, ,

From 60% to 30%: Inside Rwanda’s Poverty Reduction Miracle

From 60% to 30%: Inside Rwanda’s Poverty Reduction Miracle Rwanda, a country in central Africa, has transformed its image from one linked to genocide to a model of development. Over the past generation, it has reduced its extreme poverty rate from 60.3% in 2000 to under 40% in 2017, earning recognition for its poverty alleviation, often called the “Rwandan Miracle.”

A Country Rising from the Ruins

In 1994, Rwanda experienced one of the fastest and most horrific genocides in history, resulting in around 800,000 to 1 million Tutsis and moderate Hutus murdered in just 100 days. When the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) finally ended the genocide and established a government in July 1994, this marked the beginning of Rwanda’s poverty reduction miracle. 

By the year 2000, six years after the genocide, Rwanda continued to be one of the world’s poorest nations. Life expectancy was about 48/49 years, child mortality rates ranked among the highest internationally and 60% of the population survived on less than the international poverty line of $1.90 per day. The country faced significant challenges, such as limited natural resources, high population density, landlocked geography and profound trauma.

Vision 2020: Planning for Transformation

Under President Paul Kagame, Rwanda’s leadership embarked on an ambitious development agenda. In 2000, the government launched Vision 2020, aiming to transform Rwanda into a middle-income country by 2020 to reduce poverty from 60% to 30%. It focused on poverty reduction and established specific programs as the backbone of Rwanda’s poverty reduction miracle transformation:

The Ubudehe System: Target Poverty Identification

Rwanda’s poverty reduction miracle strategy relies on the innovative Ubudehe system. This community-based approach involves identifying and categorising households according to their socioeconomic status. By utilising traditional Rwandan practices of collective action, the system sorts each household into one of four economic categories. This classification enables tailored interventions that effectively address the needs of different families. 

Vision 2020 Umurenge Programme (VUP)

Initiated in 2008, the VUP has served as Rwanda’s key initiative for reducing poverty, functioning through three key components: 

  • Public Works: Offering paid work on community infrastructure projects for capable adults from underprivileged backgrounds in households.
  • Direct support: Cash transfers provided unconditionally to the most vulnerable households lacking labour capacity.
  • Financial Services: Providing access to credit and financial support to empower underprivileged families and helping them gain the knowledge and resources they need to improve their financial situations and achieve greater economic stability.

According to the World Bank, VUP beneficiaries in these programs increased from 19% in March 2020 to 41.5% by December 2021. This project addresses childhood malnutrition in Rwanda through safety nets that enhance nutrition and early childhood development. The Nutrition Sensitive Direct Support (NSDS) has helped more than 200,000 households, exceeding the target of 59,000 and covering 96% of eligible families in 18 districts. 

Girinka: One Cow per Poor Family

Rwanda’s notable poverty initiative, Girinka, supplies dairy cows to impoverished families. From 2006 to the end of June 2022, it has provided 427,576 cows to 427,576 families, an 84.7% accomplishment that accounts for the programme’s goal. Research indicates that Girinka participants experienced increased household income and enhancements in child nutrition.

Universal Health Coverage as Poverty Prevention

Rwanda acknowledges that health shocks cause poverty. To address this, the country created a Community-Based Health Insurance scheme (Mutuelles de Santé), enabling citizens to pool funds and receive donations for health care costs. Each member contributes 1,000 Rwanda Francs ($2).  

The program fully subsidised premiums and copayments for 1.5 million of the poorest residents in 2011 to improve affordability. Consequently, more than 90% of Rwandans had health insurance by 2020, compared to an average of 31% in other low-income countries. This coverage significantly increased life expectancy in Rwanda from 49.7 years in 2001 to 69.6 years in 2022, enabling the government to tackle critical health challenges. Rwanda is the only low-income country in Sub-Saharan Africa to meet the United Nations (U.N.) Millennium Development Goals on maternal mortality and infectious diseases.

Agricultural Transformation and Rural Development

Agriculture is vital for Rwanda’s poverty reduction miracle, lifting 1 million citizens from extreme poverty in the past decade through improved practices backed by the International Development Association (IDA). The sector contributes 33% to GDP, employs 79.5% of the workforce and accounts for more than 45% of exports. Food security improved in 200 with food production and a 30% income increase for some farmers. Between 2006 and 2011, extreme poverty fell by 14 percentage points, due to rising productivity and a shift to commercial farming.

The Results: From 60% to Below 30% Vision

The interventions implemented in Rwanda’s poverty reduction miracle have significantly transformed Rwanda’s socio-economic landscape. Notably, extreme poverty has dramatically declined from more than 60% in 2000 to 39.1% in recent years. Life expectancy has improved considerably, increasing from 46 years in 2000 to 65 years in 2023. Moreover, child mortality rates have fallen by 70%. Unconditional cash transfer aids 112,000 households across 416 sectors, 73% of which are women-led. Nutrition support is provided for 131,000 children under 2 and 40,000 pregnant women.

– Vanuza Antonio

Vanuza is based in London, UK and focuses on Good News and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

E3 Nations and humanitarian aid to Gaza

humanitarian aid gazaThe Gaza Strip has witnessed untold destruction and has suffered tens of thousands of deaths. Humanitarian aid is desperately necessary in this region. The E3 nations (United Kingdom (U.K.), France and Germany) pledged much-needed humanitarian aid to Gaza on March 5, 2025, hoping to mobilize a peace accord in the region but also to ensure the aid provided gets to where it is needed. The U.K. Government stated that sustaining a ceasefire is vital alongside the continued humanitarian flow. The E3 nations involved have disapproved of Israel’s cut-off of any humanitarian aid to Gaza on March 2, 2025, violating multiple human rights codes. All E3 nations further stated that “bloodshed is in no one’s interest” in achieving access to humanitarian aid, wanting more peaceful means.

Humanitarian Aid from the UK

The U.K. has made large strides in providing humanitarian aid to Gaza. Working alongside UNICEF, the World Food Program (WFP) and the Egyptian Red Crescent Society (ERCS), the U.K. has helped combat shortages of food, water and medical supplies. Official Development Assistance (ODA) of £27 million went to the Palestinian Territories to further allow access to resources. An additional £4.25 million went to vulnerable children and young women through a partnership with UNFPA, which estimates it could reach one-fifth of Gazan women and children.

At home, the U.K.’s Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO) and Ministry of Defence (MOD) have helped supply humanitarian aid to Gaza. More than £100 million went for ensuring humanitarian aid reaches the proper channels in Gaza to relieve it.

Humanitarian Aid from Germany

Since October 2023, “German assistance for the Palestinian territories has been increased by more than €300 million” to help alleviate the wartime crisis. Germany has fortunately seen its efforts come to fruition through its generous aid programs. Through its joint partnerships with UNICEF and the WFP, Germany has helped provide Gazans with much-needed supplies of nutrients and food formulas to combat malnutrition.

In addition to its physical efforts, Germany, as an E3 nation, has made clear statements on the need to help Gaza in its time of need, as well as to help end the humanitarian horrors by bringing peace to the region. “No humanitarian aid has reached Gaza for a month,” said German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. “This cannot and must not continue,” he added.

Humanitarian Aid from France

French President Emmanuel Macron said, “Aid must never be used as a tool of war,” on April 9, 2025. France, alongside the E3 nations, has put forward a strong position on supplying humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza. On February 14, 2025, France sent 52 tons of humanitarian aid to Gaza, hoping to help more than 1,000 families with blankets, ground sheets, medicine, food and water. Additionally, France has worked alongside its local NGOs to ensure that the people in need directly receive the aid. Working with Premiere Urgence Internationale and Médecins du Monde have helped give the supplies from the French government to Gaza through the Jordanian humanitarian corridor.

Financially, France has made considerable contributions to the cause. Attending the first international conference of Gaza’s civilian population, France contributed €100 million out of €1 billion raised for the conference.

Outcomes

The E3 nations and the humanitarian aid provided have been significant since October 7, 2023. All three nations have contributed with both financial and physical aid, food and medicine. The E3 nations have contributed more than most to the humane cause of helping people in war torn societies.

– Joel Raymer

Joel  is based in Derby, Derbyshire, UK and focuses on Business and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

,

The Rebuilding of Eastern Ghouta

eastern ghoutaEastern Ghouta, a region in Syria previously bombarded with attacks from Syrian Government forces, has finally become accessible for humanitarian aid and support groups following the collapse of the Assad Regime in December 2024. While there is still quite a way to go, several key organizations have proven hugely significant for the reconstruction initiatives within the area that focus not only on aid for civilians but also the surrounding infrastructure and agriculture.

Syrian Civil War

The Syrian Revolution in March 2011 involved large-scale protests across the country, fuelled by popular discontent for the Assad regime. Bashar al-Assad took power in 2000 after his father, Hafez al-Assad, died, and promised to bring a new era of rule to Syria, modernizing the economy and “launching [their] own democratic experience.” However, modernization came at the cost of the well-being of the population. While he promised to move away from the “Arab socialism” that had previously defined the Ba’athist regime, favoring a market-controlled rather than state-controlled economy, it remained that it only benefited the well-connected few.

Separation and privatization to dismantle ubiquitous state rule was done through the deregulation of economic activity rather than the outright sale of public sector enterprises, causing greater instability in pricing and market values that motivated many new private investments into the economy. It was this private sector stimulation that ultimately resulted in the “mushrooming” of private sectors in Syria, such as healthcare, education and banking. State-regulated price ceilings and subsidies gradually phased out, and social stratification became increasingly prevalent as public sector employment shrunk while the cost of living rose exponentially.

Following a drought from 2006 to 2010, socioeconomic inequality hit a record high. The rural population, unable to make a living from unusable farmland, migrated to cities and caused the unemployment rate to soar further.Popular discontent was at its peak, and with the wider Arabian population partaking in the uprising Arab Spring movement, Syria too was inspired and formally began their protests in March 2011.

The Conflict

The Syrian civil war, up until the collapse of the regime, was a complicated conflict with many different sides and proxies operating on different axes that did not only focus on government supporters and opposition. However, the conflict can ultimately be broken down into three sects: the Syrian rebels (and their backers Turkey, Gulf Arab states, the US and Jordan), the Syrian Government (and their backers Russia, Iran, Hezbollah and Shia Muslim militias) and ISIS/ISIL. The rebels and Syrian Government forces fought each other, however, both sides also fought ISIS, who used the conflict to justify the expansion of their territory to create a singular caliphate state across the wider Islamic region.

Eastern Ghouta Region

At the turn of the revolution, Syrian rebel forces quickly set up strongholds in major regions across Syria, with Eastern Ghouta becoming one in November 2012. Because of its proximity to the capital city Damascus, Eastern Ghouta was a hugely geographically significant and advantageous position for the rebels and remained one of the last rebel strongholds until 2018, when Syrian Government forces reclaimed the area.

Eastern Ghouta was bombarded with numerous forms of attack throughout its time as a rebel-occupied area. In the early hours of August 21, 2013, it witnessed a chemical weapons attack, specifically a nerve agent called Sarin, that, along with Western Ghouta, resulting in 1,017 deaths, 989 of which were civilians, out of which 308 were women and 122 children.

In the final weeks before the government recaptured the region, the offensive claimed the lives of 1,473 civilians, including 301 children and 185 women. This “all-out campaign,” with the support of Russia, was the final attack that caused the stronghold to collapse, with evacuations taking place throughout March 2018 until April 12, when the Syrian Government declared the control of the area.

MSF Providing Support

Following the collapse of the Assad regime, humanitarian groups have been working relentlessly to restore the region, providing numerous grants to support the rebuilding of the necessary infrastructure. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is one of the humanitarian groups that has been working particularly closely with the region since the beginning of the conflict, where initially only remote support could be provided due to being denied onsite access to the region by government forces. Following a visit in February 2025, the region “shows little signs of normalcy [and] Eastern Ghouta’s suffering is far from over” and needs urgent support now. However, the organization is making significant progress, operating mobile clinics to tend to basic healthcare needs, consultations, and mental health support and, as of February 2025, has tended to 576 patients, including 77 children under 5 years old.

MSF calls the time “a new chapter of hope” as several of its teams operate both in the Eastern Ghouta region and further afield across Syria to ensure the people gain the healthcare needed. During the Syrian Civil War, MSF originally remotely supported 20 clinics operating in the region. However, as the conflict progressed, this reduced to none either due to abandonment or former government forces taking over the area. Now that the mobile clinics have returned to operation, there seems to be a rekindled sense of life and relief to the people of Eastern Ghouta; “despite what they have seen, people are still able to smile,” said Bilal Alsarakibi, MSF’s medical adviser.

Danish Refugee Council

On the infrastructure side of the reconstruction efforts, the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) grants have proved hugely significant. The conflict caused severe physical damage, such as once fertile fields left dry and barren and water wells broken and contaminated. However, the DRC tells the story of a Syrian man named Samer who took to reviving the greenery of the region and bringing it back to its former beauty: “I want the next generation to grow surrounded by greenery, not the crisis’ leftovers.”

As part of the larger Syrian Resilience Consortium (SRC), the DRC provided grants to build water collection pools and install solar panels, allowing for both agricultural and electricity sustainable practices to take shape in the area. Furthermore, multiple donors within the DRC have supported the Multi-Purpose Cash Assistance (MPCA) program to provide financial support to families in need in the area.

Closing Remarks

While the Assad Regime may have fallen, hardship is still far from over in Syria. Such is the religious and territorial diversity in the country, appointing new leadership for the long term could inevitably cause some tension. However, with the support of humanitarian groups and foreign aid grants gradually uplifting the spirit of the people can be a success story. This is undoubtedly one of the most important objectives in Syria to ensure a community that can come together to grow from their long history of conflict and welcome a new era not only politically, but also socially and economically.

– Helena Pryce

Helena is based in Nottingham, UK and focuses on Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

VSLAs: CARE Continues to Tackle Global Poverty

VSLAsFounded in 1945 after WWII, the Cooperative for American Remittances to Europe (CARE) foundation is one of the oldest organizations focusing on humanitarian relief and global aid. Dr. Lincoln Clark approached 22 American charities to create CARE and deliver immediate relief to those in need in the form of a CARE package. Over the past 80 years, the main priorities have spread to crisis relief, food and water, health, education and work, and empowering young women and girls in over 120 countries. Indeed, CARE’s main goal is to provide “humanitarian assistance to 10% of those affected in major crises, reaching at least 50 million people by 2030.”

Gender Barriers and Financial Inclusion

Using the Women’s Economic Justice (WEJ) programs, CARE creates transformative solutions to address systemic gender barriers. Women in these countries face exclusion from financial services, unequal pay and burdensome unpaid care work. However, CARE recognizes the impact that women could have on the economy, predicting that an additional $10 trillion could go to global GDP once gender gaps are over.

The WEJ program strategies include the Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs), which operate at the community level to bring primarily women together and form savings groups. This entails engaging in financial literacy training, pooling resources and accessing low-risk loans. CARE’s initiative focuses on long-term change by incorporating market access programs, private sector partnerships and policy advocacy with local market actors.

VSLAs are a 12-year initiative formed in 2018 to help 65 million people overall. This works to ensure positive impacts on the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals regarding decent work and economic growth, gender equality and sustainable communities.

CARE Fighting Violence

One of the programs built into VSLAs is incorporating men and young boys into the conversation of gender and household responsibilities. One in three women will experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime. CARE supports women’s empowerment by educating and leading boys to be advocates instead of pushing harmful social norms.

CARE has impacted 121 countries, with more than 1,400 projects and initiatives reaching 53 million people. The results of humanitarian crises affect millions more, including Manju. As she gave birth to her third child, Manju had to deliver dangerously on the side of the road. Bihar, India is one of the country’s poorest and largest states, and 90% rural. Due to long distances between health centers and poor winter road conditions, it took her almost four hours to get to the hospital.

From this emerged the Bihar Technical Support Program, a joint effort by CARE, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Government of Bihar. They were able to confront staggering rates of maternal, newborn and child mortality and malnutrition rates. As a result, Bihar has seen 20,000 fewer newborn deaths from 2011-2016, and the maternal mortality ratio has nearly halved between 2005 and 2018.

CARE has achieved a lot around the world since the 1940s, and it provides many ways to get involved, whether through donations, organizing locally or joining one of the CARE networks or committees.

– Rachael Wexler

Rachael is based in Chicago, IL, USA and focuses on Business and Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Addressing Poverty in Nigeria: The Obijackson Foundation

obijackson foundation Ernest Azudialu Obiejesi established the Obijackson Foundation in 2010 “to improve the socio-economic wellbeing of the poor in the community through access to education, health care and good nutrition.” These challenges prevent people from getting food, education and medical care, making it difficult to lead healthy and fulfilled lives. With high unemployment rates, poor infrastructure and limited services, many Nigerians are stuck in a cycle of poverty.

Key Areas

To help break this cycle of poverty in Nigeria, the Obijackson Foundation aims to bring the poor and marginalized back into the community by focusing on five main areas: education, health care, nutrition, enterprise and welfare. It strives to help Nigerian people build better futures for themselves not only by solving short-term problems but also by addressing the deeper causes of poverty, leading to more resilient communities over time.

The Foundation uses a holistic community-driven approach that looks at both the causes and the effects of poverty, understanding that real change must address both. Pamela Egbo, the Executive Director of the Foundation, stated, “We have a robust team of people who oversee our different areas of intervention and impact. In all our programs, we are very hands-on and involved on a personal level with our beneficiaries.” By filling important gaps in services and creating more opportunities, the Foundation helps build a more equitable society. The Foundation’s work has made a huge difference in many people’s lives by focusing on creating a long-lasting, positive path to end poverty in Nigeria for the next generation of Nigerians can live a better future.

Education

The Obijackson Foundation strongly believes that education is a basic human right and key to reducing poverty, and Egbo states that the Foundation is “very intentional in making sure that the citizens of Okija get the opportunity to access quality basic education.” Although global progress has been made in school enrollment, there remain barriers such as distance to schools, poor infrastructure, lack of materials and shortage of teachers.

The Foundation provides sponsorship for 40 children annually into the Gonzaga Jesuit Academy. Egbo stated: “This is one of our biggest accomplishments to date.” Egbo also adds that “many of these children cannot read or write fluently or speak English when they start, and it is amazing to see tremendous progress.” It also provided 200 scholarships so far and hopes to award 500 more by the end of 2025. It distributes textbooks and laptops and organizes seminars and workshops for teachers. The foundation also supports Yearly Computer-Based Testing (CBT) for training, quizzes and essay contests. with scholarships awarded to winners.

Health and Nutrition

The Foundation focuses on making affordable, quality health care available, especially for women and children. In partnership with the Obijackson Women and Children’s Hospital, it provides:

  • Maternal and pediatric care: The hospital’s maternal and neonatal intensive care units offer advanced care for preterm and growth-restricted newborns.
  • Health insurance: Over 100 people enrolled in free healthcare insurance.
  • Eye health: Over 200 free eye screenings and 18 eye surgeries (cataract and glaucoma).
  • Health and hygiene education: HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, and hepatitis B awareness, the “One Girl, One Pad” program to educate female students on menstrual health with sanitary pad donations to 1,300 girls.

The Obijackson Foundation’s nutrition programs include:

  • Pantry & Nutrition Program: Provides raw food items to widows, physically challenged and people with low-income, with distribution of dry food and provisions through 23 centers.
  • Soup Kitchens: Serves hot meals to over 6,000 people each month, including inmates in Anambra and Lagos during festive seasons.
  • Other Support Programs: Distributes food and personal items for beneficiaries such as the Oji River Special School for the blind, deaf and mute in Enugu, RECDOT, Jesus Abandoned Home, St. Joseph Home and Ebute Metta Leper’s Colony.

Job Creation

Despite challenges like rising feed costs, economic instability and unfavorable policies, the Foundation remains focuses on job creation and transforming agriculture and nutrition through programs such as Obijackson farm, which creates jobs for unemployed youth in Okija, with crop growing and livestock farming to meet the rising demand for animal products. It operates with 4,000 laying birds, producing about 30,000 crates of eggs annually and with 1,000 broilers quarterly. The piggery unit has grown to 385 pigs, with the ability to sell over 250 pigs yearly.

The Obijackson Foundation is more than just a charity, it is helping to create lasting change in society by tackling poverty in Nigeria. The Foundation’s work is crucial for future development in a country where poverty and inequality are still major problems. As it continues to grow and reach more communities, the Foundation stays true to its core mission and supports those in need and help build an equitable, healthier and more educated society for a better future.

– Rafe Photopoulos

Rafe is based in Gainesville, FL, USA and focuses on Good News for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

UNICEF’s HAC Appeal: Myanmar Stays Resilient

UNICEF's HACSince gaining independence in 1948, Myanmar has faced growing challenges involving its economy, internal conflict and public health. The International Rescue Committee (IRC) included Myanmar on its 2025 Emergency Watchlist, ranking it third among countries with the most significant risk of humanitarian disaster. International organizations such as UNICEF have supported the country for more than 70 years. Military juntas have governed Myanmar for most of its post-independence history. The first coup, led by General Ne Win in 1962, contributed to prolonged economic stagnation and persistent conflict between military leadership and opposition movements.

Escalating Conflict and Health Crisis Since 2021

Following the 2021 military coup by the Tatmadaw, escalating violence placed millions at risk. As of early 2025, more than 1.7 million people have been displaced. Limited access to vaccines and basic health care has contributed to Myanmar having the highest under-five mortality rate in Southeast Asia. Security conditions continue to deteriorate. Recent attacks include the arrest of opposition activists and airstrikes that have resulted in child casualties. Ground assaults have destroyed hospitals, further threatening access to health services.

Humanitarian Response by UNICEF and IRC

Organizations such as UNICEF and the IRC have worked to mitigate the crisis through long-term aid programs. UNICEF’s I.C.A.R.E. initiative combines cash assistance with rehabilitation services for children with disabilities. The agency also leads five inter-agency response priorities in Myanmar: WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene), education, nutrition, child protection and mine action.

In December 2024, UNICEF Regional Director for East Asia and the Pacific June Kunugi visited a daycare and physiotherapy center in Dala, Myanmar. Her visit included meetings with affected families and home visits to observe the program’s impact.

A beneficiary, six-year-old Wint Yamone Oo, receives support from the program, including cash transfers and mobility assistance. Wint attends therapy sessions and uses a walker provided through the initiative. The center continues to deliver services to children with disabilities and families facing displacement.

By the end of 2024, UNICEF’s HAC (Humanitarian Action for Children) appeal was launched, estimating that $208 million would be required to deliver critical services to 3.1 million vulnerable people across Myanmar.

Local Partnerships and Service Expansion

To ensure aid reaches marginalized populations, UNICEF partners with civil society organizations, nongovernmental organizations and other United Nations (U.N.) agencies. These partnerships help extend access to health and social protections and incorporate community feedback into service delivery.

UNICEF emphasizes the importance of collaboration with local-based actors to enhance program reach and responsiveness. This approach helps tailor support based on regional needs and reinforces long-term community engagement.

While UNICEF’s 2023 HAC appeal remained underfunded, ongoing efforts aim to secure greater donor support for 2024. UNICEF continues to advocate for sustainable funding to ensure continued assistance for children and families affected by conflict in Myanmar.

Looking Ahead

Ongoing support from international organizations remains vital as Myanmar continues to navigate its humanitarian crisis. Strengthening partnerships with local actors and expanding access to essential services could help protect vulnerable populations and lay the groundwork for long-term recovery.

– Rachael Wexler

Rachael is based in Chicago, IL, USA and focuses on Global Health for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

Stepping Up as Global Funding Declines: NGOs Replacing U.S. Aid

NGOs Replacing U.S. AidSince January 2025, significant shifts in U.S. foreign aid policy have left a substantial void in global development funding. The Trump administration’s decision to freeze the USAID funding has disrupted health and humanitarian programs worldwide and damaged its credibility in previous commitments to public health and humanitarian efforts. This abrupt halt has suspended vital initiatives, forcing many organizations to shut down projects, lay off staff and withdraw from communities—further intensifying the challenges that NGOs replacing U.S. aid in affected regions face

The Immediate Impact of Aid Cuts

The immediate impact of USAID cuts has been severe and far-reaching, affecting millions of people worldwide. The U.S. has historically been a driving force in international development assistance, but the recent cuts have led to the collapse of USAID-backed programs, creating a funding void that private donors struggle to fill.

Global health programs like the International Rescue Committee (IRC), which works to prevent and treat infectious diseases, and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) are among the hardest hit. With fewer resources, NGOs replacing U.S. aid face an uphill battle in controlling outbreaks, leaving the most vulnerable populations at higher risk.

To put the impact into numbers, “about 80% of the 1,460 community kitchens across Sudan shut down when USAID paused all funding,” according to Hajooj Kuka, spokesperson for the Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs) in Khartoum state, as reported by Al Jazeera, an independent news channel in the Arab world.

In contrast, advocacy groups continue to push forward for restored funding, emphasizing that foreign aid is not just a moral duty but a strategic investment in global stability.

NGOs’ Strategic Responses and Challenges

As NGOs replacing U.S. aid navigate these challenges, they have intensified efforts to influence policy changes and secure alternative resources. One of their key strategies is diversification, with public-private partnerships emerging as a major source of funding. This advocacy is essential to keeping global development priorities on the international agenda.

To cope with funding shortfalls, many NGOs are implementing temporary measures such as tapping into their financial reserves and unrestricted funds to sustain essential operations. They are also renegotiating agreements with other donors and seeking waivers to maintain critical services. Additionally, some staff members are working voluntarily to keep essential programs running. While these efforts demonstrate the dedication of those in the sector, they also underscore the urgent need for sustainable funding solutions.

The Future of NGOs in a Changing Aid Scene

With persistent global challenges such as changing weather patterns, rising inequality and ongoing conflicts, the need for resilience and adaptability among NGOs replacing U.S. aid is more critical than ever. These organizations are actively seeking diverse funding alternatives, forging strategic partnerships and embracing technology to sustain their operations. The ability of NGOs to replace U.S. aid to navigate these changes could be crucial in shaping the future of international aid and development.

– Rhasna Albuquerque

Rhasna is based in Fortaleza, Brazil and focuses on Good News and Celebs for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

,

How Emergency Response Rooms are Alleviating Poverty in Sudan

Alleviating Poverty in SudanSudan is the third-largest country in Africa and one of the poorest in the world, with 57% of the population in extreme poverty. Since April 2023, a civil war in the country has killed more than 18,800 civilians and forced 14 million people to leave their homes. The United Nations (U.N.) has estimated that 30.4 million people need humanitarian assistance. The WFO and WHO operate in the area, but the conflict’s shifting conditions make the delivery of international aid difficult. However, another form of aid is alleviating poverty in Sudan: Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs).

Community-Led Aid in Sudan

The first ERRs in Sudan began in 2019 and now comprise more than 700 volunteer-run spaces that provide food, medicine and support for communities, alleviating poverty in Sudan. While international agencies face limitations, the ERRs deliver community-led support that improves how donations are used and localizes the delivery of aid. This approach—known as mutual aid—has reached more than 11.5 million people. The ERRs’ impact has earned them a nomination for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. Through community networks, efficient delivery and adaptable structures, ERRs offer a localized model of aid in Sudan.

Community Links and Flexibility

In addition to adapting quickly to the civil war’s impact on aid delivery, the ERRs operate within local communities and use pre-existing resources. The outbreak of war worsened Sudan’s food crisis, putting 25 million people at risk of starvation. While U.N. food trucks are restricted to refugee camps in neighboring Chad, ERRs can deliver food supplies. ERRs in the state of West Kordofan feed 177,000 people daily.

As Kholood Khair, director of the think tank Confluence Advisory, puts it, “[ERRs] are able to negotiate access locally; they are able to buy from local markets; they are able to make their activities as flexible as needs be, very unlike NGOs.” That flexibility has allowed ERRs to serve various roles over the years. A forerunner to the ERRs started in 2013 in response to mass flooding and ERRs played a key role during the COVID-19 pandemic by raising awareness, disinfecting hospitals and distributing medicine. The ERRs’ local roots and adaptability continue to help address crises as they arise.

Mutual Aid and Cost Efficiency

International aid often involves donor dependency and external control. ERRs, by contrast, give local communities the tools to manage their own needs. Rather than relying on international structures, mutual aid efforts in Sudan have created local alternatives. According to the Mutual Aid Sudan Coalition—a group of philanthropic and aid organizations that support ERRs—$0.95 of every $1 donated goes directly to local actors. In comparison, UNICEF reports that £0.75 of every £1 goes toward its work for children and the British Red Cross states that £0.65 of every £1 helps people in crisis. This higher percentage of funds reaching local communities reveals how ERRs provide a more direct use of donations.

The Future of ERRs and International Aid in Sudan

In September 2024, the Mutual Aid Sudan Coalition pledged to allocate $2 million to ERRs by the end of the year, calling mutual aid “the most viable and cost-effective mechanism to reach at-risk communities.” While this support remains essential, some challenges persist. A recent report from the Social Science in Humanitarian Action Platform stated that the success of ERRs might “enable a new era of localization in Sudan,” but noted that international aid frameworks do not align with the ERRs’ model.

Bringing ERRs closer to international aid networks could increase funding opportunities. However, doing so could reduce the flexibility and responsiveness that have made them effective. Maintaining the ERRs’ local approach can potentially preserve their ability to respond directly and efficiently to community needs.

– Oliver Tanner

Oliver is based in London, UK and focuses on Technology and Solutions, Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

EU Grants €1.9 billion to Revitalize Moldova’s Economy

Revitalize Moldova's EconomyThe Republic of Moldova is a country in Eastern Europe, bordering Romania and Ukraine. The country found difficulties in maintaining a stable economy in the following decades, and despite a recent upturn in economic growth, Moldova still faces widespread poverty.

The Reform and Growth Facility

The Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova is an economic initiative first proposed by the European Commission in 2024. This year, the European Union and the government of Moldova reached political agreements on the restrictions to the Reform Agenda, officially establishing it as the financial basis for the Country’s current Growth Plan. The European Commission is funding the plan with  €1.9 billion in financial aid from 2025 to 2027. The money will be allocated twice a year on the request of The Republic of Moldova’s parliament after the European Council confirms that all conditions of the initiative have been fulfilled.

The Economy of Moldova

Moldova is one of the poorest nations in Europe, according to the BBC. Although the Republic’s GDP has steadily increased over the past two decades, poverty and unemployment remain commonplace, especially in rural areas. For example, 13.3% of Moldovans fall below the poverty line, and nearly 25% of people between the ages of 15 and 34 do not work or attend school or apprenticeships.

Furthermore, the country’s economic structure has a multitude of underlying obstacles. For instance, it is agriculturally reliant, the BBC reports and does not produce much in the way of energy, importing a majority of its gas, oil and coal. Other structural limitations include government deficiencies, a lack of competition in the marketplace, and unequal business opportunities, all of which, according to the European Council President Ursula von der Leyen, the Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova will attempt to reform and revitalize Moldova’s economy.

The Intended Outcome

The Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova intends to provide financial support, elevate the country’s economy and bring Moldova a step closer to membership in the Europen Union. The first objective, expanding monetary assistance, will include implementing broadband internet to rural regions, as well as providing financial backing to 25,000 Moldovan businesses, according to EU4Digital.

The program also plans to contribute significant socioeconomic and structural reforms with a focus on infrastructure, the government’s role in the economy and social capital. Ursula von der Leyen put it best when she stated, “We invest in jobs, growth, services and infrastructure – from new hospitals in Balti and Cahul to the road from the capital to Odesa,” EU4Digital reports.

The Growth Facility will prioritize building sustainable energy production within Moldova by constructing a new electricity powerline that connects to the EU electricity grid, and as a result, by 2026, the country could no longer rely on energy imports. Foundationally, the Reform Plan will advocate for democracy and anti-corruption within the Moldovian government and will provide support on restructuring the economy to an open market system hinged on fair competition.

The Reform will also integrate Moldova into the European Union’s Single Market. This alone could lead to the Republic’s assimilation into global supply-chains, allowing for increased mobility of products, trade opportunities and involvement in the Digital Marketplace.

A Lesson for Foreign Aid

Since Moldova’s independence, the Reform has been the largest European Union support package, according to the European Commission. Moreover, access to the European Union’s single market has been the prominent economic growth factor for all previously included countries. It is certainly apparent though, what foreign aid can do to revitalize Moldova’s economy and reduce poverty in the country.

– Amelia Dutch Player

Amelia is based in Savannah, GA, USA and focuses on Good News and Politics for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr

, ,

The Sustainable Agriculture Foundation: Improving Farmer’s Lives

Sustainable Agriculture FoundationThe Sustainable Agriculture Foundation provides agricultural support to smallholder farmers in developing nations to mitigate food insecurity, boost rural economies and make sustainable markets accessible. The foundation has worked with more than 1 million farmers to improve yield and advance economic prospects, with more than 700 farmer hubs in Bangladesh alone that have helped to improve approximately 595,000 smallholders’ yields and income levels.

Farming in Bangladesh

The majority of agriculture workers in Bangladesh are smallholder farmers. Limited opportunities to obtain training and use contemporary technology curbs farmers from working at a sustainable and attainable level. Bangladeshi farmers face the ramifications of extreme weather patterns which hamper the quality and quantity of crops. Deficient yields reduce the income made by smallholder farmers, significantly impacting their livelihoods and worsening their quality of life, according to the Sustainable Agriculture Foundation.

Agriculture and Poverty Reduction

Research indicates that approximately 70% of the Bangladeshi population live in rural areas, the majority of which have or are from a low-income background. Poverty in rural areas is often extreme and ensues at a higher rate than in urban areas. In rural Bangladesh, primary agriculture is the main employer of residents, with this type of agriculture remaining the least-productive.  A key driver of agricultural growth is technology that promotes high crop yields.

Agricultural technology has positive implications for the community. Due to the high proportion of people who live in extreme poverty and work in agricultural sectors, the development that new technology offers significantly helps to aid poverty reduction. Improvements in agricultural technology focus on productivity growth rather than resource growth. Instead of working to boost the availability of resources, such as accessing more water to grow more crops, new technology utilizes resources already in existence to improve and increase the productivity and quality of yields.

Growth Reducing Poverty

Growth in the agricultural sector is approximately two to three times more beneficial to poverty reduction than growth in other sectors. This is proportional to the rate at which poverty coincides with those in agricultural work; for example, those in developing countries may have a low level of literacy and therefore rely on agriculture for their livelihood.

Crucially, the advantages that agricultural development and technology present can be used in both coastal and inland regions. The stretch of these technologies is not geographically limited, making poverty reduction via agriculture technology an initiative that can be implemented across developing countries.

Enhancing Food Security

One way in which agricultural technology contributes to the alleviation of extreme poverty is by enhancing food security. Genetic modification bolsters food supply, which makes the availability of crops with desirable characteristics more prevalent. In turn, this increases the food supply and crops have high quality. Similarly, biofortification – the process of filling produce with nutrients – aids in the reduction of malnutrition and deficiency. Post-harvest losses are also tackled through agro-processing technologies that improve the quality, availability and accessibility of produce.

Agricultural technology also enables the use of territory surveillance, such as drones, to monitor and map the health of crops, allowing for early prevention if various issues in early stages. The technology also helps with weather forecasts, using sensors that make decisions on irrigation and crop control. The use of sustainable resources also augments soil health, pest control and water management by increasing effectiveness and decreasing dependency on chemicals and pesticides.

The Sustainable Agriculture Foundation in Bangladesh

The Sustainable Agriculture Foundation aims to improve the lives of smallholder farmers in Bangladesh by boosting economic growth and the livelihoods of locals via an emphasis on risk mitigation related to extreme weather patterns.

In Surokkha, Bangladesh, the Sustainable Agriculture Foundation carried out an initiative that promoted risk mitigation measures for natural disaster adaptability. From September 2018 to September 2022, the Sustainable Agriculture Foundation targeted 233,000 farmers to improve the resilience of agriculture and create stable livelihoods for smallholder farmers. Alongside providing farmers insurance, the program also emphasized the projection of the crop insurance market.

The key measures included the building of insurers and stakeholders, improving farmers’ literacy and awareness, market development studies, weather index crop insurance product expansion and risk management studies.

The outcome of the initiative meant that 421,767 farmers held insurance for potato, rice and maize – a quarter of which were women. Additionally, the initiative developed 21 weather index insurance products and on average, 6.60 decimals per farmer land gained insurance. Significantly, a further 149,343 farmers received payouts of BDT 84,016,858.

The work of the Sustainable Agriculture Foundation has provided stability and insurance to thousands of smallholder farmers in Bangladesh, strengthening the community’s ability to handle extreme weather patterns and mitigate associated risks. In turn, the lives of those experiencing extreme poverty improved through the stability of the resources that agricultural technology offers.

– Ella Dorman

Ella is based in Worcestershire, UK and focuses on Technology and Solutions for The Borgen Project.

Photo: Flickr