Archive for category: Food Security

, ,

Innovations in Poverty Eradication in Tuvalu

Poverty Eradication in TuvaluTuvalu is a small island country in the West Pacific Ocean with a small population and faces unique climate-based challenges with its development. The current basic needs poverty rate in Tuvalu is 21.5%, due to the lack of fertile land and climate-related issues affecting the local population such as many homes and crop farms consistently being damaged from storm surges. The country is especially at risk from rising sea levels and has to rely heavily on outside aid which makes development difficult due to its remote location. However, the government as well as organizations like the UN, has made considerable progress in supporting and funding innovations in poverty eradication in Tuvalu.

Land Reclamation Efforts

One of the ways Tuvalu is tackling climate issues is through reclaiming land. As Tuvalu at its highest point is only 15 feet above sea level, many communities are at risk of coastal erosion because they are too low-lying and a sea level rise as low as 8 inches could make the country uninhabitable in 100 years. A measure to solve this problem organized by the national government and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) is the Tuvalu Coastal Adaptation Project which began in June 2017.

The project aims to implement protections against coastal erosion and increasingly intense storm and wave activity. This will involve creating 7 hectares of new land designed to withstand storm surges and stay above forecast sea level rises until at least 2100. The project is set for completion in September 2026 and so far has already seen the construction of a 2,500 foot platform on the island of Fongafale to protect essential infrastructure and coastal homes. The new land can be used to relocate the most vulnerable residents and to provide government and community services on safe ground. 

Improvements in Food Security

On the island of Nui, violent hurricanes make traditional crop farming difficult and food security very uncertain. Innovative solutions are essential to ensuring food security for the small community living there. 

One of these innovations in poverty eradication in Tuvalu is the introduction of food cubes on the island, where people can plant crops in movable containers instead of in the vulnerable soil by the shore. The UNDP and International Organization for Migration (IOM) has implemented these and provided them to residents as part of the Climate Security in the Pacific Project.

The food cubes have proven to be especially effective and have provide much needed security for the crops of the 500 residents on the island of Nui. The cubes are simple to set up and are easy to move to a safer location more inland by the residents in the event of a storm. The cubes have also been successful on other Tuvaluan islands such as Nukulaelae and Funafuti where food security has also improved.

Fostering Connections to Global Institutions

Tuvalu is a very remote country, it is very reliant on aid from international institutions. With the impending risk of changing weather patterns exacerbating the poverty level in the country, Tuvalu is prioritizing forming connections with organizations that can assist with tackling climate poverty.

An example of this is the Tuvalu Second Climate and Disaster Resilience Development Policy Financing from the World Bank. While the previous initiatives have been for specific projects, this loan from the World Bank to the Tuvaluan government is to ensure the fiscal resilience of the country amidst the risks of changing weather.

The loan, as well as the strengthened ties between Tuvalu and the World Bank and other monetary organizations, provides much more financial security for Tuvaluan citizens and allows local entrepreneurs and business owners to contribute more to the island state’s economy.

Looking Ahead

These innovations in poverty eradication in Tuvalu, such as cultivating connections with international organizations, can help to ensure a safe and secure future for the country and its citizens.

– James Holder

James is based in Nottingham, UK and focuses on Technology and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

, ,

Everything To Know About Hunger in Sri Lanka

Hunger in Sri LankaSri Lanka is a small island in the Indian Ocean with a population of 23.3 million. Of these residents, 7.4% are malnourished, and the country currently holds a “moderate” rating on the Global Hunger Index (2025). Many of the hunger issues in Sri Lanka stem from environmental and climate-related challenges. Programs like the ENOUGH campaign are advocating for change and seeking practical solutions to address this crisis. Below are more details about hunger in Sri Lanka and potential ways to help.

Reasons for Hunger in Sri Lanka

Understanding hunger in Sri Lanka arises from the country’s location and the local living conditions. Agriculture is one of the main sources of employment in the country, and the country depends heavily on the harvesting of crops as the industry contributes 6.9% of the GDP of the country. This heavy reliance on agriculture makes the country vulnerable to severe weather that can damage crops. Rainfall in Sri Lanka varies drastically, ranging from 1,000 millimeters to 5,000 millimeters depending on the area. Floods and landslides cause crops to break down or be completely flooded.

In 2025, Cyclone Ditwah – a tropical cyclone that hit Sri Lanka in November 2025 – caused a devastating impact on both local households and the agricultural system. The rainwater buried vegetables such as paddy, and the income of farmers as well as other residents decreased. Prices of agricultural products increased due to a decrease in quantity, causing hunger in more households. Fortunately, the country stored available food sources immediately and provided soft loans to farmers who were having difficulties recovering their land from the crisis.

Lack of imported goods and price inflation also contribute to hunger in the country. Within the total caloric consumption in the country, 22% comes from imported goods. Some agricultural products, such as wheat, do not grow in Sri Lanka due to the soil conditions. The shortage of foreign exchange limits the country’s ability to import food, which causes a deficiency in food storage in Sri Lanka.

These disadvantages force locals to rely on a bland diet. This diet causes many to suffer from malnutrition, and also acts as a barrier to children’s physical development. 

Reduction of Hunger in Recent Years

Despite the unavoidable environmental damages, improvements are happening in Sri Lanka, and significantly fewer people are suffering from hunger every year. In 2025, the population that is “in moderate acute food insecurity” has decreased by 15% as of last year, and this is thanks to the World Food Programme (WFP) and other organizations. 

WFP assisted international governments in providing food rations to 1.2 million children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some students from low-income families depend on the school meals provided during lunch. To address this issue, the government of Canada redirected $200,000 USD to assist Sri Lanka in providing rations for children during the pandemic.

Farmers are also taking scientific measures to resist the harsh weather conditions. Scientists are developing climate-smart agriculture by testing flood-tolerant crop varieties. Canals and reservoirs are also being built to promote water management and to ensure water distribution and control.

Looking Towards the Future

While challenges remain, the government as well as locals are making a lot of progress to support the hunger crisis in Sri Lanka. Resolving the situation depends on developing new varieties of crops against the disadvantaged growing conditions. The nation continues to have support from the government and other nations, and it continues to make important progress in sustaining sufficient food for locals, the population suffering from hunger in Sri Lanka could be greatly reduced. 

– Jiayu Wang

Jiayu is based in Beijing, China and focuses on Good News and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

, ,

7 Things To Know About Being Poor in Puerto Rico

Being Poor in Puerto RicoBehind the vibrant culture, Caribbean architecture and the pristine, turquoise waters of the island of Puerto Rico, there lies the truth that more than one-third of its residents live in poverty, making it the poorest U.S. jurisdiction by a wide margin. While the causes are complex, poverty on the island is closely tied to economic, political and historical factors that continue to shape daily life. Here are seven things to know about being poor in Puerto Rico.

1. Poverty’s Roots in US Colonialism

Conditions of poverty have roots in U.S. colonialism. After the United States acquired the territory in the 1898 Spanish-American War, Puerto Rico’s economy transformed into a sugarcane monoculture, primarily through colonial restructuring. U.S. corporations like South Porto Rico Sugar Company and Central Aguirre Sugar Company capitalized on inexpensive Puerto Rican land and labor, consolidating localized, biodiverse farms into massive, industrial sugarcane plantations to satisfy U.S. market demand. This shift led to Puerto Rico’s reliance on mainland U.S. food imports, whose costs were artificially inflated by the Jones Act (officially the Merchant Marine Act of 1920), which required that all goods shipped between U.S. ports be carried on U.S.-built, owned, and operated vessels. Initial colonial exploitation of Puerto Rican resources by the United States set a precedent for ongoing and aggravated conditions of poverty in the territory.

2. Poverty and Unemployment in Puerto Rico

At 43%, Puerto Rico has one of the lowest labor force participation rates in the world, according to The World Bank’s report for 2025. This is significantly lower than the United States, which the World Bank reported at 62%, and the global average of roughly 60%. According to Liberty Street Economics, the decline is “the consequence of an aging population, accelerated by a falling birth rate and outmigration of a relatively young cohort.” These vulnerabilities place considerable strain on the island’s economy, effectively limiting economic growth and increasing the likelihood that families will experience being poor in Puerto Rico.

3. Puerto Rico is the Poorest Jurisdiction of the US

Under the U.S. government’s definition of a persistently poor county as one having maintained poverty rates of 20% or more for at least 30 years, all 78 municipios (county equivalents) of Puerto Rico have experienced persistent poverty, and as The Center for Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter College has stated, have done so “for more than half a century.” Additionally, the poverty rate in Puerto Rico at 37.2% is disproportionately higher than that of even the poorest U.S. states. Mississippi, the poorest U.S. state, has a poverty rate of 14.3%, while Louisiana, the second poorest, has a rate of 14.1%. In contrast, Puerto Rico’s poverty rate is more than twice as high, demonstrating a level of economic hardship unmatched anywhere in the 50 states.

4. Cost of Living Burdens in Puerto Rico

Cost of living burdens in Puerto Rico are higher or as high as they are in U.S. states. The median household income in the United States for 2024 was $83,730, compared to $26,297 in Puerto Rico. It is important to note that this disparity does not reflect lower costs of living in Puerto Rico. The Congressional Research Service reported that, on average in the United States, 49.4% of renter households were housing cost-burdened in 2024, while in Puerto Rico, nearly 72% of renters were housing cost burdened, highlighting the substantial affordability challenges faced by many residents despite significantly lower incomes. Taken together, these figures demonstrate that Puerto Ricans often face both lower earnings and greater housing insecurity, increasing their risk of poverty.

5. Gentrification and the Displacement of Indigenous Puerto Ricans

U.S. citizens relocating to Puerto Rico has led to gentrification and the displacement of indigenous Puerto Ricans. Puerto Rico’s Act 60 (also known as the Incentives Code), which the Puerto Rican government enacted on July 1, 2019, is a comprehensive tax incentive program designed to attract investors, entrepreneurs and businesses to the island. It established a 0% tax on capital gains accrued after becoming a bona fide resident (both for Puerto Rico and U.S. federal taxes), a 100% tax exemption on dividends and interest sourced from Puerto Rico, and 75% exemption on property taxes for a primary residence. Over the combined 2022 and 2023 period, Business Insider reported that 50,577 Americans relocated to the island. This has led to significant and ongoing gentrification in the territory, along with the displacement of local Boricuas due to increasingly unaffordable housing and diminishing purchasing power.

6. Economic Development Policies in PR

The exhausted state of economic development policies in Puerto Rico has critically affected conditions of poverty. Puerto Rico’s persistently high poverty rate has also been exacerbated by the failure of existing economic development policies to generate sufficient employment opportunities. For decades, the territory relied on an export-oriented economic model supported by federal tax incentives that encouraged U.S. corporations to invest and create jobs. However, the expiration of Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code in 2006 removed many of these incentives, contributing to a prolonged economic decline from which Puerto Rico has yet to fully recover. Subsequent federal interventions, particularly the PROMESA fiscal oversight board established in 2016, imposed austerity measures that reduced public spending and disproportionately affected low-income residents. As economic growth stagnated and job creation lagged, poverty remained deeply entrenched across the island.

7. Federal Funding Parity and Political Self-Determination

Federal funding parity and political self-determination in the focus of active legislative efforts in the 119th Congress could incite positive change. Several initiatives in the 119th Congress seek to address both the structural causes and the urgent realities of being poor in Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico Nutrition Assistance Fairness Act (H.R. 5168/S. 3958) would extend SNAP benefits to the territory, reducing disparities in federal nutrition assistance and strengthening support for low-income families.

The Puerto Rico Status Act would establish a binding process for Puerto Ricans to determine the island’s future political status, potentially giving residents a stronger voice in federal decision-making and greater influence over policies affecting economic development and public welfare. Additionally, ongoing efforts to reform PROMESA seek to restore greater fiscal authority to Puerto Rico’s elected government and reduce reliance on federally imposed austerity measures. These initiatives aim to provide both immediate economic relief and greater local control over the policies that shape conditions of life in Puerto Rico.

Looking Ahead

Poverty in Puerto Rico is not the result of a single issue, but rather a combination of historical, economic and political factors that have compounded over generations. As Congress considers measures such as the Puerto Rico Nutrition Assistance Fairness Act, reforms to PROMESA and the Puerto Rico Status Act, policymakers have an opportunity to address both the immediate needs of Puerto Rican families and the structural conditions that sustain poverty. Continued advocacy and legislative action will be essential to creating a more equitable future for the island.

– Nilani Mathur

Nilani is based in Longmeadow, MA, USA and focuses on Business and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Pixabay

,

Innovations in Poverty Eradication in the Marshall Islands

Poverty Eradication in the Marshall IslandsThe Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) faces growing economic and environmental pressures, from the changing climate to food insecurity. The legacy of U.S. nuclear testing continues to affect communities, while changing weather patterns threaten the country through rising sea levels and increasingly severe weather events. Despite these obstacles, innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands are being pursued through universal basic income, food security initiatives and renewable energy investments.

Poverty in the Marshall Islands 

Poverty remains a major challenge in the Marshall Islands. Approximately 7.2% of the population lives below the national poverty line. Outmigration has increased, driven by economic hardship and climate-related pressures, and one-third of Marshallese citizens now live in the United States. According to the RMI’s 2021 census, the population declined by an average 2.3% annually over the previous decade due largely to outmigration. 

The country also faces food insecurity, wealth inequality and limited access to health care. In response, the government and its partners are developing policies aimed at improving living conditions and creating opportunities for residents to remain in the islands.

Universal Basic Income

In 2025, the Marshall Islands launched ENRA, the world’s first long-term nationwide universal basic income program. The initiative provides annual cash payments to every Marshallese citizen living in the country, helping households manage rising living costs and reducing pressure to migrate abroad. 

More than 33,000 residents enrolled in the program, making it one of the largest national outreach efforts in the country’s history. By providing a reliable source of income and building a financial safety net, ENRA seeks to strengthen economic security for families while addressing poverty at a national scale. As the world’s first nationwide long-term universal basic income program, ENRA represents one of the most significant innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands to date.

Strengthening Food Security 

Food security is another pressing concern. Arable land is limited, much of the natural environment has been damaged by nuclear testing and more than half of households reported that natural disasters had limited their livelihoods in the most recent census. The national diet relies heavily on imported, highly processed foods, with an estimated 80% to 90% of the country’s food supply coming from abroad.

To address this dependence, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), with support from the Government of Japan, launched a two-year initiative in 2026 to strengthen local food systems on Majuro and Wotje atolls. The project supports school gardens, nutrition education and improved food storage while promoting greater use of locally produced foods and fisheries. Efforts to strengthen local food production are another example of innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands, addressing both nutrition and economic resilience.

Renewable Energy for Economic Resilience

Innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands also take the form of renewable energy. Although the country achieved universal access to electricity in 2022, it remains heavily dependent on imported diesel fuel, which contributes to high energy costs. 

To reduce this dependence, the RMI has partnered with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the World Bank to expand solar power, modernize electricity infrastructure and improve energy storage systems. These investments are expected to lower energy costs, strengthen energy security and increase resilience to climate-related disruptions. 

In low-lying nations like the RMI, extreme weather is a key driver of poverty. An estimated 1.7% of RMI GDP is lost annually to typhoons and tsunamis. Through the Pacific Resilience Project II, supported by the Green Climate Fund and the World Bank, the Marshall Islands is improving coastal protection, disaster preparedness and early warning systems. These measures help reduce the economic losses caused by extreme weather events, which can undermine development progress and deepen poverty.

Looking Ahead 

Innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands demonstrate how even small island nations can develop ambitious solutions to complex challenges. While the changing climate, geographic isolation and economic vulnerability remain significant obstacles, innovations in poverty eradication in the Marshall Islands, such as investments in income security, local food production and renewable energy, are helping build long-term resilience. These efforts offer a model for how targeted policies can reduce poverty while preparing communities for an uncertain future.

– Anna Morin

Anna is based in Fairfield, CT, USA and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Urban Food Poverty in India: Delhi’s 3 a.m. Kitchen

Urban Food Poverty India: Delhi's 3 a.m. Kitchen Every morning, before most of Delhi has opened its eyes, a kitchen in Connaught Place is already running at full speed. Thousands of meal boxes — roti, kadhi chawal, rajma, vegetable noodles — are packed and loaded into a van before 9 a.m. By the time the city’s traffic begins to snarl, Atul Kapur’s team is already on the road.

Kapur is not a celebrity chef. He is a Delhi restaurateur, co-owner of the Q’BA restaurant in Connaught Place, who looked at the hunger around him and decided his kitchen could do more. In 2016, he co-founded Rasoi on Wheels — a mobile kitchen that now distributes thousands of freshly cooked meals every week to homeless individuals, slum schools and daily wage workers across Delhi-NCR. The meals are not leftovers.

A City Sitting on Top of a Hunger Crisis

Delhi’s contradictions are visible from any street corner. Gleaming malls stand minutes from settlements where families cannot guarantee a single meal a day. India ranks 102 out of 123 countries on the 2024 Global Hunger Index, with a hunger level classified as “serious.”

Nationally, an estimated 811 million people remain undernourished — the largest such population in the world. In Delhi’s urban slums specifically, a Tata-Cornell Institute study found that 51% of households experienced food insecurity. India produces enough food to feed itself. The crisis is not one of supply — it is one of access, distribution and dignity.

Ghar Jaisa Khana: Food Like Home

Rasoi on Wheels started by serving 30 meals a day. That grew to 300, then to 800 to 1,000 meals five days a week, plus Sunday langars for the homeless.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, with Delhi’s migrant workers stranded, the organization distributed close to 20,000 meals a day.

The operation’s tagline is ghar jaisa khana — food like home. It is a deliberate choice. The people served are not handed scraps. They receive a rotating daily menu, individually packaged and prepared fresh from 3 a.m. every morning. Kapur calls the funding model ISR — Individual Social Responsibility — donations from ordinary people marking birthdays, weddings and funerals by feeding strangers instead.

Kapur has said that food is the most important requirement and that people should not be deprived of healthy food simply because they cannot afford it.

A Global Movement, One Kitchen at a Time

Kapur’s model sits within a broader shift in how food professionals are responding to hunger. Globally, José Andrés’ World Central Kitchen has served hundreds of millions of meals across crisis zones, built on the same core principle: that trained cooks, given the right support, can respond to hunger faster and more humanely than most institutions. In 2024 alone, World Central Kitchen served more than 109 million meals across 20 countries.

Both operations reject the model of surplus redistribution — the cold, leftover approach to aid — in favor of treating hungry people as people who deserve a proper meal.

What Policy Can Learn From a Van

Rasoi on Wheels is not a comprehensive solution to Delhi’s hunger crisis. But it points to something that policy consistently underestimates — the capacity of local, sustained, community-rooted action to fill gaps that government programs leave open.

India’s Public Distribution System, designed to provide subsidized food grains to the poor, reaches millions. But it does not reach the homeless man sleeping under a bridge in Connaught Place, or the construction worker’s child who arrives at school too hungry to learn. Rasoi on Wheels does.

Looking Ahead

Urban food poverty in India remains a structural challenge that no single organization can solve. The work of Rasoi on Wheels demonstrates that locally rooted, dignity-centered food initiatives can reach populations that formal systems miss. As India continues to grapple with the gap between food production and food access, models like this offer practical evidence that sustained, community-driven action can complement broader policy efforts to reduce hunger and poverty.

– Parthive Mukherji

Parthive is based in Edinburgh, UK and focuses on Celebs and World News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

,

Updates on SDG 1 in Singapore 

SDG 1 in SingaporeThough Singapore boasts one of the highest GDPs per capita globally, government disbursements of $600 SGD in relief aid to millions of Singaporeans reveal the persistence of a lesser-seen reality: affluence does not immunize wealthy societies against poverty. The latest updates on SDG 1 in Singapore show that the PAP’s poverty reduction efforts have evolved beyond simple cash handouts to include community-led food security programs and wage policy adjustments, pointing to the country’s changing approach to poverty alleviation.

Poverty in Singapore

Singapore does not publish an official poverty line, making the full scale of hardship difficult to measure, but tracking updates on SDG 1 in Singapore requires understanding who poverty actually affects. A 2024 UN Food and Agriculture Organization report estimated that 7.7% of Singapore’s population experienced moderate to severe food insecurity as of 2022, a rate that has tripled since 2014. The Singapore Hunger Report found that 10% of households experienced food insecurity in the past year, with 79% citing financial constraints. Poverty concentrates among elderly residents in public rental flats, low-wage workers, and households with dependents, who face compounding health challenges and a disproportionately higher inflation burden than wealthier households.

Singapore’s Multi-Pronged Approach to Poverty Reduction

The Singapore government has adopted a strategy combining direct financial support with grassroots food security initiatives, recognizing the persistence of relative poverty among seniors, low-wage workers and households with dependents.

The Ministry of Finance announced in December 2025 that approximately 3 million adult Singaporeans received Assurance Package cash payments ranging from $100 SGD to $600 SGD. Eligibility depends on assessable income and property ownership. Citizens earning up to $39,000 with no more than one property received the maximum payout.

In February 2026, Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong unveiled additional cost-of-living measures under Budget 2026. All Singaporean households will receive a one-time cost-of-living special payment of $500 SGD in CDC vouchers in January 2027 to help with daily living costs such as groceries and gas. Additionally, a one-time cost-of-living special payment ranging from $200 SGD to $400 SGD will go to adult citizens earning up to $100,000 SGD who own no more than one property. Yet, Wong emphasized that 95% of the budget goes to long-term structural plans, with only 5% for one-time assistance, prioritizing sustainable wage growth as the truly durable solution to poverty.

Effective 2027, the local qualifying salary for companies employing foreign workers will also rise to $1,800 SGD from $1,600 SGD to prevent wage suppression by supporting decent work, a framework the United Nations links directly to poverty reduction under SDG 1.

Community Gardens Address Food Security

A more obscure but rapidly growing solution to poverty reduction involves edible gardens that feed vulnerable populations while building social connection, known as the Healthy Harvest Initiative. Launched in October 2025 through a partnership between Prudential Singapore and the SG Eco Fund under the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, the initiative aims to collect 6,000 kilograms of food waste for composting and distribute 3,000 kilograms of fresh vegetables to the community. Two wheelchair-accessible edible gardens totaling 235 square meters in Telok Blangah and West Coast Park make it easier for seniors and persons with disabilities to volunteer and grow fresh produce. For low-income residents who receive the harvested produce, the gardens provide reliable access to nutritious food. For the volunteers, the gardens offer purpose and social contact, addressing the social isolation that often accompanies poverty in older adults.

Six months later, Naval Base Primary School launched a refreshed Wellness Garden with solar-powered hydroponics as part of Go Green SG 2026. Harvested produce flows to community fridges through a network of volunteers, while simultaneously providing hands-on educational experience to Singaporean children.

Small Initiatives Gain Traction for Future Impact

Three smaller-scale programs have received little national attention but are now building momentum. First, the Singapore Food Agency replaced its widely publicized 30 by 30 goal in November 2025 with more targeted production targets. Local farms now aim to meet 20% of fiber needs by 2035 and supply approximately one-third of protein needs by the same year. While this shift received criticism from some environmental groups, it allows local farmers to focus on crops that directly benefit low-income households.

Second, Singapore’s Platform Workers Act, which came into force in January 2025, created a distinct legal category for gig economy workers — including delivery riders and private-hire drivers — who are neither traditional employees nor self-employed. The Act mandates gradual increases in CPF contributions for platform workers over five years, improving their housing and retirement security. The government has also introduced the Platform Workers CPF Transition Support scheme to offset increased contribution costs for lower-income workers during the transition period.

Third, community fridge networks have formalized under the SG Cares framework. Fourteen community fridges now operate across Singapore, restocked regularly by volunteers and local businesses. Unlike government food rations, community fridges allow residents to choose what they need without paperwork or stigma, serving vulnerable groups across the island.

These three initiatives reflect the broader updates on SDG 1 in Singapore, focusing on poverty reduction at the neighborhood level, where poverty often hides behind the PAP’s robust subsidized housing (HDB) program, and treat it not as a failure of individual effort but as a gap in systems necessitating a humane design for repair.

– Estelle Anais Aubry

Estelle is based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada and focuses on Global Health and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Unsplash

, ,

From Crisis to Resilience: Food Security in Nicaragua

Food Security in NicaraguaFood security in Nicaragua remains a persistent challenge in rural areas where families depend heavily on agriculture for both income and daily food. According to the World Food Program (WFP), about 19% of people are undernourished, and rural households are most affected during drought and flooding cycles. These conditions continue to strain food systems, but local and international efforts work to improve stability over time.

Agriculture’s Role in Food Security

Agriculture is central to food security in Nicaragua, especially in rural regions where smallholder farmers grow staple crops such as beans, corn and rice. The World Bank reports that climate change has increased the frequency of droughts and the intensity of flooding in areas such as the Dry Corridor, directly impacting crop yields and household incomes. When harvests fail, families lose both their food supply and financial stability.

Farmers adopt strategies that support long-term food security in Nicaragua. These include crop diversification, soil conservation methods and drought-resistant seeds. In some communities, farmers also use small-scale irrigation systems and rainwater harvesting to reduce dependence on rainfall. These changes help reduce risk in regions where weather patterns have become less predictable.

Current Responses:

  • Systems-based Responses: One example of a systems-based response is the WFP school feeding program, which reaches more than 140,000 children in Nicaragua. These meals address immediate nutrition needs while also creating demand for local food production, since smallholder farmers often supply part of the food used in the program. This strengthens food security in Nicaragua by linking agricultural production with consistent institutional demand.
  • Community-based Solutions: Community-based solutions also contribute to progress. Agricultural cooperatives allow farmers to share tools, training and market access, reducing production costs and improving stability during poor harvest seasons. Community gardens provide households with direct access to fresh food and reduce dependence on markets affected by price shifts and supply disruptions. These efforts strengthen household food security in Nicaragua.
  • Strengthening Smallholder Systems: According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) analysis of rural livelihoods, smallholder farming systems account for the majority of agricultural production in Nicaragua and are central to rural food access. Strengthening these systems through training and access to resources has been identified as one of the most effective ways to improve resilience in food-insecure regions.

Continued Efforts Needed

While challenges remain, progress is being made through combined local and international efforts. Strengthening food security in Nicaragua depends on continued investment in rural communities, climate-resilient farming tools and programs that connect local production with stable food systems. Evidence from ongoing initiatives shows that food insecurity can be reduced through coordinated long-term action.

– Suheiry Frayre

Suheiry is based in Los Angeles, CA, USA and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

US Funding to Alleviate Poverty in Sudan and Afghanistan

Poverty in SudanOn May 14, 2026, the United States (U.S.) contributed $1.8 billion in funding to the United Nations (U.N.) to assist in its humanitarian aid efforts worldwide. According to the U.S. State Department, these funds will be mainly allocated toward those struggling from famine and natural disasters. This funding increase, along with the $2 billion the U.S. contributed in December 2025, will support local projects that assist the most vulnerable in 21 countries. Importantly, the increased funding will also help address ongoing challenges of famine and health care in Sudan and Afghanistan, both of which require more support to alleviate rising poverty rates.

Current Situation in Sudan and Afghanistan

In recent weeks, the U.N. has publicly called for more countries to contribute funding for Sudan and Afghanistan. On May 15, 2026, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) issued a report stating that 19.5 million people in Sudan, or 41% of the population, are struggling with high levels of food insecurity, including an estimated 825,000 children under 5 suffering from severe acute malnutrition. According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), approximately 28 million people in Afghanistan were living in poverty in 2025, a figure that has changed little in 2026. These individuals are struggling to afford food, housing and health care due to economic hardships. However, increased U.S. funding enables U.N. agencies to address these issues more effectively.

Ongoing Aid Projects in Sudan

The increased funding from the U.S. will help strengthen ongoing aid projects in Sudan that tackle issues related to poverty. For example, as of May 2026, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) runs the SANAD program, which has assisted over 182,000 household members in Sudan by providing them access to cash support and essential health care services. Additionally, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) in Sudan operates a Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) program that works to upgrade the water and sanitation infrastructure and distribute hygiene and cholera kits to prevent the spread of diseases and infections. Increased funding to the UN will enhance these programs that are already saving lives and will eventually contribute to ending the conflict in Sudan.

Basic Human Needs Programs in Afghanistan

The UN is currently running basic human needs programs (BHN) in Afghanistan that provide vulnerable communities access to essential services that can improve their quality of life. In 2025, BHN programs provided access to health care services to more than 34 million people struggling with urgent health conditions. Furthermore, the BHN programs have helped 4.6 million children deprived of schooling gain access to education. Since 2025, the World Food Programme (WFP) has been providing food rations and nutrition assistance to more than 12.4 million people in Afghanistan. Thus, the increased funding from the U.S. to the U.N. will empower its aid agencies to reach more vulnerable people in Afghanistan who urgently need food, health care and education.

Hope for the Most Vulnerable

The increased funding from the U.S. to the U.N. results from the passionate advocacy of the U.N. and its local partner organizations for vulnerable communities in Sudan and Afghanistan. In Sudan, the U.N. and the IRC have raised awareness of the millions who have accessed essential health care services, clean water, and food, as well as the millions still living in poverty. In Afghanistan, the U.N. and the WFP have highlighted the millions of children who have finally accessed education and nutrition assistance, while emphasizing that the work is far from over. This advocacy means millions of vulnerable women and children will now be able to study and eat healthy food, eventually leading to a higher quality of life for everyone.

– Abdullah Dowaihy

Abdullah is based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and focuses on Good News and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Vertical Agriculture and Food Security in Saudi Arabia

Food Security in Saudi ArabiaAgainst the hyper-arid backdrop of the Arabian Peninsula, standard farming has historically been a losing battle against nature. Importing more than 80% of its food, the region has long been vulnerable to international supply chain shocks and volatile global market prices. The World Health Organization (WHO) previously projected that half of the global population would reside in water-stressed regions; currently, that milestone has become a stark reality as localized water demands consistently outstrip available supplies.

A major technological breakthrough is shifting the paradigm by combining two things the Arab Peninsula has an ample supply of; seawater and sunlight. A new method of desalination is allowing completely solar-powered greenhouses to operate using saltwater piped directly from the sea into wells, creating ideal growing conditions. The innovation was adopted over the last decade in sun-coated countries like Oman and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The technology draws inspiration from ancient architectural designs built for extreme heat. Traditional palaces in Persia, for example, integrated cascading wall fountains and courtyard pools to harness evaporative cooling, effectively creating a primitive, self-sustaining air conditioning system.

What is Vertical Agriculture?

To address mounting agricultural threats, Dickson Despommier, an American professor of public and environmental health, introduced the concept of the vertical farm in 1999. A method that optimizes food production by cultivating crops in vertically stacked layers within strictly controlled indoor environments. Because these systems are completely enclosed, they can thrive in any geographic location, spanning from dense city centers to arid, scorching deserts.

While standard vertical farms rely heavily on municipal fresh water, a groundbreaking twist on this design uses the ocean to fuel production. Rather than needing expensive, energy-intensive air conditioning to shield crops from desert heat, specialized facilities trickle raw seawater down porous cooling pads. As hot desert winds pass through the moisture, evaporation cools the interior air by up to 15 degrees Celsius.

Additionally, the moisture-laden air condenses against cold water pipes, creating a constant internal supply of pure freshwater drops that hydrate the vertically stacked plants. According to global infrastructure reports by corporations like Mitsui, scaling these closed-loop ecosystems allows arid nations to generate massive agricultural yields using zero net freshwater.

What Does This Mean for Food Security in Saudi Arabia?

With a landscape that is 95% desert and a population approaching 37 million people, Saudi Arabia faces a critical ecological challenge as it relies on diminishing groundwater reserves that cannot be replenished. Vision 2030 is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s strategic blueprint for economic diversification and long-term environmental sustainability. As the country faces extreme water stress, the initiative heavily prioritizes water resource protection by cutting down on the depletion of natural aquifers.

With vertical agriculture in Saudi Arabia, the government aims to dramatically improve water efficiency by integrating a “circular economy” model that scales up wastewater recycling, implements smart irrigation technologies, and mandates clean, eco-friendly food production systems like vertical farming. By transitioning away from traditional open-field flood irrigation in Saudi, the expansion of vertical farming and high-tech hydroponic systems delivers up to 95% water savings while enabling reliable, year-round yields without pesticide reliance.

How is it Being Implemented?

According to analysis by PwC Middle East, Saudi Arabia has accelerated the adoption of these modern greenhouse solutions through multi-billion Riyal investment plans managed over the past few years. A prominent real-world deployment for vertical agriculture in Saudi Arabia is taking place at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). Located on the shores of the Red Sea, it has served as the primary testing ground for spin-out enterprises like Red Sea Farms. Additionally, Red Sea Global (RSG) – the massive state-backed developer behind the region’s regenerative tourism destinations – has integrated these saltwater-cooled, indoor agricultural networks directly into its food development zones. Strategically placing these commercial facilities along the coast allows them to draw directly from an infinite marine supply, proving that hyper-arid desert terrain can be transformed into localized, climate-resilient food centers without placing any pressure on inland freshwater resources.

Looking Ahead

Ultimately, this agricultural evolution represents a vital structural shift toward self-sufficiency and food security in Saudi Arabia. As international partners continue to invest in climate-resilient food infrastructure, the lessons learned on the Red Sea coast will provide blueprints for other drought-prone nations across East Africa and the Middle East. The scaling of vertical agriculture in Saudi Arabia stands as a powerful testament to how creative engineering can safeguard human livelihoods, protect precious natural resources and pave a sustainable path toward resource-independent food security.

– Celine Dib

Celine is based in London and focuses on Good News and Technology for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Updates on SDG 1 in Venezuela

SDG 1 in VenezuelaPoverty remains one of the most urgent challenges in Venezuela, making updates on SDG 1 in Venezuela an important topic to examine. Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1) calls for ending poverty in all its forms, expanding social protection and reducing the vulnerability of people facing economic and social shocks. In Venezuela, that goal remains difficult to achieve. While some indicators suggest limited improvement in monetary poverty, recent evidence shows that many families still struggle with food insecurity, low purchasing power and barriers to basic services.

What SDG 1 Means for Venezuela

SDG 1 is broader than income alone. The goal includes reducing poverty according to national definitions, strengthening social protection systems and helping vulnerable populations gain access to essential services. In Venezuela, this matters because poverty is not only expressed through low wages or unstable income. It is also reflected in whether families can afford food, whether children can remain in school and whether households can meet basic needs with dignity.

That distinction is especially important in the Venezuelan case. A household may experience a small increase in income and still remain in a deeply precarious situation if access to health care, education and adequate nutrition continues to lag. For that reason, updates on SDG 1 in Venezuela must be understood through a multidimensional lens rather than through income data alone. UNICEF’s Venezuela social protection program links poverty directly to family income, unmet needs and structural inequality.

What Recent Data Shows

Recent data presents a mixed picture. According to ENCOVI 2024, Venezuela’s economic reactivation has contributed to a decrease in monetary poverty. However, the same report states that these changes have had only a limited impact on improvements in access to education and health care, where significant deficits remain. This means that while some households may be earning slightly more, broader living conditions have not improved at the same pace.

International SDG tracking also reflects these limits. The Sustainable Development Report 2025 gives Venezuela an SDG Index score of 63.8 and ranks it 115th out of 167 countries. The profile also notes that Venezuela completed one Voluntary National Review between 2016 and 2025. This suggests that overall progress toward SDG goals, including SDG 1, remains limited.

Social Protection and Humanitarian Support in Venezuela

Despite these challenges, there are still efforts underway that connect directly to SDG 1. UNICEF Venezuela states that its main objective in social protection is to ensure that children and adolescents have access to inclusive social protection and live free of poverty.

UNICEF implements programs such as:

  • Multipurpose Cash Transfers, which provide families with direct financial support to cover essential needs such as food, hygiene products and medicines.
  • Child Nutrition Programs, which deliver nutritional supplements in schools and community centers to support children’s development.
  • Institutional Strengthening, which helps improve poverty measurement and technical capacity for public policies aimed at reducing inequality.

These programs have reached thousands of vulnerable families and contributed to increased food security and household stability.

Humanitarian assistance also remains essential. The World Food Programme (WFP) began implementing its school meals program in Venezuela in 2021. According to WFP, 5.1 million people in Venezuela urgently require food assistance, and the agency reached 750,000 people in 2025. Its school meals program supports more than 330,000 people across more than 1,100 schools, helping reduce pressure on vulnerable households and improve child nutrition.

Why Progress on SDG 1 Remains Uneven

Even with these efforts, progress on SDG 1 in Venezuela remains uneven. ENCOVI 2024 makes clear that improvements in monetary poverty have not translated into equally strong advances in education and health. UNICEF also notes that low household income and unmet basic needs continue to limit long-term progress. This shows that poverty in Venezuela remains both economic and structural.

Recent 2026 reporting reinforces this fragility. Reuters reported that the IMF described Venezuela’s situation as “quite fragile,” citing inflation, currency depreciation, and persistent inequality. Additional reports indicate that rising oil prices may improve national revenue but can also increase food and fuel costs, placing further pressure on low-income households.

The Road Ahead for SDG 1 in Venezuela

The future of updates on SDG 1 in Venezuela depends on whether the country can move from short-term relief toward broader stability and inclusion. Better poverty measurement, stronger social protection and sustained humanitarian assistance remain essential. Organizations such as UNICEF and WFP demonstrate that practical support is possible even in difficult conditions.

Venezuela remains far from achieving SDG 1, but the country’s situation also highlights why the goal matters. Poverty is not only about income. It is connected to food security, education, health and the ability of families to live with dignity. Understanding these factors is key to building more effective responses and moving toward long-term poverty reduction.

– Adriana Carolina Herrera

Adriana is based in Mentor, Ohio, USA and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons