Information and stories about poverty reduction.

, ,

Poverty in Tajikistan: The Impact of Remittances

Poverty in Tajikistan: The Impact of Remittances The Republic of Tajikistan – a landlocked country bordered by Kyrgyzstan, China, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan – is the smallest country in Central Asia. Although rich in natural resources, Tajikistan remains the region’s poorest country, with more than 2 million people living on less than $3.65 per day. Economic growth, driven largely by remittances, contributed to a decline in the poverty rate by around 9% in 2024, with GDP growth estimated at 8.4%. While these gains are encouraging, remittances alone cannot ensure long-term stability and ongoing efforts are necessary to improve living standards.

Remittances and Poverty in Tajikistan

Remittances—monetary transfers made by migrants working abroad—play a central role in Tajikistan’s economy. In 2024, remittances accounted for nearly half of the country’s GDP, with most funds sent by Tajik citizens working in Russia. These transfers help cover essential needs and drive domestic consumption. Tajikistan experienced an economic growth rate that averaged above 7% over the last decade, reducing the number of people living in poverty from 32% of the population in 2009 to around 9% in 2024. While estimates from 2023 suggested that more than 20% of Tajiks were still living in poverty, the decline in 2024 was particularly stark.

Although remittances have been effective in reducing poverty by bolstering private consumption and imports. The country’s reliance on economic success in other nations leaves its fragile economy vulnerable to disturbances and crises. As a result, endurable systemic changes within the country are critical to ensuring improved conditions for those experiencing poverty in Tajikistan.

Sustainable Development Strategies

In its National Development Strategy, the Government of Tajikistan set a goal to double or triple domestic incomes between 2016 and 2030; however, reaching this target will require a changed economic growth model centered around a dynamic private sector. Tajikistan maintains strong potential for economic growth due to a younger, growing population and the country’s potential for success in profitable sectors, such as agriculture, food processing, water, hydropower and tourism. In addition, the country is abundant in valuable natural resources and minerals like petroleum and natural gas, aluminum, gold, silver and limestone. The Tajik Aluminium Company (TALCO), one of Central Asia’s largest producers, is a major contributor to the national economy.

Despite this, weak institutions and limited business infrastructure continue to hinder growth. Labor force utilization remains the lowest in the region at just 44%, suggesting that many citizens are underemployed or unable to access productive jobs. To address these challenges, investments in education, transportation and digital infrastructure are key. Improving access to finance, strengthening energy sector efficiency and promoting inclusive economic competition can also support job creation and long-term poverty alleviation.

Looking Ahead

For 2025, the World Bank projects 6.5% GDP growth and an 8.2% decline in the poverty rate. While these numbers are promising, rising global uncertainty poses risks to economic improvement in the region. Officials can potentially expedite reforms in the private and public sectors to support job growth and remedy longstanding poverty in Tajikistan. Strengthening institutions, improving economic resilience and expanding access to opportunity could help ensure that recent gains in poverty reduction are not only maintained but expanded.

– Erin Hellhake

Erin s based in Old Bridge, NJ, USA and focuses on Global Health and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Catalonia’s UBI Program: A Bold Strategy for Poverty Reduction

Catalonia’s UBI ProgramIn 2024, Catalonia launched one of Europe’s most ambitious Universal Basic Income (UBI) initiatives. The year 2025 marks the first full year of its UBI pilot program, with 5,000 residents receiving unconditional monthly payments of $906 for adults and $400 for children. Catalonia’s UBI program reflects a growing interest in new economic security solutions across Europe. It aims to reduce poverty while improving mental health and employment flexibility.

The Government of Catalonia tasked the Office of the Pilot Plan for UBI with managing the two-year experiment. The team selected the 5,000 participants from two groups: 2,500 randomly chosen across Catalonia and 2,500 residents of two lower-income villages. The pilot aims to assess the effects of unconditional cash distributions on various social and economic outcomes, which do not replace any existing benefits. This approach allows for a comparative analysis to determine the true efficacy of unconditional income in improving social and economic conditions.

Results Are Yet To Be Seen

The Catalan government has not released any official outcome data. A comprehensive evaluation of Catalonia’s UBI program will occur in 2026 when researchers assess income changes, employment, health and well-being across recipients and a designated control group. Sociologist Sergi Raventós, who initially implemented the program, emphasized, “This is the first time something like this has been done anywhere in the world.”

In an interview with InfoLibre, Raventós spoke about his belief that UBI should serve as a central redistributive tool for the 21st-century welfare state. He has also previously stated that recipients of UBI often report lower stress and greater freedom to make meaningful life decisions. Results from other UBI programs back up this assertion. However, given the novelty of Catalonia’s pilot program, such results remain impossible to predict before the release of official data.

Learning From Global Examples

Catalonia’s UBI program builds on lessons from earlier UBI trials around the world. From 2017 to 2018, Finland tested a UBI pilot that gave 2,000 unemployed people $635 monthly. Although the funds didn’t significantly impact employment rates, participants experienced reduced anxiety, higher life satisfaction and increased confidence. Many used the income to invest in personal projects, such as starting businesses, volunteering or focusing on education.

Similarly, in the United States, the SEED program in Stockton, California, gave 125 people $500 per month for two years. Recipients found full-time jobs at double the rate of non-recipients and reported improved emotional health. These findings suggest that UBI can enhance well-being, even without major effects on employment outcomes.

However, Catalonia’s pilot program is unique in its effort’s scale and duration. The program includes a larger sample size, higher monthly payments and a design that reaches urban and rural communities. The Catalan team is also collaborating with academics to ensure rigorous evaluation to help determine whether UBI improves recipients’ quality of life across various metrics.

Implications for Global Poverty Strategy

The results of Catalonia’s UBI program may likely influence poverty policy across the globe. Governments in South Korea, Kenya and Brazil have also explored unconditional payments, though few programs match Catalonia’s scope.

The Catalan program’s results will provide more substantive data on whether direct cash support helps people escape cycles of low-income instability. As cost-of-living crises grow worldwide, Catalonia’s experiment could change how countries think about poverty, security and the role of government in economic planning and dignity.

– Kelsey Eisen

Kelsey is based in San Francisco, CA, USA and focuses on Business and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Life After the Volcano: Montserrat Rebuilding Efforts

Montserrat Rebuilding EffortsNearly three decades after the Soufrière Hills volcano erupted in 1995, transforming the lush Caribbean island of Montserrat into a disaster zone, the scars remain etched in both the landscape and the lives of its people. Between 1995 and 1997, eruptions buried the capital, Plymouth, in ash and lava, displacing more than two-thirds of the population and rendering vast swaths of land uninhabitable.

Today, Montserrat rebuilding efforts continue to affect thousands of residents, who face persistent poverty, limited resources and the weight of long-term displacement.

The Lingering Impact of the Soufrière Hills Eruption

The volcano’s devastation destroyed key infrastructure, including roads, utilities and government buildings. According to the Montserrat Statistics Department, more than 60% of the island’s population was forced to evacuate permanently. Those who stayed faced the challenge of resettling in the island’s northern part, which had limited infrastructure at the time.

The economic collapse that followed was severe. The World Bank reported that Montserrat’s gross domestic product (GDP) fell more than significantly in the immediate aftermath of the eruptions. As of 2022, about 36% of Montserrat’s residents live below the poverty line.

Montserrat’s Long Road to Recovery and Housing Stability

Housing insecurity remains a major issue in Montserrat’s rebuilding efforts. Many families still live in transitional shelters or informal homes lacking adequate weatherproofing or sanitation. The Post-Disaster Needs Assessment conducted by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 2021 identified housing rehabilitation and expansion as a top priority.

International aid has played a vital role in tackling these issues. The Joint SDG Fund, in partnership with the Government of Montserrat, supports projects targeting poverty reduction, workforce development and sustainable housing. Similarly, the Montserrat Budget Support Programme, backed by the U.K.’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, has helped maintain essential services and fund housing projects in the north.

The COVID-19 pandemic deepened economic hardship and food insecurity. In response, the UNDP issued emergency grants to farmers and fishers to support food production during lockdowns. Still, Montserrat rebuilding efforts remain slow. Construction costs, limited access to credit and climate-related risks continue to challenge progress. However, the Former Premier of Montserrat, Joseph Farrell, has emphasized the need for resilient housing models to withstand future shocks.

Despite obstacles, Montserrat’s people have shown resilience. Civic groups, returning diaspora members and entrepreneurs are working to revitalize communities and small businesses. The Montserrat Sustainable Development Plan outlines goals for economic diversification and infrastructure growth. 

A Path Toward Long-Term Recovery

Montserrat’s experience is a stark example of how small island nations face compounded risks from natural disasters, poverty and limited resources. The island’s slow but steady recovery highlights the importance of long-term investment, disaster resilience and community-driven planning.

“The resilience of the Montserratian people is unmatched,” said U.N. Resident Coordinator Didier Trebucq in a recent visit. “But to truly rebuild, we must continue supporting efforts that prioritize equity, sustainability and local leadership.”

While the volcano still lingers beneath the surface, so does the enduring hope of a resilient, more secure Montserrat.

– Giovanni Garcia

Giovanni is based in Long Beach, CA, USA and focuses on Good News and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

, ,

5 Countries Leading the Fight Against Poverty – And Winning

Fight Against PovertyAround the world, many developing and emerging countries are leading the fight against poverty. Among them, some are achieving remarkable success through innovative strategies.

China 

China has recently made significant investments in rural infrastructure to connect remote populations to economic opportunities, with the ultimate goal of reducing poverty. Between 2006 and 2015, the country, with the support of the World Bank, rehabilitated approximately 1,299 roads. These projects have directly benefited more than 1.3 million people by improving their connectivity and access to essential services. These infrastructure improvements not only enhance access to these essential services but also facilitate economic growth by linking rural areas to larger markets, enabling local businesses to thrive.

Beyond road rehabilitation, China has implemented several other initiatives to enhance rural infrastructure and lead the fight against poverty. For instance, investments in irrigation and drainage facilities have directly improved agricultural production conditions. This is enabling farmers to adjust crop structures, develop large-scale breeding programs and engage in processing and non-agricultural industries, thereby reducing poverty.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh has made significant strides in education and workforce development, increasing literacy rates and creating new job opportunities. The country, still one of the neediest in the world, has been making notable progress through two key areas: education and workforce development. In terms of education, Bangladesh has seen significant improvements in its literacy rate. In 2021, the country’s literacy rate reached 76.36% (15 years old and above), reflecting a 1.45% increase from 2020. This improvement demonstrates the nation’s ongoing efforts to boost educational access and quality.

In addition to its focus on education, Bangladesh has prioritized job creation, with significant growth in the tourism sector. As the industry expands, it is driving the creation of jobs across various fields, “including hospitality, transportation, food services, handicrafts and retail.” This tourism growth is contributing to both economic development and job opportunities, particularly in rural and underserved areas.

Ethiopia 

Ethiopia has been focusing on agricultural development, exemplified by the Agricultural Growth Program. This program has enabled more than 700,000 farmers to benefit from the initiative, leading to a 25% revenue increase. Farmers’ productivity has risen by approximately 10%, contributing to poverty reduction and economic stability in these remote communities.

Furthermore, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) collaborates with the Ethiopian government to enhance the population’s living conditions, focusing on agricultural productivity, food security and rural development. IFAD supports smallholder farmers, pastoralists and agro-pastoralists with loans, helping them purchase the necessary equipment to enhance their productivity and escape the cycle of poverty.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s economic reforms and trade liberalization have created millions of jobs and boosted growth. The country was once among the most impoverished in the world. However, its government has achieved remarkable economic growth relatively quickly. Thanks to the Doi Moi campaign, which focused primarily on agricultural reforms, land was redistributed among small farmers, significantly boosting farm productivity and improving food security. This transformation helped lift millions out of poverty and laid the foundation for broader economic development.

However, the reforms extended beyond agriculture. The government implemented measures to reduce the budget deficit, stabilize the economy and attract foreign investment. A key objective was to integrate Vietnam into the global economy by promoting trade liberalization and joining international organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO). These efforts led to a surge in exports, the expansion of the manufacturing sector and the creation of millions of jobs, positioning Vietnam as one of the fastest-growing economies in the world.

Rwanda

Rwanda has made significant progress toward achieving universal health care, ensuring that even its most vulnerable citizens can access essential medical services. Since the 1994 genocide, the country has significantly improved health care access, a fact that was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, when 82% of the population received at least one dose of the vaccine within two years.

Moreover, Rwanda has prioritized the expansion of health care infrastructure to improve accessibility. Since August 2021, the Ministry of Health has established 1,179 health posts nationwide, particularly in underserved communities.

In conclusion, these countries demonstrate that targeted investments in infrastructure, education, agriculture, health care and economic reform can drive significant progress in the fight against poverty. Their diverse strategies offer valuable lessons for other developing nations striving to build more inclusive and resilient economies.

– Eléonore Bonnaterre

Eléonore Bonnaterre is based in London and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pexels

,

Which Is More Severe Urban or Rural Poverty?

Urban or Rural PovertyApproximately 700 million people worldwide currently live in poor conditions. “More than three-quarters of the global extreme [impoverished] lived in rural areas in 2022” and more than half live in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Rural areas typically have a higher extreme poverty rate than urban areas. There is an 11% difference in urban and rural poverty rates, with the rural poverty rate being 16% and the urban poverty rate being 5%. In contrast, in other regions, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, the rural poverty rate is 26% higher, 46%, than the urban poverty rate, which is 20%.

Rural Poverty

Rural areas are typically defined as regions outside towns and cities, often called the countryside. They consist of open land for farming, villages or towns with fewer buildings and a low population. With a lower population density and a heavy dependence on the agricultural industry, rural areas are necessary to a country’s overall landscape. They contribute to providing food, natural resources and a sense of community.

Rural poverty is defined as “residents of non-urbanized areas or non-urban clusters who earn below the income threshold” in their country. Despite impactful contributions, rural populations do not have comfortable access to healthcare facilities, transportation and education services. Residents have fewer options for resources, resulting in them struggling to seek help or improve their situation. Several rural tenants do not have a secured income because they are either unemployed or participate in seasonal work due to a short supply of job offers.

Urban Poverty

Urban areas are cities, towns and suburbs with high population density. They have many apartment buildings, public transit and telecommunications. Most urban residents work non-agricultural jobs. Metropolitan areas are crossroads of economic activity, cultural exchange and innovation, offering support systems in fast-paced environments and meeting the population’s needs.

Urban poverty is “residents of urbanized areas (50,000+ people) or urban clusters (2,500-50,000 people) who earn below the income threshold” of their country. While there are support systems for the urban population, many individuals struggle with finances because of inadequate housing, inaccessibility to education and healthcare, unemployment and high exposure to environmental hazards such as natural disasters or air pollution.

Is Urban or Rural Poverty More Severe?

Urban and rural poverty have their complexities. Rural poverty is more hidden and persistent within the countryside community, while urban poverty is more visible and acute. The majority of the neediest individuals live in rural areas, but an estimated 200 million people in urban regions experience poverty. “Many issues faced by urban poverty mirror those experienced in rural poverty, such as limited or no access to education and healthcare” in countries like India, China and Nigeria.

Urban and rural inhabitants have key differences in economic opportunities, infrastructure and services, social isolation, overcrowding and cost of living. The rural economy is strongly related to agriculture, mining and small businesses. In contrast, the urban economy relies on job markets, including manufacturing, services and technology. In rural geographical locations and small neighborhoods, individuals do not receive as much social support as in urban societies that contain social networks. Therefore, rural poverty is more severe than urban poverty due to the “difficulties in infrastructural access/fundamental service limitations in running economic activities.”

The Future

Rural poverty is expected to decline, while urban poverty may persist. In 2030, rural poverty will decrease by 26% to 293 million from 395 million and urban poverty will decrease from 203 million to 200 million. Poverty-reduction bills like the Global Malnutrition Prevention and Treatment Act confront both forms of poverty so everyone can live a standard life with food and health care resources.

– Makayla Johnson

Makayla is based in Cary, NC, USA and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Freepik

, ,

Poverty Reduction in Puerto Rico

Poverty Reduction in Puerto Rico Puerto Rico, a United States (U.S.) commonwealth and popular tourist destination, stretches from San Juan on the east coast to Cabo Rojo on the west. The island is known for its rich history, vibrant culture and natural beauty, including one of the world’s three bioluminescent bays. However, residents face persistent challenges behind the tourism appeal, including government corruption, annual hurricanes and a fragile electrical grid that causes frequent power outages.

While hotels and tourist areas often maintain backup generators, many residents experience repeated electricity and water service disruptions. These conditions, combined with limited access to federal assistance programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), contribute to widespread hardship. The poverty rate in Puerto Rico stands at approximately 43%, twice more than that of Mississippi, at roughly 19%, making it the most impoverished U.S. state.

Rural Poverty and the Gap in Essential Services

Beyond infrastructure and assistance gaps, many rural communities in Puerto Rico face added barriers due to inadequate public transportation and limited access to affordable housing. In these areas, residents often travel long distances for medical care, groceries or work, making daily life more difficult. Small businesses also struggle to thrive, as inconsistent services and high operational costs pose serious limitations. These factors deepen economic inequality, especially in mountainous and isolated municipalities that attract less government attention. Addressing these overlooked dimensions of poverty is essential to ensuring that recovery and development reach all corners of the island.

Advocacy Through Music and Media

Recent years have brought increased visibility to the island’s economic challenges. Puerto Rican artist Bad Bunny has used his music and platform to highlight living conditions on the island. His song “El Apagón” focused on energy instability, while “Una Velita” addressed hardships in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria. These ongoing efforts have helped draw attention to the realities many Puerto Rico residents face, bringing national and international focus to long-standing infrastructure and social welfare issues.

Legislative Efforts to Address Child Poverty

Resident Commissioner Pablo José Hernández introduced new legislation aimed at reducing child poverty by expanding access to the Child Tax Credit. The measure has contributed to a decrease in the child poverty rate, dropping from 55% to 39%. “This legislation represents an important step for Puerto Rico’s economic development, focusing on our families so they can move forward, build a prosperous future on our island,” Hernández said.

Expanding Economic Relief Through Advocacy

The Hispanic Federation’s Take Action for Puerto Rico! campaign continues to support anti-poverty initiatives. The organization has helped secure higher funding for programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and a larger federal share of Medicaid. Currently, the campaign focuses on expanding access to SNAP benefits. Advocates say this would help close the gap between services available to mainland residents and those living in Puerto Rico, especially during emergencies.

A Path Forward

Poverty reduction in Puerto Rico and the country’s economic recovery depend on sustained efforts from lawmakers, nonprofit organizations and advocates. While new legislation and community initiatives have led to measurable progress, addressing disparities in federal support remains a key issue. Ongoing advocacy and investment could continue to shape Puerto Rico’s efforts to reduce poverty and strengthen resilience for the future.

– Cheyenne C Weller

Cheyenne is based in Boston, MA,USA and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty Reduction

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty ReductionGlobal leaders often play a critical role in driving poverty reduction by casting decisive votes and implementing impactful policies. Indeed, around the world, several leaders have introduced programs that contribute to measurable poverty alleviation. Here are five global leaders who have focused on poverty reduction in their countries.

5 Global Leaders Driving Poverty Reduction

  1. Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping serves as the president of China, one of the world’s largest economies. Since he assumed office, the Chinese government reports that it has lifted 98.99 million people out of extreme poverty, defined as living on less than $1.69 per day. Poverty reduction has remained a central focus of national policy during Xi’s leadership.
    The nearly 100 million people affected by this effort live in diverse regions. The government supported more than 128,000 villages in improving community development.
  2. Katrín Jakobsdóttir. Katrín Jakobsdóttir is the Prime Minister of Iceland, one of the northernmost countries in the world. Jakobsdóttir is a well-respected feminist, known for her achievements in addressing poverty among women. In 2018, her administration enacted a law that prohibits unequal pay between men and women for the same work. In 2017, 13.6% of women in Iceland lived in poverty. Following the new law, that number dropped to 11.3% in 2018. By 2023, the poverty rate had fallen further to 8.9% for women and 9% for men.
  3. Narendra Modi. Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister of India, the most populous country in the world, located in South Asia. Since he took office in 2014, the Indian government reports that it has lifted 250 million people out of poverty. Over the last decade, India’s GDP per capita rose by $2,000, while 17% of the population moved above the poverty line. Modi’s administration continues to focus on sustainable development as part of its broader economic strategy.
  4. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the President of Brazil, the largest country in Latin America. His success in reducing poverty is largely attributed to a social program he implemented called “Bolsa Família.” This program has reached more than 50 million people in Brazil, offering families in poverty financial benefits on the condition that they attend regular medical check-ups and ensure their children receive an education. This compromise has shown to be effective.
  5. Paul Kagame. Paul Kagame is the President of Rwanda, a country in central Africa near Lake Victoria. Upon taking office in 2000, Kagame launched a program called Rwanda Vision 2020, which has exceeded its initial expectations. In 2000, Rwanda’s poverty rate was 75.2%. However, by 2024, this figure had fallen to 38.2%. Rwanda has invested in agriculture, health care and education to improve livelihoods across the country. However, ongoing regional conflict involving the M23 militia poses challenges to further development.

Leadership and Poverty Reduction

These political figures demonstrate a range of approaches to poverty reduction, from equal pay laws to social protection programs. While each country faces unique challenges, the common thread among these leaders is their early and sustained commitment to addressing poverty through policy and investment. Their efforts offer useful models for other nations and underscore the importance of leadership in global poverty reduction.

– Nicholas East

Nicholas is based in Ashby, MA, USA and focuses on Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

The Link Between Disability and Poverty in Benin

Disability and Poverty in BeninBenin is a country located in West Africa. From 1872 to 1960, Benin was a French Colony that France used for exporting enslaved people. Liberated from French control, Benin ended up with the cultural and economic ramifications of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. In the 1970s, Benin restructured its economy using socialist principles. However, this did not improve the country’s economic or political stability, and by the 1990s, Benin shifted into privatizing its economy. Although Benin is one of the more economically developed countries in West Africa, more than 36% of the population still lives in poverty. There are approximately 92,495 people with disabilities living in Benin. Many of those most affected by poverty have physical and mental disabilities that make their chance of escaping poverty without assistance nearly impossible. Here are seven facts about the links between disability and poverty in Benin.

1. Increased Health Risks

A lack of hygiene and sanitation can lead to neglected tropical diseases, and this coincides with disability and poverty in Benin. About 11% of disabled Beninese attributed neglected tropical diseases as the cause of their disabilities. These include leprosy, with 214 annual cases, and lymphatic filariasis, which 6.6 million are at risk for. The most common forms of disabilities include visual, and hearing impairments, cerebral driving impairments, motor disabilities, intellectual disabilities and psychosocial disabilities.

Even though people with disabilities often require more medical attention, the average Beninese family is only able to financially cover one to two doctor visits a year. With increased access to health care, the rate of preventable disabilities could drop considerably and the care provided to disabled individuals would significantly increase their standard of living. One can see this in the World Health Organization-supported Assurance Pour Le Renforcement Du Capital Humain or ARCH program, which provides health insurance to the poorest Beninese communities. The results of this program have been massive, as more than 800,000 of the poorest people in Benin have enrolled in free health insurance and can now use public health facilities if they live near them.

2. Hazardous Living Conditions

Canes, wheelchairs and prosthetics are often unaffordable to those who experience disability and poverty in Benin, severely limiting mobility and safety in and out of the home. Disabled people who live alone are more likely to be at risk of falling or injury and can go long periods of time without needed assistance. Conversely, those living with family members are more likely to be victims of neglect or abuse than able-bodied individuals. By creating programs that provide canes, wheelchairs and prosthetics as well as care plans to people with disabilities and their families, Benin could prevent these hazardous living conditions.

3. Community Discrimination and Violence

When isolated by their community, impoverished people with disabilities’ access to emergency care, housing and social programs diminishes. Even more alarming in some Beninese communities is the traditional practice of killing babies born with physical abnormalities. In recent years, however, Benin authorities have begun a door-to-door campaign to raise awareness of the scientific causes behind infant deformities. This has resulted in fewer occurrences of disability-motivated infanticide as well as societal stigmatization towards people with disabilities. Educational and community-based programs such as this could put an end to the discrimination and violence against disabled Beninese.

4. Familial Liabilities

Without familial support, a majority of those impacted by disability and poverty in Benin do not have the means to afford basic necessities. Thus, households often consider them to be a financial burden. Additionally, families experience frequent blame for a child’s disability as people in some religions in Benin see disabilities as punishment for the parents’ misdeeds. Because of these misconceptions, the businesses of relatives of those with disabilities often struggle to retain customers.

The good news is that The Global Disability Fund has raised almost $400,000 as well as brought together four UN agencies, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WHO to meet with government leaders of Benin to advocate for better education on the causes of disabilities and inclusive treatment of people with disabilities in the country. With disability support from the government along with information campaigns about the humanity of those living with disabilities, families taking care of disabled loved ones will have a better chance of enduring poverty.

5. Limited Access to Education

Access to education is already limited for those suffering from poverty in Benin. More than 47% of the population is considered illiterate, and 77.5% of Beninese with disabilities are uneducated. Furthermore, only 2% of disabled children are actively attending school. With an increase in financial support to schools that can offer focused learning programs to those with disabilities, the option for education would become a reality for numerous children in Benin.

6. High Risk of Unemployment

More than 80% of disabled people are unemployed in Benin, causing many to fall below the poverty line. Benin’s labor code does include provisions to protect the employment rights of workers with disabilities. Unfortunately, this code often goes unenforced, as many people with disabilities have reported workplace and hiring discrimination. Fortunately, The World Bank’s Youth Inclusion Project is working to end employment discrimination in Benin. Although it does not currently have a program set up for people with disabilities, by providing vulnerable youth with technical skills, the project has helped employ 5,000 young people with little to no education since its start in 2021. With the support of external employment programs, such as expanding The Youth Inclusion Project to involve people with disabilities, the lives of many disabled people will most certainly be improved.

7. Government Oversight

A majority of public facilities are not accessible for those struggling with disability and poverty in Benin, including schools, transportation and courts. Moreover, there are reports that people with motor disabilities are frequently unable to access polling stations, depriving them of the ability to participate in the democratic process of voting. There is, however, growing government support for the proposed Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act which would guarantee certain rights such as voting, education and legal support.

Looking Ahead

As a result of the above reasons, poverty in Benin disproportionately affect those with disabilities. Despite economic growth over the past few years, Benin is still one of the poorest countries in the world. Because of this, Benin continues to rely on foreign aid to fund their government’s primary and developmental budgets. Nevertheless, there is still hope for disabled people in Benin suffering from poverty as national and international disability services move to invest in educational, medical and employment opportunities. This kind of financial and social support will allow people with disabilities a chance at life and acceptance in Benin. 

– Amelia Dutch Player

Amelia is based in Savannah, GA, USA and focuses on Global Health and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Tackling Data Bias in Poverty Metrics: From MDGs to SDGs

Poverty MetricsPoverty alleviation remains a core focus of global development efforts under the 2030 United Nations (U.N.) Agenda. However, questions continue to arise about the accuracy and inclusivity of the metrics that define and measure poverty—especially in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) legacy. Critics point to a persistent data bias in poverty metrics, which has become even more pronounced with the rise of predictive artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven development planning.

Overly Ambitious MDGs

The MDGs, followed by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), initially aimed to achieve basic development milestones but failed to demonstrate significant progress toward sustainable development in practice. The U.N. introduced the MDGs in 2000 to address extreme global poverty.

During the early rollout of the MDGs, many observers predicted near-certain failure due to “overly ambitious goals” and “unrealistic expectations placed on aid.” Vague and sweeping targets relied on 1990 baseline levels for indicators such as child mortality and access to clean water—despite limited data availability. This reliance created a data void where estimates depended largely on guesswork. Many viewed the underlying assumption—that aid transfers alone could resolve poverty—as flawed, particularly given the global context shaped by capitalist globalization and historical exploitation.

The U.N. Independent Expert Advisory Group later criticized the MDGs for lacking sufficient data, noting that fewer than 70% of required indicators had consistent reporting in any five years. In response, the U.N. introduced the SDGs in 2015 with 231 indicators to address data gaps and improve goal tracking across development efforts.

The SDGs Data Revolution

The SDGs replaced the MDGs and marked a shift toward a more data-driven, metric-heavy development model. This approach emphasizes “big data” and quantifiable benchmarks to define and monitor progress. However, relying heavily on quantitative data presents challenges. In poverty metrics, numerical targets often distort or oversimplify the real issues. Numbers can obscure the theoretical debates that drive progress, obstructing efforts to address structural inequalities and the underlying causes of poverty.

The SDGs’ poverty eradication target continues to draw from a Eurocentric definition of poverty that emphasizes meeting basic needs. This narrow approach overlooks broader and more critical frameworks, such as feminist, racial, or decolonial theories. For instance, the focus on primary school enrollment as a proxy for educational progress ignores the need for vocational skills training and access to secondary or higher education. It also assumes that children who enroll in primary school will continue their education—an assumption that fails in contexts where girls often leave school early to become houseworkers or wives.

The data rarely reflects racial disparities in access to education—such as the disproportionate number of minority children unable to attend school. As a result, the metrics often look impressive on paper but lack practical value. These biases reinforce dominant ideologies and redefine development only in terms of poverty alleviation while failing to address its root causes.

Existing Gaps in Quantitative Data Use

Another growing concern is the increasing use of big data and AI to generate development metrics. AI models, trained on datasets mostly derived from Western countries, often replicate and amplify existing biases. These systems apply Eurocentric assumptions to global poverty issues and generate outputs that fail to capture the diverse realities of communities outside of the United States (U.S.) and Europe.

Critics argue for the need to complement big data with data ethnography and qualitative research. Semi-structured interviews and participatory research help uncover the social contexts behind data points. Without such methods, AI systems risk embedding and reproducing the same structural biases that shape current development models.

Looking Ahead

The shift from MDGs to SDGs introduced measurable targets, but the overemphasis on quantitative indicators could undermine the understanding of poverty as a complex, context-specific issue. While the MDGs struggled due to data gaps, the SDGs may now rely too heavily on numbers that fail to reflect lived experience. To build a more accurate and inclusive global development agenda, future efforts can potentially embrace a multidimensional approach—one that incorporates local knowledge, cultural context and qualitative insights.

– Autumn Joseph

Autumn is based in London, UK and focuses on Business and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

SIDS4 Brings New Hope for Small Island Developing States

SIDS4In May 2024, the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) gathered at the fourth U.N. International Conference (SIDS4) held in Barbuda and Antigua. After being recognized internationally for their multifaceted struggles towards poverty, SIDS4 proposed the Antigua and Barbuda Agenda for SIDS (ABAS).

Disaster-Prone

SIDS are countries among the most disaster-prone areas of the world, frequently experiencing tsunamis, floods, sea-level rise and more. These factors result in the entrapment of an ongoing poverty cycle. While receiving lower levels of international development financing, about 20.7 million of the SIDS population faces poverty.

These countries reside in the Caribbean, the Pacific, and the Atlantic, Indian Ocean and South China Sea (AIS). The U.N. Office of Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) has committed to numerous initiatives that invest in sustainable futures for these citizens, as disaster costs in SIDS are among the highest in the world. In the past 50 years, these countries have lost more than $153 billion on natural disaster recuperation.

ABAS was designed to build resilient economies, create prosperous societies, promote sustainable practices, and protect environmental development. Environmental concerns and natural disasters are the overwhelming priority of the U.N., due to the cumulative impacts of irregular weather patterns and natural disaster shocks.

Just in Caribbean SIDS, the UNDRR reports that between 2000 and 2022 SIDS experienced 91% of economic losses due to tropical storms, resulting in almost $32 billion in damages. While SIDS contribute less than 1% of global GHG emissions, they are the most impacted when it comes to noticeable destruction in their communities.

Poverty Rates

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) developed a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) to determine causes and patterns in poverty rates among SIDS countries. As health and standard of living are leading contributing factors, almost 50% of the Pacific SIDS and 46% of AIS SIDS are facing poverty, according to the 2024 report.

The ABAS initiative targets preventative measures to ensure citizens will be better prepared for disasters both natural and expected. To reduce poverty, the U.N. states that they will implement “accelerated actions towards full and effective implementation of the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement.”

The U.N. plans to support the implementation of the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience, operationalizing the global goal of solving natural disaster crises and reducing risks for SIDS. Another initiative to support the vulnerable population is the allocation of pre-disaster funds to build resilience and prevent a never-ending cycle of poverty.

After declaring in 1992 that SIDS were a special case regarding environment and social development, the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development committed to providing the necessary aid to meet sustainable long-term goals. With unique vulnerabilities such as small size remoteness, biodiversity loss and narrow resource space, the U.N. continues to this day to create programs of action.

The work from ABAS continues to work towards its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of lessening the poverty rate in SIDS countries, policy intervention, and allowing access to international funding. Only with cross-regional research on the direct impacts of natural disasters on poverty will SIDS countries keep moving towards a more prosperous population as a whole.

– Rachael Wexler

Rachael is based in Chicago, IL, USA and focuses on Good News and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr