domination. Their struggles and systemic discrimination increased during the Guatemalan Civil War that lasted from 1960 to 1996. During the civil war, the Maya people were accused of being affiliated with or supporters of the Guerrillas (a paramilitary group).

The Guatemalan government burned entire villages and innocent people were massacred. What is now considered a genocide resulted in more than 200,000 deaths, the internal displacement of one million people and 30,000 fleeing as refugees to other countries. The Peace Accords were signed in 1996, allowing most refugees to return home to Guatemala.

The next crucial step was the signing of the Accord on Identity and Rights for Indigenous Peoples, designed to protect Guatemala’s Indigenous communities. Unfortunately, it wasn’t implemented.

The Numbers

Indigenous poverty in Guatemala stems from long-standing inequality—Indigenous people do not receive the same opportunities or respect as non-Indigenous populations. Indeed, four out of five Indigenous Guatemalans live in poverty, with limited access to healthcare, education and other basic necessities. Around 75% of Guatemala’s Indigenous population lives in rural areas, where government support is often limited.

Approximately 58% of Indigenous people suffer from chronic malnutrition (compared to 38% of the non-Indigenous population), which stunts children’s growth and learning, perpetuating the cycle of poverty. Additionally, many Indigenous children do not complete secondary school and literacy rates remain particularly low among Indigenous women.

Why These Inequalities Persist

These disparities are rooted in structural and institutional discrimination:

  • Structural Racism: According to The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA), the social and political gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Guatemalans reflects systemic racism, a legacy of colonialism that remains interwoven into modern governance.
  • Unequal Public Investment: The stark difference in daily per-capita spending ($0.40 vs. $0.90) highlights how Indigenous lives are under-resourced by the state.
  • Land Dispossession: Many Indigenous communities lack formal land titles. Without recognized land rights, they remain vulnerable to eviction, exploitation and external development projects.
  • Geographical Isolation: With most Indigenous people living in rural areas, many communities are physically and economically remote, making access to services extremely difficult.

The Change

Despite the debilitating history and hardships, Indigenous and campesino (peasant farmer) movements and organizations have taken the lead in improving the livelihood of Indigenous people in Guatemala. For more than 36 years, the Campesino Committee of the Highlands (CCDA) has fought for access to land, the defense of territory, decent work and justice. Founded in 1981, after the signing of the Peace Accords, it expanded to the Alta Verapaz region.

Currently, CCDA works in 20 departments around Guatemala. Regarding the chronic malnutrition affecting more than half of the Indigenous population, the Crecer Sano Project addresses malnutrition from a sectoral perspective. This organization focuses on expanding access to basic healthcare in remote areas, improving water access and improving sanitation.

More than 31,000 families have received water filters through this program. The initiative emphasizes behavior change by integrating traditional practices, ensuring that these communities receive culturally appropriate care. Guatemala is also vulnerable to natural disasters, which include hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes.

These natural occurrences disproportionately affect the most impoverished communities. International initiatives have supported Indigenous-led development as well. For instance, the Dedicated Grant Mechanism (DGM) for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities is part of Guatemala’s Forest Investment Program, which seeks to reduce deforestation and promote sustainable forest management. The DGM strengthens Indigenous communities’ capacity to manage land and forests sustainably by combining traditional knowledge with economic opportunities that incentivize environmental stewardship.

Moving Forward

Progress has been slow. However, organizations such as CCDA, the Crecer Sano Project and DGM demonstrate that addressing Indigenous poverty in Guatemala through empowerment and environmental protection can be achieved in tandem. Achieving true equality will require continued investment, respect for Indigenous land rights and a national commitment to justice and inclusion.

Guatemala’s Indigenous poverty is not just a legacy of the past; it is a current, structural problem. High rates of malnutrition, poverty and exclusion reflect centuries of marginalization. But the story is not only one of suffering: Indigenous communities, supported by international partners, are leading initiatives for healthier, more just futures via projects like Crecer Sano and rural development partnerships.

To build a more equitable Guatemala, it will take sustained political will, fair resource distribution, secured land rights and respect for Indigenous leadership. Only then can Guatemala truly fulfill its constitutional commitment to being a multicultural nation.

– Arielle Telfort

Arielle is based in Purchase, NY, USA and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Addressing Disability and Poverty in Eswatini

Disability and Poverty in EswatiniGeographically diverse yet almost entirely surrounded by South Africa, Eswatini is considered one of the smallest countries in Africa, spanning only 200 km north to south and 130 km east to west. Disability and poverty in Eswatini remain deeply interconnected, reinforcing cycles of inequality and restricting opportunities for growth. Far from being isolated conditions, they are overlapping challenges that shape much of the nation’s social reality.

About Disability and Poverty in Eswatini

With a population of 1.3 million, life expectancy reaches low at 58 years in comparison to the US where the average life expectancy is 78.6 years according to the National Library of Medicine. It is no coincidence that Eswatini’s average life expectancy is low. With some improvement, poverty rates still remain extremely high for the country with almost 60% of the population living below the poverty line and a Gini coefficient for inequality of 0.54 reflecting a weak economic environment, according to The Word Bank of Eswatini. 

The Gini coefficient for inequality is a statistical measure that quantifies inequality on a scale from 0 to 1 with 0 being perfect equality and 1 being the complete opposite, major inequality. Eswatini’s score of 0.54 indicates that there is a quite high rate of inequality for the country’s population. 

Although inequality is in regard to pay, gender and age, the issue of disability and poverty in Eswatini remains significant. Disability and poverty have close links in the country. High numbers of people with disabilities report having significant financial difficulties in accessing essential services such as health care.

Population Trends

According to the government of Estwatini, with the estimated population of 1.1 million people, the average growth rate increased by about 0.86% annually over the last 11 year period leading to 2021 (2010-2021).

Within that timeline, the 2017 Population and Housing Census revealed that approximately 13% of the population (more than 140,000) were individuals with disabilities that found it challenging to perform daily functions. Most common of these disabilities was related to either vision (32.6%) and mobility (26.5%), with females being significantly more affected than males across all disabilities.

Other than mobility and vision being the most common disability among citizens of Eswatini, other disabilities such albinism (0.7%) and epilepsy (0.6%) also occur. In rural areas, disability is more common with more than 80% of individuals residing in these areas facing mobility issues and vision difficulties.

Poverty’s Role in Disability and Inequality

According to a report by UNICEF, individuals with disabilities in the country are significantly more likely to live in poverty. With low opportunities and access to health services, jobs and education, many individuals in rural areas rely on cash assistance and support services to mitigate poverty’s impact.

Although poverty has been decreasing long term, Eswatini still faces high levels of inequality for disabled individuals. Approximately 52% of citizens with disabilities have no access to education and only 28% of them have employment.

Vision for the Future

The government of Eswatini has recognized the need to address the rising issue. Being put into action between 2024-28, the Eswatini National Disability Plan of Action aims to promote protection of rights of disabled individuals and “to ensure that national policies and development programmes mainstream disability rights in all stages of planning, implementation, monitoring, and reporting.”

Some goals of this new act include:

  • Increase enrollment of individuals with disabilities in schools by 100%.
  • Provide free and affordable healthcare to all people with disabilities in the country.
  • Increase national and international advocacy about these challenges.
  • Increase involvement in sports and activity by 30% for people with disabilities

While issues may still be prominent, there is hope of changes in the future with the government of Eswatini actively engaging in addressing disability and poverty in Eswatini.

– Zosia Paciorek

Zosia is based in St. Louis, MO, USA and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

,

Being Poor in Portugal: Ending the Cycle for Future Generations

Being Poor in PortugalPortugal, located in southwestern Europe, borders Spain to the north and east and stretches along nearly 1,800 kilometers of Atlantic coastline to the west. The capital of Lisbon was once a symbol of prosperity and influence among European nations, but being poor in Portugal was not uncommon for children and other disadvantaged groups. Today, Portugal is home to roughly 1.7 million children, many of whom still live below the poverty line.

A Society of Inequality

Many nations viewed Portugal as the world’s most powerful empire, despite its small size. During the 15th and 16th centuries, Portuguese explorers established routes to major regions, including India, Brazil and China. Yet, the prosperity concentrated in urban centers stood in sharp contrast to the poverty in rural areas.

By the mid-18th century, several major events weakened Portugal’s position on the world stage. The 1755 Lisbon earthquake devastated the capital and Napoleon’s invasion in 1807 further destabilized the country. With limited financial resources, Portugal struggled to keep pace with industrialization. Political instability, inadequate infrastructure and a fragile economy deepened poverty across the nation. Children were among the most vulnerable, facing restricted access to both health care and education.

In the early 2000s, major cities such as Lisbon experienced modest economic growth, driven by tourism and foreign investment. Yet being poor in Portugal remained a reality for many children, as poverty continued to affect a significant portion of the population.

Addressing the Challenge

Nations around the world often praise Europe for its education and health care systems, yet childhood poverty remains a pressing issue in Portugal. In 2021, UNICEF reported that nearly one in five Portuguese children were living in poverty, highlighting the work still needed to ensure equal opportunities for all.

Efforts to combat childhood poverty in Portugal are gaining momentum through advocacy and government programs. In 2023, the country launched the Child Guarantee National Action Plan, a major EU initiative aimed at improving children’s lives. The plan focuses on expanding access to health care, increasing educational opportunities, providing nutritious meals and ensuring adequate housing for those in need. Philanthropists and organizations like AMI are also driving meaningful change.

From the Pitch to the People: Soccer Star Gives Back

Cristiano Ronaldo, a native of Portugal, is one of the world’s most famous footballers. Fans will never forget his soccer achievements, and his advocacy continues to make a difference off the field.

In 2015, DoSomething.org recognized him as the world’s most charitable athlete. His generosity includes funding life-saving brain surgery for a 10-month-old baby suffering from seizures and donating $165,000 to the cancer center that treated his mother. More recently, during the coronavirus pandemic, he reportedly gave $1 million to hospitals in Lisbon and Porto.

One of Ronaldo’s greatest contributions to Portugal goes beyond financial donations. By using his platform to advocate for the world’s most vulnerable, he leaves a lasting impact not only on those he directly helps, but also by setting an example of generosity and compassion.

Solutions and Hope

Identifying the causes of child poverty in Portugal is the first step toward creating sustainable solutions and the Portuguese government has taken key measures to build a country where children have the opportunity to thrive.

Biennial reports on the Child Guarantee National Action Plan will track the program’s impact and help lawmakers make necessary adjustments to combat childhood poverty in Portugal. The 2024 report highlights new initiatives, including reduced health care costs for children and youth, expanded access to education for vulnerable communities and key housing reforms.

Being poor in Portugal is still a reality for many children, but growing advocacy, stronger government initiatives and rising public awareness are paving the way toward meaningful change. Improved data collection, especially for migrant children, will further strengthen efforts to build lasting solutions.

– Fernanda Nilson

Fernanda is based in North Charleston, SC, USA and focuses on Good News and Technology for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

, ,

5 Key Facts About Being Poor in Cambodia

Being Poor in CambodiaGrowing up poor in Cambodia remains a complex reality for many children, even as the country achieved impressive economic growth over the last two decades and reached lower-middle-income status in 2015. The COVID-19 pandemic reversed years of progress, exposing vulnerabilities and pushing thousands of families back below the poverty line. Being poor in Cambodia continues to mean more than just income, it involves overlapping disadvantages that affect survival and opportunity.

Poverty by the Numbers

As of 2022, about 17.8% of Cambodians live below the national poverty line. For children, the situation is more concerning. Around 22% of children live in monetary poverty, while nearly 49% are multidimensionally poor, lacking essentials like clean water, housing, education or health care. Rural children face the harshest challenges. Only 22% of rural children escape significant deprivation, compared to 68% in urban areas. Overcrowded housing, poor sanitation and limited school access leave millions without a fair chance to thrive.

The Pandemic Deepened Inequality

COVID-19 devastated Cambodia’s key economic sectors of tourism, construction and garment exports. Job losses forced incomes to plummet, and families resorted to debt or pulled children out of school to cope. The government expanded the IDPoor cash transfer program to protect vulnerable families. IDPoor began in 2007 in rural areas and expanded nationwide in 2016. It identifies poor households through community assessments. During the pandemic, Cambodia expanded IDPoor so families could register for support when they needed it most. The program reached millions and kept many from sliding deeper into crisis, though the payments were often not enough to cover basic needs like food, medicine and school costs.

Families Experience Overlapping Barriers to Opportunity

Even families just above the poverty line often cannot access services that do not exist in their communities. A child may have food but no school, housing or clean water nearby. These overlapping deprivations trap children in cycles of disadvantage. For younger children, education, sanitation and housing account for more than half of the barriers. Lack of early childhood education and poor nutrition hinder long-term growth. For adolescents, overcrowded housing and weak school quality limit their chances of escaping poverty in adulthood. These realities show that being poor in Cambodia is about missing opportunities as much as it is about lacking money.

Nutrition and Education Programs Show Promise

Nutrition programs for mothers and infants have grown in recent years. UNICEF and the Ministry of Health focus on better antenatal care, micronutrient supplements and promoting breastfeeding. Exclusive breastfeeding rates are at 65%, but nearly one-third of children under 5 remain stunted, showing that more progress is needed.

Efforts to keep adolescents in school are also showing results. Scholarships tied to IDPoor status support secondary school attendance. During COVID-19, cash transfers helped families cover school fees and supplies. Surveys also found that around 80% of beneficiaries reported improved household well-being, reducing the risk of children dropping out. These combined efforts give families the chance to overcome some of the barriers that come with being poor in Cambodia.

Steps Towards Change

Cambodia has already taken key steps to reduce poverty. The IDPoor system proved that targeted support can shield families during crises and remains the backbone of the country’s social protection system.

Experts recommend a multisectoral approach to accelerate progress. Expanding access to clean water and sanitation in rural areas, improving housing and reducing overcrowding and strengthening early childhood education programs can all have lasting impacts.

With sustained effort, Cambodia can achieve its Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of halving child poverty by 2030. For families living with the daily reality of being poor in Cambodia, these solutions represent hope for a brighter future.

Why It Matters

Growing up poor is not only about income, it is about opportunity. For Cambodia’s nearly 18 million people, it can mean the difference between thriving or being left behind. Recent progress shows that change is possible. Economic growth, stronger social protection and international support have already helped lift many Cambodian families out of poverty. By continuing to widen access to education, health care and essential services, the country has the chance to break cycles of hardship and create brighter futures.

– Lucy Williams

Lucy is based in Wrexham, UK and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pixabay

, ,

Everything You Need To Know About Poverty in Malaysia

Poverty in MalaysiaOver the past decades, the impressive economic strides have brought down the official poverty rate in Malaysia. Yet, significant challenges remain, especially across rural regions and within Indigenous communities.

Current Poverty Landscape

  • National Progress: By 2019, Malaysia’s national poverty rate had declined to 5.6%, a testament to decades of targeted policy and development.
  • Staying Above Global Benchmarks: Despite this progress, disparities persist compared to other countries. An October 2019 World Bank blog emphasizes the urgent need to update the country’s poverty line, which has not kept pace with cost-of-living changes.

Who Is Being Left Behind?

  • Indigenous Communities – The Orang Asli: The Indigenous Orang Asli remain among Malaysia’s most disadvantaged groups. A 2021 report by Malaysia’s Department of Orang Asli Development (JAKOA) highlights this community’s staggering poverty rate of 89.4%.
  • Historical Context: Earlier, in 1999, 50.9% of the Orang Asli population lived in poverty and 15.4% in hardcore poverty. This far exceeds the national averages of 7.5% (overall poverty) and 1.4% (hardcore poverty).
  • Income Disparities: Earlier studies (2013–2014) showed that 34% of Orang Asli lived below the national poverty line and nearly one in three earned less than RM1,000 (about $236) per month.

Root Causes of Persistent Inequality

  • Outdated Poverty Line: The outdated national poverty threshold fails to reflect rising living expenses, effectively underestimating the scale of deprivation.
  • Structural Marginalization: The Orang Asli’s high poverty levels stem from limited access to education, economic opportunities and essential services. These include electricity, clean water and health care, which are especially lacking in remote settlements.
  • Bureaucratic Hurdles: A 2024 Malay Mail assessment points to bureaucratic rigidity, inefficient service delivery and insufficient community participation as key barriers to progress.

Government Strategies and Frameworks

  • Shared Prosperity Vision 2030 (SPV 2030): Launched in 2019 and formalized in 2020, SPV 2030 pledges “sustainable growth along with fair and equitable distribution” across income groups, ethnicities and regions. It includes the Orang Asli, women, youth and senior citizens.
  • Policy Goals and Gaps: Analysis cautions that while SPV 2030 stresses equity, it sometimes remains too focused on income distribution and lacks clarity around enabling basic needs like health and education.
  • Implementation in Planning: Malaysia’s Twelfth Malaysia Plan (2021–2025) aligns with SPV 2030, highlighting economic empowerment, environmental sustainability and social equity. However, critics question whether marginalized groups like the Orang Asli are effectively prioritized.

How Global Advocates Can Help

  • Push for Poverty Line Revision: Advocate for Malaysia to revise its national poverty threshold to reflect current costs, making anti-poverty programs more impactful.
  • Target Indigenous Inclusion: Support NGO, U.N. and community-led initiatives that empower the Orang Asli through education, infrastructure and cultural preservation, amplifying JAKOA’s efforts.
  • Champion Equitable Implementation: Promote accountability in SPV 2030 and the 12th Malaysia Plan—ensuring that resources reach those most in need, not just top-down frameworks.
  • Lift Marginalized Voices: Advocate for participatory policymaking, where Orang Asli communities shape programs designed for their benefit, ensuring sustainability and local relevance.

Conclusion

Malaysia’s battle against poverty has made remarkable progress. Yet, systemic inequities continue to constrain its most vulnerable citizens, particularly within Indigenous communities. By advocating for updated poverty measurement, better policy implementation and inclusive participation, global partners such as nonprofit organizations can support Malaysia in translating its commitment to shared prosperity into real change. This also helps ensure that no one is left behind.

– Paige Javor

Paige is based in Boulder, CO, USA and focuses on Global Health and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr